1. WJTSC 10-1 USG Interagency Working Group 31 March 2010

2. Agenda 0800 – 0815 Welcome and Introductions Mr. Gary Quay, JS J-7
0815 – 0900 Training for Integrated Ops Mr. Frank DiGiovanni,
OSD (R&T)
Information Sharing Mr. Bill Barlow, OSD (NII)
LTC Bob Klein, OSD (P)
0930 – 0950 ACC’s ANGEL THUNDER Lt Col Patrick Pope, ACC/A3J
0950 – National Intelligence Support Team Maj Roland Sarino, NIST
1000 – 1015 BREAK
1015 – 1040 R&S FY 10/11 TEE Mr. Eric Halzel, DoS S/CRS

3. Agenda
1040 – 1045 Interagency Logistics Symposium CDR Novak-Tibbet, TRANSCOM
1045 – 1130 UN Office for the Coordination of Mr. Fred Polk, UN OCHA
Humanitarian Affairs Mr. Michael Marks, UN OCHA
1130 – 1200 Center for Complex Operations Mr. Dale Erickson, CCO
1200 – 1300 LUNCH
1300 – 1320 JTIMS Discussion Mr. Gary Quay
1320 – Status of FY 11/12 Support Requests Mr. Rob Webster
1340 – Future Focus of Working Group Mr. Gary Quay
1410 – Standing Issue Mr. Gary Quay

4. Agenda 1430 – 1445 BREAK 1445 – 1600 New Issues Mr. Gary Quay
1600 – 1615 Training for Integrated Operations Mr. Gary Quay
1615 – 1630 Working Group Wrap up / Closing Remarks Mr. Gary Quay
1630 – COCOM /Services Breakout Mr. Gary Quay

5. Goals Share information and build relationships
Identify our integrated operations training roles
Define purpose and goals of this WG
Determine disposition of standing issue
Identify and Discuss Potential New Issues
Discuss Way-ahead

6. Conference Theme: Training for Integrated Operations
Problem: Emerging and existing strategic guidance continues to emphasize a comprehensive approach involving all elements of U.S. national power, and involvement of other stakeholders, in a complex operational environment is becoming the norm in solving national security challenges. The level of synchronization and coordination to fully operationalize integrated activities requires focused preparation in joint training programs.
Background: DOD defines integrated operations as the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of DOD and other U.S. Government agencies’ activities, in coordination with partner nations, and non-governmental entities across the full range of military operations, which achieves a comprehensive approach that advances U.S. Government goals and objectives. DODD directs the combatant commands to establish and conduct integrated operations training as required by joint mission essential tasks.
Synonymous expressions such as “comprehensive approach” or “unified action” are variants of this DOD-defined term. Unified Action is “the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of the activities of governmental and nongovernmental entities with military operations to achieve unity of effort.”
Chairman’s Joint Training Guidance, identifies “Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Nongovernmental Organization Coordination” as a Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff High Interest Training Issue for incorporation as appropriate into combatant command joint training programs.

7. Integration of Interagency Partners
Issue : Inadequate partner representation/environmental emulation in Combatant Command and Service training, education, exercises, and experimentation degrades the quality of these events.
Discussion: DOD recognizes the value of non-DOD partner participation in its exercises. Partner participation provides authoritative and realistic input and support to training events; however, satisfying participation requests is hampered by both interagency capacity to support and perceptions of shared objectives and value.
End State: DOD events reflect current policy and the complexity of integrated planning and operations.
POA&M: To enhance partner integration: 1. Identify and analyze participation gaps Develop potential mitigation strategies.
OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/HD, JS J-7 JETD; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB
1st Quarter FY 10
FY 09
SEP 09
Feb 10
MAR 10
FY10
FY 11
Implement process for FY 10/11
Year end assessment
Initiate Process for FY 11/12
Publish Draft
FY 10/11 Plan
Update at WJTSC 10-1
Complete POA&M
Interagency Process Effectively Supports DoD Exercises 7

