Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

COMPONENT TEST H4IRRAD 15 TH NOVEMBER 2011 G. Spiezia, P. Peronnard, G. Foucard, S. Danzeca, P. Gander, E. Fadakis (EN/STI/ECE)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "COMPONENT TEST H4IRRAD 15 TH NOVEMBER 2011 G. Spiezia, P. Peronnard, G. Foucard, S. Danzeca, P. Gander, E. Fadakis (EN/STI/ECE)"— Presentation transcript:

1 COMPONENT TEST H4IRRAD 15 TH NOVEMBER 2011 G. Spiezia, P. Peronnard, G. Foucard, S. Danzeca, P. Gander, E. Fadakis (EN/STI/ECE)

2 Outline  Component description  Goal of the test  Setup  Radiation conditions and dosimetry  Results  Conclusions

3 Components under test DUT Type- Tec Voltag e Parameters Nb parts Temperature ºC AD822Jfet-Amp+/-5 V Current bias/Offset Latch-up 2Room AD8220DiffAmp+/-5 V Offset Latch-up 2Room LTC2052 OpAmp- CMOS +/-5 V Offset Latch-up 2Room XC95108CPLD+5 VLatch-up370 XC95108CPLD+5 VLatch-up3Room MAX11046ADC +5 V Latch-up375 PCM1702kDAC+/-5 VLatch-up375

4 Motivation  Compare test at H4IRRAD and PSI for a better understanding of the ELDRS effect and destructive events  Some devices taken from the TRAD report  AD822  Known to be sensitive to ELDRS  To be tested at PSI at higher dose rate  AD8220  Tested at PSI and failed at 40 Gy  Comparison with H4IRRAD  LTC2052  LET threshold for latch-up at <10 MeV.cm2/mg.,  th =10 -6 cm 2  sat =10 -4  Test at H4IRRAD and PSI to verify if latch-up are induced

5 Motivation  CPLD XC95108  Tested at PSI HI and showed latch-up  Comparison with H4IRRAD. Test at room temperature and heated  Implementation of a shift registers  MAX11046-16 bit ADC  Tested at PSI. No Latch-up  Comparison with H4IRRAD. Test at room temperature and heated  PCM1702K- 20 bit DAC  Possible use of the component  Test at H4IRRAD to verify destructive events. Test at room temperature and heated  Test at PSI to verify the TID and the cross section for Soft and destructive SEE

6 SETUP  Monitoring of the parameter drift  Amplifier parameters, ADC reference, and current consumption measured with a multimeter. Slow acquisition  Latch-up test  Separate anti latch-up circuit for each positive and negative Voltage supply  Unique anti latch-up circuit for the 3 ADC MAX11046 and the amplifiers  16 channels acquired at 1 MS/s for the latch-up detection

7 H4IRRAD – Beam conditions  H4IRRAD Internal location  Mixed field and high energy hadrons ±5 cm ±10 cm @ M. Calviani

8 H4IRRAD – Beam conditions  H4IRRAD Internal location target Top of internal rack with component test

9 H4IRRAD – Beam conditions  H4IRRAD Internal location  1.2e9 pot per cycle  Cycle ~ 45 s  Bunch length 5 s  TID/Pot ~ 3e-12 [Gy/pot]  TID per cycle ~ 3.6 mGy  TID during extraction (5s)=2.6Gy/h  Average Dose rate (3.6 mGy over 45 sec) = 0.3 Gy/h  Recommended dose rate to evaluate ELDR

10 H4IRRAD – Dosimetry  FLUKA calculation (TID in air)  High gradient on the target line  TID 35 Gy, HEH 4-5x10 10 cm -2

11 H4IRRAD – Dosimetry for TID  FLUKA calculation (TID in air)  High gradient on the target line  Score position to be reviewed  Radfets on the RADMON (2 oxide Thickness) FLUKA [Gy Air ]±50%400nm [Gy -Si]100nm [Gy -Si]TID ±50% 19/06-27/06703046 19/06-25/0716070100100±50 19/06-21/07130608585±40 SLOT 3 19/10-7/11 3225(TO be Verified)3535±17

