1. [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification Review for [RELATED ENTITIES] [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [Presenter Name, Title] Closing Presentation [Month Day, Year] [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]

2. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY2 Thanks [Thanks to Entity Management] [Thanks to Entity Certification Review Team] [Thanks to ???????] [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

3. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY3 Topics to Review Certification Review Process and Team Members Positives Bucket Items Post Certification Review Tentative Timeline and Reminders Feedback Questions and Answers [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

4. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY4 Standards Reviewed [Standard 1 i.e. EOP-008-0 ][Standard Title] [Standard 2 ][Standard Title] [Standard 3 ][Standard Title] [Standard 4 ][Standard Title] [Standard 5 ][Standard Title] [Standard 6 ][Standard Title] [Standard … ][Standard Title] [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

5. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY5 NERC (BA) (RC) (TOP) Certification Review Certification Review Process Performed Per the NERC Rules of Procedure Section 500 and Appendix 5A The Certification Review Team [Team Leader 1 (CTL)][Company affiliation] [Team Member 2][Company affiliation] [Team Member 3][Company affiliation] [Team Member 4][Company affiliation] [Team Member 5][Company affiliation] [Team Member 6][Company affiliation] [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

6. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY6 Positives Practice that will support/improve the reliability of the BES [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

7. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY7 Positives (Cont.) Practice that will support/improve the reliability of the BES [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

8. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY8 This slide is for info only Use one of the next two slides.

9. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY9 Bucket 1 Items Certification Review Team recommends a full certification based on the following conclusions: 1 st Issue – Based on the following evidence 2 nd Issue – Based on the following evidence 3 rd Issue – Based on the following evidence [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

10. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY10 Bucket 1 Items There were no issues the Certification Review Team found that would prevent a recommendation of certification review approval. [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

11. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY11 Bucket 2 Items The following items must be closed prior to certification review approval: Issue – Evidence required [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

12. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY12 Bucket 2 Items (Cont.) Issue – Evidence required [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

13. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY13 Bucket 3 Items The following items are suggestions the Entity might consider to improve reliability and/or performance: Suggestion These will not be included in the Final Summary Report [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

14. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY14 Bucket 3 Items (Cont.) Suggestion [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

15. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY15 Post Certification Review Tentative Timeline NOTE: following dates are anticipated and subject to change Closure of all Bucket 2 items by [Date] A draft report will be provided to [Entity Name] by [Date After bucket 2 items closed] [Entity Name] to review draft report and return by [Date]  If [Entity Name] disagrees with the CRT conclusions, this should be communicated in writing immediately to NERC nerc.certification@nerc.net and clearly state the reasons for disagreement.nerc.certification@nerc.net [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

16. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY16 Post Certification Review Tentative Timeline (Cont) The final Summary Report, with [Entity Name]’s comments included where appropriate, will be reviewed by [REGIONAL ENTITY] management and upon approval, transmitted to [Entity Name] and submitted by [REGIONAL ENTITY] to NERC Approval by [DATE]. The official letter confirming that a full certification is not required will be submitted [ENTITY] by NERC on [DATE]. NERC Alert needs to be advised if a change in Registration is effected. [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

17. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY17 [Entity Name] Feedback [Entity Name]’s feedback of the Certification Review process is sincerely requested. The ERO strives for continuous improvement, and tracks and reviews all feedback.  Feedback forms will be provided via email.  Please be candid when filling in the forms whether it is comments regarding the process, the feedback forms and/or the CRT performance.  Note that the feedback does not require naming the author of the feedback.  Please return the completed form to [RE Email] as soon as possible. [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]

18. RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY18 [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]