8. Training for Integrated Operations
Issue 10-xxx: Current integrated Civ-Mil training and exercise strategy, planning, resourcing and implementation is not adequate to support current and future integrated operations requirements.
Discussion:
DOD recognizes that we must train to effectively conduct Civ-Mil operations with non-DOD partners
Lack of a comprehensive DOD interagency engagement strategy, lack of a common civ-mil operating picture, and inadequate funding exacerbates the challenges of conducting integrated operations training.
End State: Partner integration in DoD training events facilitates a holistic collaborative approach to achieve National Security objectives and properly balance diplomacy, development, and defense.
POA&M: 1. Develop a comprehensive DOD strategy for engagement with interagency partners, including a funding strategy. 2. Develop a CJCSI that implements the DOD strategy and codifies processes for requesting interagency support. 3. Develop mission essential tasks that reflect partnership roles in integrated operations. 4. Assess readiness impact of interagency integration or lack thereof. 5. Establish an Interagency Training Community of Interest Portal.
OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/P, JS J-7; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB
AD HOC Efforts
JFCOM
IW IA
Requirements Div
Solutions Div
COCOMs
S/CRS
USDA
NTC
10th Mtn Div
CTCs
USMC
OIF
OEF
Camp Atterbury
Muscatatuck
FY10
FY10
FY10
FY10
FY10/11
FY 12
Assess Readiness Impact
Complete Strategy
Complete CJCSI
Develop METS
Develop TCOI Portal
DOD Training Effectively Supports Integrated Operations 8

9. National Rehearsal Program
Issue 10-xxx: The current NEP does not adequately facilitate the exercise of real world international threat streams and adversaries. Consequently, combatant commands cannot realistically exercise their contingency plans with interagency partners if they link to the NEP.
Discussion:
Recent CMX and PR/AWGSE 10 SLS discussions indentified the requirement for a National Level Rehearsal
Domestic incident management does not incorporate international threat streams and disrupt/respond options
Requirement for an exercise construct with senior whole of government integration for maximum collaboration and participation
Requirement for a senior level rehearsal program with flexibility to keep ahead of current threats
Requires exercise integration of real world threat streams on an annual basis (Example: CT, Cyber, WMD)
Requirement to partner with interagency during development and execution of National Level Rehearsal
COA 1: Enhance/modify current NEP construct developing exercise framework addressing actual OCONUS threats on an annual basis
COA 2: Develop new National Rehearsal Program commensurate with NEP

10. National Rehearsal Program
Endstate: A national rehearsal program that brings together disrupt/respond options to real world threat streams in a whole of government context
POA&M
Establish whole of government community of interest
Establish series of IPRs
Establish AW 11 as a pilot for the National Level Rehearsal
Conduct a senior CDC to discuss NLR 11
Initiate discussions among GO/FO/SES senior leaders
Conduct strategic level mission analysis and COA development
OPR: OSD(P), JS J7 and SOCOM OCR: COCOMs and interagency partners
MAR 10
APR 10
MAY 10
JUN 10
JUL 10
MAR 11
2012
Identified
issue
Develop
concept brief
Establish community of interest
AW 11 Senior level CDC
Initial strategic level MA and COA Dev
NLR 11 (AW 11) pilot
COA
decision

11. Training for Integrated Operations
- What We’ve Done
Where We’re Going
Mr. Frank DiGiovanni
ODUSD(Readiness)

12. Information Sharing – Update
Mr. Bill Barlow
OASD (Networks & Information Integration)
LTC Bob Klein
ODASD (Partnership Strategy & Stability Ops)

13. Air Combat Command’s ANGEL THUNDER
Lt Col Patrick Pope
ACC/A3J

14. National Intelligence Support Team
Maj Roland Sarino, NIST

15. BREAK

16. 2010 Interagency Logistics Symposium
CDR. Novak-Tibbet
USTRANSCOM

17. UN Humanitarian Civil-Military Coordination:
Response Operations and Training
Mr. Fred Polk & Mr. Michael Marks
UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

18. LUNCH

19. Reconstruction & Stabilization
FY10/11 Training, Exercises, Experiments
Mr. Eric Halzel
DoS, S/CRS

20. Provincial Reconstruction Team Lessons-Learned Project
Mr. Dale Erickson
Center for Complex Operations

21. Joint Training Information Management System
Mr. Gary Quay

22. Fy11/12 is first cycle for use as system of record
JTIMS
Fy11/12 is first cycle for use as system of record
COCOM use (positive/issues)
Services use
Reports
JS J-7 use
Quality of information
HQ vs. AOR support

