Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byVictoria Turner Modified over 9 years ago
1
Community Land Trusts Implementation in North St. Louis in collaboration with Old North St. Louis Restoration Group
2
Challenges of inner city neighborhoods for CDCs ❖ Role of representing the community in terms of development ❖ Which members to represent ❖ Economic growth often shuts out certain people (gentrification)
3
Previous attempts to balance needs of present neighborhood with the goals of St. Louis City (economic development, increased tax base)
4
Which neighborhoods ❖ Lasalle Park - sponsored by philanthropic corporation ❖ Murphy/Cass - Tenant Management Associations ❖ Wash U and SLU development around medical schools - large institutional sponsor ❖ Forest Park Southeast/Tower Grove- development companies associate w/non- profits
5
Perspectives on development ❖ New “model town” view ❖ Control by outsiders ❖ Diversity discouraged ❖ Housing must be beautiful and expensive to ensure “luxury” prices ❖ Upper middle class working people only ❖ Ex. Pullman Company Towns ❖ “Urban Village” view ❖ Control by insiders ❖ Diversity embraced ❖ Housing may or may not be beautiful but it is affordable ❖ Interest in community programs and services ❖ Mixed income residents ❖ Ex. Dudley Neighborhood in Boston
6
“Give a persona fish and he eats for a day. Teach a person to fish and he eats for a lifetime. That's a lie! The real issue is: Who owns the pond?”... “Give a person a fish” equals charity. “Teach a person to fish,” emphasizes job skills. But if the one fishing does not own the pond, she can be denied the right to fish in the pond.
7
Encouraging “Urban Village” development ❖ Important to ensure affordable housing in neighborhood and ensure diverse community involvement: ❖ Tax credits (subsidized housing)/Mixed Income Housing ❖ Hope VI ❖ Public Housing ❖ Co-ops ❖ Community Land Trusts
8
Why community land trusts? ❖ Increase supply of permanently affordable housing ❖ Increase real estate equity savings among residents ❖ Encourage developers to participate in affordable housing
9
Why community land trusts? ❖ Returns abandoned real estate and vacant land to tax rolls ❖ Enhances and collaborates community development programs ❖ Facilitates partnerships between residents, businesses, non-profits and area developers
10
Why community land trusts? ❖ A win-win situation for all stakeholders ❖ Creates incentive for people to stay in community, not flip or leave them behind ❖ Sense of belonging ❖ Political force
11
Communities like ours which have done it
12
Camden, NJ ❖ Started through affordable housing activists during a power fight with the City ❖ Used co-op method in order to retain long-term control of land by co-op ❖ Bought property where knew speculators would try to buy ❖ Ensured less looting of construction sites by hiring local workforce
13
Boston, MA - Dudley ❖ Gained large amount of properties through eminent domain along with City granting properties to CLT ❖ Used Community Land Trust as their mechanism ❖ 150 homes in CLT
14
Holyoke, MA ❖ CDC formed b/c city plan to industrialize residential area to protect residents against absentee landlords ❖ Represents a “resettlement” model of a CLT, rather than a “displacement” model
15
Community Steps toward a CLT
16
❖ Community survey on land control ❖ Community meetings explaining CLT concept ❖ Form working groups ❖ Elect members to committees ❖ Committee elects board
17
Community Steps toward a CLT ❖ Alternative would be to just create an advisory board within ONSL ❖ ONSL board, seeing that there is obvious community interest, will meet to determine whether ONSL will split organization or carry a 2nd 501(c)(3) ❖ Land trust agreement discussed by board meetings and signed
18
Community Steps toward a CLT ❖ Board meeting discussion of articles of non profit incorporation and eventual filing with state ❖ Raise money and acquire property ❖ Work for “perpetually affordable housing programs on a state level”
19
Legal steps toward a CLT
20
❖ ONSL board, seeing that there is obvious community interest, will meet to determine whether ONSL will split organization or carry a 2nd 501(c)(3) ❖ 501 (c)(3) set up using community input ❖ Land trust agreement discussed by board meetings and signed ❖ Determine how property will be provided to residents ❖ Determine particulars of ground lease including how resale price agreements would work
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.