12 H4IRRAD – Dosimetry for TID  FLUKA calculation (TID in air)  High gradient on the target line  Score position to be reviewed  Radfets on the RADMON (2 oxide Thickness)  HEH fluence is ~5x10 10 cm -2 POT= 1.12e+013 Radmon 1Radmon 2Radmon 3Radmon 4Radmon 5 Fluka Fluence HEH [cm -2 ] 5,62E+091,20E+102,62E+106,12E+108,35E+09 Fluence with SEU/TID ±11% 3,50E+091,07E+102,59E+104,78E+105,66E+09 Fluence with SEU/POT ±16% 0,00E+00 3,20E+105,07E+100,00E+00 % Difference Fluka vs SEU/TID 381112232 % Difference Fluka vs SEU/POT ---2217-

13 Results DUT Type Technology PSI, p+, >250Gy/h * H4IRRAD 0.3 Gy/h * H4IRRAD HEH [cm - 2 ]** Temperature AD822Jfet-AmpNo tested35-ok0 latchRoom AD8220DiffAmp 40 Gy - broken 35-ok0 latchRoom LTC2052OpAmp-CMOS Not tested yet 35-ok0 latchRoom XC95108CPLD35 – ok0 latchRoom XC95108CPLD35 - ok2 latch70 C MAX11046ADC- BiCMOS 200 Gy- Broken 35 – ok0 latch80 C PCM1702kDAC0 latch70 C *Max TID without failure or TID at which measurements are out of spec **Fluence/ nb latch

14 Results  Notes  Signals are noisy due to long cables  Decimation is applied for analysis Amplitude [V] OctoberNovember Noise Expected level

15 Results – AD822  H4IRRAD  3 Gy/h(per extraction)  0.3Gy/h (average)  35 Gy  Within specification but TID is low  PSI test to be done  NSREC2009: I bias degradation at about 50-70 Gy at 0.01 rad/s  0.3 Gy/h ~35 Gy (100nm radfet measurement) I bias current

16 Results – AD8220  PSI  250 Gy/h  230 MeV p+  30 Gy –failure  I bias very high as soon as the beam is on-1nA  H4IRRAD  3 Gy/h(per extraction)  0.3Gy/h (average)  Within specification Differential amplifier; output signal OctoberNovember

17 Results – CPLD  H4IRRAD  5x10 10 cm 2  2 Latch-up events on the heated CPLD

18 Results – CPLD  H4IRRAD  5x10 10 cm 2  2 Latch-up events on the heated CPLD Power ON Power OFF Current increase to 500 mA First event

19 Results – CPLD  H4IRRAD  5x10 10 cm 2  2 Latch-up events on the heated CPLD Power ON Power OFF Current increase to 500 mA

20 Results – CPLD  H4IRRAD  5x10 10 cm 2  2 Latch-up events on the heated CPLD Latch

21 Conclusions  AD822  almost at the limit of specifications;  Seem to agree with literature  PSI test to be done  CPLD  Other components within specifications  2 Latch-up on the CPLD  No Latch-up on MAX11046 and PCM  Note  Signals are noisy  Detailed tests on mixed signal devices require a protected zone where a mother board can be placed  Comparison H4IRRAD (low dose rate and mixed field) – PSI (p+ 230 MeV, high flux, high dose rate)  Total TID 35 Gy; HEH fluence 5x10 10 cm -2  Less Fluence than expected  Difficult to compare

22 Back-up  http://file.lw23.com/file1/01589226.pdf

23 How to explain  H4IRRAD spectrum  Spectrum in the target line is dominated by high energy hadrons (Needed to verify destructive events)  Dose enhancement effect seems to appear mainly in case of Co60 irradiation  Microelectronics may degrade less in a Hadron environment with respect to pure gamma irradiation  Open point: depending on the technology, the Hadron energy (literature focused on proton), and the percentage composition of our spectrum

24 Results-slot 1 &2 DUT Type- Technology PSI, p+, >250Gy/h * H4IRRAD 0.3 Gy/h * Comment MAX410OpAmp-Bip100 Gy-ok85-ok OPA2227OpAmp200 Gy -ok85-ok TL072OpAmp200 Gy-ok- TL431Voltage Ref200 Gy-ok85 – ok TL432Voltage Ref 200 Gy-ok 85 - ok LM4041Voltage Ref200 Gy-Ok85 – ok INA141DiffAmp 130Gy-Out of spec 85 - ok Limit of spec MAX6341 Voltage Ref (ADC) 25 Gy-Out of spec 25 Gy-Out of spec. 3 mV drift over 100 Gy * Max TID without failure or TID at which measurements are out of spec


Download ppt "COMPONENT TEST H4IRRAD 15 TH NOVEMBER 2011 G. Spiezia, P. Peronnard, G. Foucard, S. Danzeca, P. Gander, E. Fadakis (EN/STI/ECE)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google