23. DoD FY11/12 Interagency Support Requests
Mr. Rob Webster

24. Future Focus of Working Group
Mr. Gary Quay

25. WJTSC USG Interagency Working Group
Purpose:
Ensure DoD events promote an integrated operations approach
Promote interagency coordination and collaboration that improves civilian and military training and exercising for integrated operations
Improve the realism and quality of DoD exercises and experiments
Ensure DoD events meet the exercise and operational needs of interagency partners and DoD
Identify training and exercise issues and Plans of Action & Milestones
Organizations Invited to Attend:
USG Interagency Partners - Services
OSD - Combat Support Agencies
Joint Staff - National Guard Bureau
Combatant Commands

26. Purpose. - What should be the focus. - What can we accomplish
Purpose - What should be the focus? - What can we accomplish? - Who should attend Benefit to IA Partners - How can the WG benefit/assist IA Partners? - Is this forum appropriate for USG issues? Benefit to DoD - How can the WG assist the DoD attendees? Venue - Would a change increase attendance? - Couple with other conference? - Location?

27. Standing and New Issues
Mr. Gary Quay

28. Integration of Interagency Partners
Issue : Inadequate partner representation/environmental emulation in Combatant Command and Service training, education, exercises, and experimentation degrades the quality of these events.
Discussion: DOD recognizes the value of non-DOD partner participation in its exercises. Partner participation provides authoritative and realistic input and support to training events; however, satisfying participation requests is hampered by both interagency capacity to support and perceptions of shared objectives and value.
End State: DOD events reflect current policy and the complexity of integrated planning and operations.
POA&M: To enhance partner integration: 1. Identify and analyze participation gaps Develop potential mitigation strategies.
OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/HD, JS J-7 JETD; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB
1st Quarter FY 10
FY 09
SEP 09
Feb 10
MAR 10
FY10/11
FY 12
Implement process for FY 10/11
Year end assessment
Initiate Process for FY 11/12
Publish Draft
FY 10/11 Plan
Update at WJTSC 10-1
Complete POA&M
Interagency Process Effectively Supports DoD Exercises 28

29. Integration of Interagency Partners – WJTSC 10-2
Identify and analyze participation gaps.
How many agencies and departments did you invite to be part of the training audience for your events?
What academics could not be accomplished because a member of the IA did not participate?
What experimentation could not be completed because the IA community could not provide the required subject matter expertise?
What training objectives were not achieved because you did not have IA participation?
- For COCOMs, how many exercises conducted in the past year involved either the J5, JIACG, POLAD, SDA, SEA, or other imbedded interagency partners to help identify IA requirements and assisted in the invitation of IA participants?
2. Mitigation strategies. 29

30. BREAK

31. Training for Integrated Operations

32. Conference Theme: Training for Integrated Operations
Problem: Emerging and existing strategic guidance continues to emphasize a comprehensive approach involving all elements of U.S. national power, and involvement of other stakeholders, in a complex operational environment is becoming the norm in solving national security challenges. The level of synchronization and coordination to fully operationalize integrated activities requires focused preparation in joint training programs.
Background: DOD defines integrated operations as the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of DOD and other U.S. Government agencies’ activities, in coordination with partner nations, and non-governmental entities across the full range of military operations, which achieves a comprehensive approach that advances U.S. Government goals and objectives. DODD directs the combatant commands to establish and conduct integrated operations training as required by joint mission essential tasks.
Synonymous expressions such as “comprehensive approach” or “unified action” are variants of this DOD-defined term. Unified Action is defined as “the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of the activities of governmental and nongovernmental entities with military operations to achieve unity of effort.”
Chairman’s Joint Training Guidance, identifies “Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Nongovernmental Organization Coordination” as a Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff High Interest Training Issue for incorporation as appropriate into combatant command joint training programs.

