Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMark Robertson Modified over 9 years ago
1
2003 Paul VanRaden, Melvin Tooker,* Ashley Sanders, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD paul@aipl.arsusda.gov Quality of Data Included in Genetic Evaluations for Daughter Pregnancy Rate
2
ADSA Phoenix (2) Melvin Tooker 2003 Evaluation Methods BLUP Animal Model Same programs used for yield, PL, SCS Adjust for regional, seasonal and parity differences. Convert to preg rate = (233-DO) / 4
3
ADSA Phoenix (3) Melvin Tooker 2003 Average breed effects across regions and time by calving month
4
ADSA Phoenix (4) Melvin Tooker 2003 Parity Pre-Adjustments Initiated May 2003 ParityHolsteinJersey 1 st 0 0 2 nd - 4.1 - 3.7 3 rd - 7.1 - 5.6 4 th - 11.7 - 9.4 5 th - 16.7 - 13.4
5
ADSA Phoenix (5) Melvin Tooker 2003 Pregnancy Rate Evaluation Data Sources Days open reported, verified calving interval. No calving interval, days open reported. No breeding date reported, next calf. No breeding reported, no next calf. Sold for reproductive reasons, days open set to 250. Pregnancy verification codes have been available since 2002.
6
ADSA Phoenix (6) Melvin Tooker 2003 Pregnancy Rate Evaluation Records considered complete at 250 DIM Lower limit set to 50 DO 5% of records Upper limit set to 250 DO 14% of records
7
ADSA Phoenix (7) Melvin Tooker 2003 AYBSGUHOJEMS Breeding date verified by next calving date 555448576453 Breeding date disagrees with next calving date 6 8 8 5 5 8 Breeding date but no next calving date 161520191716 Next calving date, but no breeding reported 7 9 8 6 611 Cows sold for reproductive problems 6 5 5 5 3 4 No information for fertility 10 911 8 5 8 Sources of Fertility Data 1998-1999
8
ADSA Phoenix (8) Melvin Tooker 2003 May 2003 Evaluation Holstein data from May 2003 evaluation 40 million lactations 16 million cows Example evaluations: Data for recent, well-sampled bulls Actual bull evaluations
9
ADSA Phoenix (9) Melvin Tooker 2003 Older Bull Evaluations (May 2003) BullRELDODPRPLNM$ Duster99- 9.6+2.4+4.3+451 Bellwood99- 0.8+0.2-0.5+353 Mandel99+7.2- 1.8-0.7+244 Luke99+9.2- 2.3-1.8+136 Mountain99- 4.4+1.1 +280 Mascot99+3.2- 0.8-2.9+20
10
ADSA Phoenix (10) Melvin Tooker 2003 Bulls ranked by Net Merit May 2003 Bull DPR PLNet Merit $ O Manfred Justice 0.4 3.1759 Vision-Gen Ozzie- 0.7 0.6692 Emerald Dawson- 1.1 0.9675 Pagen-Ernwood- 1.3 2.2630 Ricecrest Marshall- 1.7- 0.1625 Carol Prel. Mtoto- 1.5 2.0607 Windsor Machoman 1.1 3.0598 C.-Corner Defense 0.0 2.6593
11
ADSA Phoenix (11) Melvin Tooker 2003 Future Directions Pregnancy rate will be included in Net Merit. Fertility records will be used earlier in lactation. DPR can be used in multi-trait PL. Fertility database and formats will be improved.
12
ADSA Phoenix (12) Melvin Tooker 2003 Format 5 - Reproductive Records Animal ID, sire ID, dam ID, X-ref ID Animal herd code information Reproductive segments: Date of event, code for actual or estimated date Includes many events, service sire ID
13
ADSA Phoenix (13) Melvin Tooker 2003 Format 5 - Reproductive Event Codes H Observed in estrus (heat) but not inseminated S Synchronized estrus event (injection or other methods) A Artificial insemination N Natural service breeding E Embryo donation
14
ADSA Phoenix (14) Melvin Tooker 2003 Format 5 - Reproductive Event Codes... IEmbryo implantation PConfirmed pregnant OConfirmed not pregnant (open) XCow given a “do not breed” designation DDelete event(s) for this “date of event”
15
ADSA Phoenix (15) Melvin Tooker 2003 Format 5 in the Future: Separate estrus expression and conception rate (female fertility) Service sire fertility (male fertility) Keep track of ALL service sires, number and type of services, not just the most recent
16
ADSA Phoenix (16) Melvin Tooker 2003 Conclusions Most herds are reporting accurate breeding dates. Records currently used only if complete (250 DIM). More reproductive events will be obtained in the future. More accurate and complete data will provide better fertility evaluations for farmers and industry.
17
ADSA Phoenix (17) Melvin Tooker 2003 Acknowledgments All DHIA herds and processing centers contributed data Lillian Bacheller for work on improving the fertility database John Clay suggested expressing cow fertility as pregnancy rate
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.