Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Planning & Public Health “My Oh My” Spokane County Active Living Task Force Melissa Wittstruck-Eadie, AICP Planner City of Spokane, WA Heleen Dewey Health.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Planning & Public Health “My Oh My” Spokane County Active Living Task Force Melissa Wittstruck-Eadie, AICP Planner City of Spokane, WA Heleen Dewey Health."— Presentation transcript:

1 Planning & Public Health “My Oh My” Spokane County Active Living Task Force Melissa Wittstruck-Eadie, AICP Planner City of Spokane, WA Heleen Dewey Health Educator Spokane Regional Health District

2 Near Nature, Near Perfect. But Where is Spokane?

3 About Spokane 2008 Spokane County population 459,000 (estimate) City of Spokane largest jurisdiction at 204,400 Our health and activity level? – 60% of County residents overweight or obese – Fewer than half of all adults and children get recommended levels of physical activity

4 60% of the respondents stated more money should be spent to improve walking and biking infrastructure such as sidewalks, bike lanes, and trails in our community. 2006 Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Project Study Average commute is ½ mile for walkers and 1 ½ miles for bikers 1% of trips by bike (2% nationally) 9% of trips by walking (same as nation) 42% of children are driven [1] Nonmortorized Transportation Pilot Program Evaluation Study. University of Minnesota. 2007. Communities surveyed: Marin County, CA; Minneapolis, MN, Sheboygan, WI, Columbia, MO, and Spokane, WA

5 How we got started 2004 -$3500 annual grant for 5-years from DOT/DOH in cooperation with CDC Co-facilitated by Spokane Regional Health District and City of Spokane Task Force made up of professionals, advocates, and agency representatives.

6 Active Living Task Force Partners Spokane Regional Health District (SRHD) City of Spokane Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) Spokane County Advocates Universities Washington State Department of Transportation Department of Health Community Trade and Economic Development Medical Community YMCA

7 2007 Active Community Environments Assessment Strengths: Excellent commute trip reduction program (CTR) Active Living group established Successful with Safe Routes to School programs Continuing Challenges: Decline in funding for bike/ped improvements Perception of facilities for bike/ped transportation Lack of strong policy for non- motorized transportation

8 Spokane Assessment Recommendations Develop a bike and pedestrian plan Best practice- educate Review design standards

9 Active Living Symposium Education connection public health and planning specific to our community Outcomes: City of Spokane Plan Commission reviews Comprehensive Plan for healthy community policies Complemented City of Spokane’s 2007 Quality of Life resolution

10 Connecting the City Current policies not implemented and needed updating Lacked connection between non- motorized transportation agencies Generated ideas and support to develop a stronger non-motorized plan Identified priority projects and effective policy/regulatory intervention More communication/collaboration among different user groups

11 Outcomes of Workshop Programmatic/Policy Enforce development standards Bike/Ped coordinator Impact fees Bike boulevards Physical Stripe SE Blvd, others Route across river Sidewalks Fish Lake Trail connections Fill gaps in existing routes

12 Regional Pedestrian Plan Three year Preventative Health Block Grant from DOH Incorporate active living policies into community pedestrian planning documents – Year 1; Countywide guidance document adopted by Spokane Regional Transportation Council – Year 2-3; City of Spokane planning – Year 3; Smaller jurisdictions in the county

13 SmartRoutes Rails to Trails Campaign Goal: – Double funding for active transportation Timeframe: – During reauthorization of federal transportation budget projected for 2010 Potential: – 40 communities to receive $50 Million for projects Engineering, education, encouragement, and planning projects selected to increasing resident’s walking and bicycling for transportation

14 Ever Evolving Education – for partners & communities! Joint Presentation to the Board of Health: Why are active communities important for jurisdictions? Negative economic impacts= Direct costs and lost revenue for the jurisdiction Positive economic impacts= Business recruitment, in-migration, and tourism

15 Remember that $3,500? Source Grant from DOH In-Kind from SRHD and City of Spokane Striping a bike lane Citywide Bike Master Plan Update Building Community Capacity for Active Living Cost $17,500 over 5 yrs $30,000 over 5 yrs $50,000 allocated $50,000 and counting PRICELESS

16 Outcomes Quiet Catalyst - Partnerships – YMCA Pioneering Healthier Communities – SmartRoutes 2010 – Lands Council Complete Streets Resolution – Board of Health Active Technical Transportation Committee (regional – SRTC) Health Impact Assessment Training Active Living Leadership Elected Officials

17 Insights Understanding each other’s goals, needs, and strengths Clearinghouse Catalyst – ALTF could seed the project, didn’t have to own it. Capacity – Education, Outreach, New Ideas Unintentional Succession plan Timing – Health, Smart Growth, Gas Prices, Sustainability, Economics/Market Demands, Political Climate, Grassroots Another face for funding requests Rediscover the connections between Planning and Public Health


Download ppt "Planning & Public Health “My Oh My” Spokane County Active Living Task Force Melissa Wittstruck-Eadie, AICP Planner City of Spokane, WA Heleen Dewey Health."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google