33. Conference Theme Discussion
Training for Integrated Operations
Background: DODD defines integrated operations as the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of DOD and other U.S. Government agencies’ activities, in coordination with partner nations, and non-governmental entities across the full range of military operations, which achieves a comprehensive approach that advances U.S. Government goals and objectives.
DODD directs the combatant commands to establish and conduct integrated operations training as required by joint mission essential tasks.
Requirement: Questions to consider for your working group functional area of interest:
What are our priorities for the conduct of Integrated Operations Training?
What are the joint training requirements for Integrated Operations Training?
What gaps are identified that hinder effective Integrated Operations Training?
Bottom Line: How does integrated operations training change our joint training perspectives? 33

34. Training for Integrated Operations
Issue 10-xxx: Current integrated Civ-Mil training and exercise strategy, planning, resourcing and implementation is not adequate to support current and future integrated operations requirements.
Discussion:
DOD recognizes that we must train to effectively conduct Civ-Mil operations with non-DOD partners
Lack of a comprehensive DOD interagency engagement strategy, lack of a common civ-mil operating picture, and inadequate funding exacerbates the challenges of conducting integrated operations training.
End State: Partner integration in DoD training events facilitates a holistic collaborative approach to achieve National Security objectives and properly balance diplomacy, development, and defense.
POA&M: 1. Develop a comprehensive DOD strategy for engagement with interagency partners, including a funding strategy. 2. Develop a CJCSI that implements the DOD strategy and codifies processes for requesting interagency support. 3. Develop mission essential tasks that reflect partnership roles in integrated operations. 4. Assess readiness impact of interagency integration or lack thereof. 5. Establish an Interagency Training Community of Interest Portal.
OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/P, JS J-7; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB
AD HOC Efforts
JFCOM
IW IA
Requirements Div
Solutions Div
COCOMs
S/CRS
USDA
NTC
10th Mtn Div
CTCs
USMC
OIF
OEF
Camp Atterbury
Muscatatuck
FY10
FY10
FY10
FY10
FY10/11
FY 12
Assess Readiness Impact
Complete Strategy
Complete CJCSI
Develop METS
Develop TCOI Portal
DOD Training Effectively Supports Integrated Operations 34

35. Example of Integrated Operations Battle SpaceUN
Agencies
UNICEF
WFP
UNDP
For-profit
NGO
ICRC
BCT
NGO
UNHCR
NGO
Donor
Donor
Local
NGO
Disaster
Tourist
NGO
USG/Embassy
NGO
Other
Governments
Host Country
Government
Red Cross
For-profit
NGO
For-profit
BCT
Journalists
Disaster
Tourist 35

36. Synchronizing USG Efforts
GOOD TRAINING
10TH MTN
SSI
S/CRS
USJFCOM
USDA
CTCS
SYNCRONIZED
&
INTEGRATED
SERVICES
USAID
CAMP
ATTERBURY
COCOMS
NTC
MUSCATATUCK 36

37. Missed Civ-Mil Training Opportunities
H OM E
S T A T I O N
A C A D E M I C S
S T E A D Y
S T A T E
C I V
M I L
T N G
C I V S
T O
M I L I T A R Y
E V E N T S
M I L
T O
F S I
&
MU S C A T A T U C K
Army
Afghanistan
Regional
Provincial
District
Integrated
Operations
USMC
Issue:
- BG Abrams, NTC Commander, would like to have Afghanistan bound civilians participate in NTC training
- Similar issue with 10th Mtn SSI to have imbedded IA during pre-deployment and into deployment
- OIF - GEN Modern's opening remarks/comments during CTC/AAB VTC between USF-I and the CTCs-- -Good job by
CTCs in preparing BCTs for deployment to date. Need to replicate all players at CTCs--PRTs, NTM, USAID, UNAMI,
CJSOTF, etc.
- Interagency participation is a problem common among Services and COCOMs
- This brief limited to Afghanistan pre-deployment
Background Today:
- Political decisions drive civilian training for OEF and OIF
- OEF training is not synchronized or integrated
- All civilians going to Afghanistan get three weeks at FSI and train at Camp Atterbury (Muscatatuck); none go to NTC
DoS mission is to get boots on the ground in Afghanistan ASAP
minimum training has been acceptable to DoS
there is no compelling case for civilians to participate in DoD events
There are indications SRAP and Embassy Kabul will support training changes
- Civilians (FSOs) participate in OIF training at NTC
Supported by DoS NEA-I and US Embassy Baghdad
This group does not attend training at Camp Atterbury
Civ
Separate Tracks Result In Missed Opportunities for Integrated Training Prior to Deployment
- Need to leverage all opportunities to train together at existing venues
- Need to develop common operating picture by sharing vignettes and story lines

