1. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 1 Method/Process = step-by-step description of the steps involved in doing a particular job No two projects are ever identical, so method is specific to one project Methodology = set of general principles that guide the choice of a method suited to a specific task or project methodology or process?

2. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 2 method/process vs methodology Level of abstraction Typical product Task Specific version of a class diagram Technique Any UML class diagram Method/Process A product costing system Methodology Example of application Developing a first-cut class diagram Description of how to carry out a technique, e.g. UML class modelling Specific techniques used on a particular project that lead to a specific software product General selection and sequence of techniques capable of producing a range of software products A range of business software applications

3. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 3 typical participatory design lifecycle

4. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 4 elements of a methodology Technique: the UML class diagram Tool: Rational Rose (CASE software) Procedure: Find classes by inspecting use case descriptions Structure: Operation specifications should not be written until class model is stable (also the stages) Stages: Inception, Elaboration, Construction… Activities: Requirements, Analysis, Design… Philosophy: OO development promotes software which is robust and resilient to change

5. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 5 Unified Software Development Process (USDP) Public domain methodology for Object-Oriented software development Main principles: Use-case driven Architecture-centric Iterative development Incremental development

6. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 6 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Software_Development_Process Unified Software Development Process (USDP)

7. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 7 Agile Unified ProcessAgile Unified Process (AUP), a lightweight variation developed by Scott W. AmblerScott W. Ambler Basic Unified ProcessBasic Unified Process (BUP), a lightweight variation developed by IBM and aIBM precursor to OpenUPOpenUP Enterprise Unified ProcessEnterprise Unified Process (EUP), an extension of the Rational Unified Process Essential Unified ProcessEssential Unified Process (EssUP), a lightweight variation developed by Ivar JacobsonIvar Jacobson Open Unified ProcessOpen Unified Process (OpenUP), the Eclipse Process Framework software development process Rational Unified ProcessRational Unified Process (RUP), the IBM / Rational Software development processIBMRational Software Oracle Unified MethodOracle Unified Method (OUM), the Oracle development and implementation processOracle Rational Unified Process-System Engineering (RUP-SE), a version of RUP tailored by Rational SoftwareRational Software for System EngineeringSystem Engineering Unified Software Development Process (USDP)

8. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 8 Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM) = a management and control framework for Rapid Application Development Prototyping DSDM fixes resources for the project, fixes the time available and then sets out to deliver only what can be achieved within these constraints The DSDM life cycle has these phases: feasibility study business study functional model iteration (using prototypes) design and build iteration (continue with prototypes) implementation

9. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 9 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DSDM Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM)

10. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 10

11. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 11

12. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 12 DSDM is based upon 9 underlying principles 1.Active user involvement is imperative. 2.DSDM teams are empowered to make decisions including refining or changing requirements without the direct involvement of higher management. 3.The focus is on frequent product delivery. A team delivers product(s) within a timebox (2 – 6 weeks) and adopts the most appropriate approach. 4.Fitness for purpose is the key criterion. DSDM is geared to delivering essential functionality at the specified time. 5.Iterative and incremental development is necessary to converge on an accurate business solution. Incremental development allows user feedback to inform later development.

13. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 13 DSDM is based upon 9 underlying principles 6.All changes during development are reversible. This allows inappropriate iterations to be undone. 7.Requirements are initially agreed at a high level. These provide objectives for prototyping and can be investigated by the teams. Normally the scope of the high level requirements are not changed significantly. 8.Testing is integrated throughout the life cycle — this is essential with an incremental approach. Developers test for technical compliance, user team members for functional compliance. 9.A collaborative and co-operative approach between all stakeholders is essential. Includes resource managers and quality assurance teams.

14. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 14 Principles of Extreme Programming (XP) Communication - XP highlights the importance of good communication among developers and between developers and users. Simplicity - XP focuses on the simplest solution for the immediate known requirements. Feedback - Feedback in XP is geared to giving the developers frequent and timely feedback from users and also in terms of test results. Work estimates are based on the work actually completed in the previous iteration. Courage - Urges the developer to throw away code that is not quite correct and start again. Essentially the developer has to leave unproductive lines of development despite personal investment in the ideas.

15. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 15 Based on user stories that describe the requirements –written by the user –the basis of project planning and the development of test harnesses Very similar to use cases though some proponents of XP suggest that there are key differences in granularity –typical user story is about three sentences with no technology indicated –developers get detailed descriptions from the customer when they start developing Best suited to projects with a relatively small number of programmers—say no more than ten Critical to maintain clear communicative code and to have rapid feedback (If these are not possible then XP would be problematic) XP not sympathetic to using UML for analysis & design Principles of Extreme Programming (XP)

16. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 16 XP Activities The planning game involves quickly defining the scope of the next release from user priorities and technical estimates. The plan is updated regularly as the iteration progresses. The information system should be delivered in small releases that incrementally build up functionality through rapid iteration. A unifying metaphor or high level shared story focuses the development. The system should be based on a simple design. Programmers prepare unit tests in advance of software construction and customers define acceptance tests. The programme code should be restructured to remove duplication, simplify the code and improve flexibility (refactoring).

17. University of Toronto at Scarborough © Kersti Wain-Bantin CSCC40 other methodologies 17 Pair programming means that code is written by two programmers using one workstation. The code is owned collectively and anyone can change any code. The system is integrated and built frequently each day. This gives the opportunity for regular testing and feedback. Normally staff should work no more than forty hours a week. A user should be a full-time member of the team. All programmers should write code according to agreed standards that emphasise good communication through the code. XP Activities