38. Training for Integrated Operations
Exercise Participation
Who coordinates training within civilian agencies (CRC & non-CRC)
Who acts as training audience and who develops exercise
How are civilian training objectives developed
Are the COCOM JELC and Service training cycles structured to facilitate integrated training
Do Army and USMC unit training venues accommodate civ-mil training
Is the military taking advantage of training at civilian venues
How does DoD determine civilian agency priorities and interests
How do does the USG identify civ-mil integration requirements and interests
Are contracted role players adequately replicating current civilian agency issues/operations
Who pays for civ-mil integrated operations training
AD HOC Efforts
JFCOM
IW IA
Requirements Div
Solutions Div
COCOMs
S/CRS
USDA
NTC
10th Mtn Div
CTCs
USMC
OIF
OEF
Camp Atterbury
Muscatatuck 38

39. Training for Integrated Operations
Issue 10-xxx: Current integrated operations training and exercise strategy, planning, resourcing and implementation is not adequate to support current and future integrated operations requirements. [DODD ]
Discussion:
DOD recognizes that we must train to effectively conduct integrated operations with non-DOD partners
Lack of a comprehensive DOD interagency engagement strategy, lack of a common integrated operating picture, and inadequate funding exacerbates the challenges of conducting integrated operations training.
End State: Integrated operations training events achieve USG national security objectives.
POA&M: 1. Develop a comprehensive DOD training strategy that reflects the operating environment, particularly for engagement with interagency partners, including a funding strategy Press for a national strategy. 3. Develop a CJCSI that implements the DOD strategy and codifies processes for requesting interagency support. 4. Review mission essential tasks and validate with interagency partners. 5. Assess readiness impact of interagency integration or lack thereof. 6. Establish an Interagency Training Community of Interest Portal.
OPRs: OSD/P&R, OSD/P, JS J-7; OCRs: Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and NGB
AD HOC Efforts
JFCOM
IW IA
Requirements Div
Solutions Div
COCOMs
S/CRS
USDA
NTC
10th Mtn Div
CTCs
USMC
OIF
OEF
Camp Atterbury
Muscatatuck
FY10
FY10
FY10
FY10
FY10/11
FY 12
Assess Readiness Impact
Complete Strategy
Complete CJCSI
Develop METS
Develop TCOI Portal
DOD Training Effectively Supports Integrated Operations 39

40. National Rehearsal Program

41. National Rehearsal Program
Issue 10-xxx: The current NEP does not adequately facilitate the exercise of real world international threat streams and adversaries. Consequently, combatant commands cannot realistically exercise their contingency plans with interagency partners if they link to the NEP.
Discussion:
Recent CMX and PR/AWGSE 10 SLS discussions indentified the requirement for a National Level Rehearsal
Domestic incident management does not incorporate international threat streams and disrupt/respond options
Requirement for an exercise construct with senior whole of government integration for maximum collaboration and participation
Requirement for a senior level rehearsal program with flexibility to keep ahead of current threats
Requires exercise integration of real world threat streams on an annual basis (Example: CT, Cyber, WMD)
Requirement to partner with interagency during development and execution of National Level Rehearsal
COA 1: Enhance/modify current NEP construct developing exercise framework addressing actual OCONUS threats on an annual basis
COA 2: Develop new National Rehearsal Program commensurate with NEP

42. National Rehearsal Program
Endstate: A national rehearsal program that brings together disrupt/respond options to real world threat streams in a whole of government context
POA&M
Establish whole of government community of interest
Establish series of IPRs
Establish AW 11 as a pilot for the National Level Rehearsal
Conduct a senior CDC to discuss NLR 11
Initiate discussions among GO/FO/SES senior leaders
Conduct strategic level mission analysis and COA development
OPR: OSD(P), JS J7 and SOCOM OCR: COCOMs and interagency partners
MAR 10
APR 10
MAY 10
JUN 10
JUL 10
MAR 11
2012
Identified
issue
Develop
concept brief
Establish community of interest
AW 11 Senior level CDC
Initial strategic level MA and COA Dev
NLR 11 (AW 11) pilot
COA
decision

43. Conference Theme Discussion
Training for Integrated Operations
Background: DODD defines integrated operations as the synchronization, coordination, and/or integration of DOD and other U.S. Government agencies’ activities, in coordination with partner nations, and non-governmental entities across the full range of military operations, which achieves a comprehensive approach that advances U.S. Government goals and objectives.
DODD directs the combatant commands to establish and conduct integrated operations training as required by joint mission essential tasks.
Requirement: Questions to consider for your working group functional area of interest:
What are our priorities for the conduct of Integrated Operations Training?
What are the joint training requirements for Integrated Operations Training?
What gaps are identified that hinder effective Integrated Operations Training?
Bottom Line: How does integrated operations training change our joint training perspectives? 43

44. Questions??

45. Working Group Wrap Up & Closing Remarks
Mr. Gary Quay

46. DoD COCOM & Services Breakout
Mr. Gary Quay

47. How Can JS J-7 Better Support
How Can JS J-7 Better Support? TCOI Portal Quarterly Status Reports Requirements Process Cycle ??

48. Requirements Process Cycle
4th Quarter
1st Quarter
WJTSC
Publish and Distribute year DOD Interagency Participation Plan and Interagency Participation Plan
VTC
Collect DOD
Requirements
2 years out
VTC
Source Requirements
Develop DOD Interagency Participation Plan
Present Plan to EXCOM
WJTSC
Present DOD opportunities
to Interagency for fill
Review interagency
requests for support
Lock 2-year requirements
3rd Quarter
2nd Quarter

49. BACK-UP

50. Topic 3: National Level Rehearsal Concept
UNCLASSIFIED
Topic 3: National Level Rehearsal Concept
Full DoD/IA
NSC Oversight
CT focus
Real INTEL
CT Objectives
Requirements
Senior JS / OSD and IA
Combatant Commands
SecDef/CJCS Approval
NSC Oversight
Presidential Policy Directive (commensurate with DHS NEP IP)
AW 11
NLR
Currently Nonexistent
AW 10
Full DoD
Partial/Episodic IA
CMX 6.2
AW 10 SLS
CMX 6.1
CMX 6.0
CEP
Domestic / HD focus
No IA for OCONUS CT
Universal Adversary
Natural Disasters
NLE 09
NEP
NEP
Partial/Episodic GCC
No IA
Limited JS
AF 09
AW 08
IF 09
JEP
2008
2009
2010
2011
Notes/Definitions
AW – Exercise ABLE WARRIOR JEP – Joint Exercise Program NEP – National Exercise Program
AF – Exercise ABLE FOCUS CEP – Chairman’s Exercise Program NLE – National Level Exercise (part of NEP)
IF – Exercise INTERNAL FOCUS CMX – Crisis Management Exercise NLR – National Level Rehearsal
SLS – Senior Leadership Seminar
UNCLASSIFIED 50 50 50

51. Joint Staff J-7 Roles & Responsibilities
Focal point for DOD entities for U.S. Government Interagency participation in their training, education, exercises, and experiments
Focal point for U.S. Government Interagency Community for DOD participation in their training, education, exercises, and experiments
Standardize the request and sourcing process
Collate requirements from both DOD and the U.S. Government Interagency Community
Present opportunities to Interagency Community
Identify gaps

52. DOD Interface With Interagency Partners
FY 09 will be the transition year
FY09 Activities:
Planning is in progress; JS J-7 will facilitate coordination of FY09 support as needed
DOD will develop interagency processes and relationships with interagency partners
DOD will identify and present FY10/11 USG Interagency event opportunities to interagency partners
JS J-7 will coordinate interagency requests for DOD support
JS J-7 will publish Interagency Participation Plans

53. Interagency Participation Plan
Joint Staff J-7 will prepare an Interagency Participation Plan to present DOD events to interagency partners for consideration
Plan Attributes:
Common language
Integration of role of Interagency Management System components, Essential Tasks lists, Major Mission Elements, other agency specific considerations
Sufficiently detailed to provide clear training objectives
Engages interagency partners early in the Joint Event Life Cycle
Conveys mutual benefits of interagency participation and facilitates interagency selection of events for participation
Unclassified

54. Exercises and Training (U)
UNCLASSIFIED
Exercises and Training (U)
LTC Curtis Hubbard
J7/9 E&I, Exercises
24 MAR 10
UNCLASSIFIED 54

55. Purpose (U)
Receive approval and/or guidance on the USSOCOM training / exercise framework (Topic 1)
Provide “National Level Rehearsal” Concept and receive guidance (Topic 2) 55 55 55

56. Topic 1: Training / Exercise Framework56 56 56

57. Topic 1: Training / Exercise Framework (U)
1 X ABLE WARRIOR annually (J7/9)
1-2 X ABLE FOCUS annually (J7/9)
2 X Senior leader seminar/Counterterrorism Executive Rehearsals (CTER) (J7/9)
Quarterly outreach to Combatant Commands and JS/OSD (J35)
1 X National Level Exercise (J7/9)
Must be CT related and support USSOCOM objectives
Next potential event: FY 12 (Cyber)
1 X GCC ELLIPSE (minimum) with response cell (J7/9)
1 X support to other CT exercise with response cell (J7/9)
CMX(s) (J7/9)
2 X monthly internal USSOCOM battlestaff training events (J35)
Quarterly USSOCOM ESC training events (J35)
2 X Semi-Annual Exercise Conferences for ELLIPSE scheduling (J7/9) 57 57 57

58. Training / Exercise Proposed Schedule (U)
ABLE WARRIOR: Mar 11 (National Level Rehearsal)
ABLE FOCUS: Aug 10
Scenario: LeT/Commonwealth Games
Inclusion of GCC action officers in the exercise control group
GCC ELLIPSE with USSOCOM response cell
Recommendation: Support ELLIPSE with EUCOM
Counterterrorism Executive Rehearsals:
Sep 10 (post ABLE FOCUS and prior to Commonwealth Games)
Feb 11 (prior to start of ABLE WARRIOR)
Senior outreach visit to USNORTHCOM (prior to NLE 10 in May)
CMX 11: 13 Apr 10 (CJCS participation)
CMX 10: 14 Jun 10 (CJCS participation)
Quarterly USSOCOM ESC training events: Jun, Sep, and Dec 10 58 58 58

59. Topic 2: National Level Rehearsal Concept59 59 59

60. National Level Rehearsal (Background) (U)
A “National Level Rehearsal” program does not currently exist
CMX 6 series identified the requirement to rehearse national level processes to disrupt and/or respond to a CT event
PR/AWGSE 10 Senior Leader Seminar (SLS) identified the requirement for a “National Level Rehearsal Program”
Senior DoD/interagency participation required
Rehearsal should be validated at the National Security Council level
Chairman’s Exercise Program garners ad hoc and episodic interagency participation (not a “forcing function”)
National Level Exercise Program (DHS lead) has not / cannot meet “National Rehearsal” requirements as defined in the SLS
Consequence Management / HD focus vs. OCONUS disrupt / respond
Universal Adversary vs. “Real world” threat streams
Not flexible (themes planned on 5 year cycle)
Majority of NLE scenarios focus on natural disasters vs. terrorism 60

61. National Level Rehearsal (NLR) (U)
ABLE WARRIOR 11 should be elevated to “National Level Rehearsal” status and receive whole of National Security apparatus participation
NLR aspects
National Security Council directed objectives
Strategic / National Command Post Exercise
DoD supported event as Executive Agent
Interagency partnered in the development and execution process
Principal/Deputies, Undersecretaries and CDRs participation
Flexible and scaleable to current threat streams and most likely/most dangerous enemy courses of action
Annual execution
Intermediate events (SLS, CTER, TTX, Seminars)
Requirements
Codified similar to National Exercise Program Implementation Plan (DHS) and/or Presidential Policy Directive 61

62. Recommendations (U)
Approve Training / Exercise framework and associated calendar
Approve and request JS to prioritize/schedule CTER 10 in Sep 10
JS provide “top-down” message to all GCCs
Approve concept to begin planning for ABLE WARRIOR National Level Rehearsal 11 as a pilot program
Request JS J-3 to direct applicable JS equities to initiate National Level Rehearsal program development
Request JS to designate USSOCOM as Supported Commander for planning and execution
Establish NLR as a Global Synchronization Conference topic
Initiate Commander to Commander discussions in preparation for SECDEF and CJCS briefs
Initial dates: Mar 11 62 62 62

63. BACKUP 63 63 63

64. USSOCOM Exercise Program Concept (U)
Internal USSOCOM TSP Training/Exercises
Battlestafff AOs (weekly/monthly training )
ESC/SOSTs (quarterly training)
ABLE FOCUS
External GCC Battlestaff Training/Exercises
Outreach training teams
USSOCOM support to GCC exercises (ELLIPSE, event or AOR specific)
ABLE FOCUS + (GCC support to USSOCOM internal exercises)
JS/OSD and IA Senior Engagement
CMX, CT BOD, J2/J3 conferences, OPS DEP, etc.
AOR specific/unique event exercises (Commonwealth Games, Olympics, etc.)
USG senior leader seminars, support to IA exercises, IA observes DoD exercises
ABLE WARRIOR National Level Rehearsal
Prioritized equivalent exercise as NLE; focused on national CT framework and USG actions
Whole of government senior participation (NSC, IA, JS, OSD and GCCs) using real world intelligence
Includes SLS series with senior whole of government participation 64

65. AW National Level Rehearsal
*Timeline (U)
UNCLASSIFIED
APR 10
MAY 10
JUN 10
JUL 10
AUG 10
SEP 10
CMX 11
Observe NC (NLE 10)
CMX 10 & ESC event
ABLE FOCUS
CTER 1 & ESC event
GSC
EUCOM ELLIPSE
OCT 10
NOV 10
DEC 10
JAN 11
FEB 11
MAR 11
GSC
ESC event
CTER 2
AW National Level Rehearsal
CMX: Crisis Management Exercise
NLE: National Level Exercise
AF: ABLE FOCUS
AW: ABLE WARRIOR
ESC: Executive Steering Committee
*Notes
2X Monthly AO / TSP training events not included
Quarterly GCC/JS/OSD/IA outreach events not included
UNCLASSIFIED 65

66. Counterterrorism Executive Rehearsal (CTER) Concept (U)
The initial SLS event supporting FY 11 ABLE WARRIOR National Level Rehearsal
CTER 10 execution window: Sep 10 (post ABLE FOCUS and prior to Commonwealth Games)
JS directed SLS event to ensure full participation
Senior DoD and Interagency participation is a requirement
JS maintains lead on achieving senior participation (Chairman’s prioritized event)
“Real world” threat streams 66

67. CTER 10 Concept (U) Two day event
Participants: OSD/JS, Combatant Commands, NCTC and IA
Day 1: TSP/7520 DoD staff rehearsal
Focus: Global mission analysis based on real world threat streams; rehearse CONPLAN DoD TSP collaboration processes and FRO refinement
Level: O6 and below action officers
Time: Eight hours
Day 2: DoD / IA Senior Leader Seminar (two hours)
Focus: IA and DoD senior leader CT plans and policy discussions referencing Day 1 analysis, CMX and SLS outputs
Level: Principal/Deputies (if available), Undersecretaries, Commanders and Directors
Time: Two hours
Scenario: TBD based upon participants and scope 67 67 67

68. Day 1: TSP/7520 DoD staff rehearsal
CTER 10 Objectives (U)
Day 1: TSP/7520 DoD staff rehearsal
Rehearse Global Disrupt planning and CONPLAN DoD TSP collaboration processes
Provide DoD and Interagency senior leadership timely and appropriate analysis of the strategic situation and response options
Brief results to USSOCOM J3
Day 2: DoD / IA Senior Leader Seminar (two hours)
Review Day 2 Global Mission Analysis Brief
Review/discuss current authorities, disrupt triggers and the CT Strategic Framework (reference CMX 6 series and AW SLS outputs)
Improve TSP procedures within DoD and Interagency to ensure unity of effort during planning, and assist in the refinement of global counter options to inform senior USG decision-making
Discuss and provide guidance for the ABLE WARRIOR Nation Level Rehearsal planning effort 68 68 68