2. 2

3. TRAFFIC RECORDS INFORMATION SYSTEMS Crashes Driver Records Vehicle Information Roadways Citation & Adjudication Injury Surveillance & EMS 9 Core Highway Safety Databases

4. CRASH DATA (WSDOT) Time & Location Driver & Occupants Weather Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) Vehicles 10

5. DRIVER RECORDS (DOL)  Name, Address, and License Number  Age, Date of Birth, and Gender  License Status  Driver History  Driver Training 5

6. VEHICLE INFORMATION (DOL) Owner Information Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) License Plate Number Vehicle Year/ Make/Model Commercial Motor Vehicles 6

7. ROADWAY DATA (WSDOT)  Location  Classification  Roadway Condition  Number of Lanes  Shoulder Type and Width  Median Descriptors  Traffic Control Devices  Pavement Types  Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) 7

8. LAW ENFORCEMENT (WSP’s SECTOR) AND ADJUDICATION (AOC)  Citation & Adjudication Tracking  Prosecution  Conviction  Sentencing  Recidivism 8

9. INJURY SURVEILLANCE (DOH)  Hospital Assessment of Injury Severity  Length and Cost of a Hospital Stay  Length and Cost of Rehabilitation  EMS Response Time  Emergency Department  Death Records 9

10. DATA QUALITY METRICS Timeliness Accuracy Completeness Uniformity Integration Accessibility 10

11. OTHER TYPES OF DATA  Demographic Data  Behavioral Data  Seatbelt and CPS observation surveys  Previously Attitudes, Knowledge, and Awareness survey -> Statewide Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS)  Safety Program Evaluation Data  Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) 11

12. FATALITY ANALYSIS REPORTING SYSTEM (FARS) at WTSC  Census of Fatal Traffic Crashes  Crash  Vehicles  People involved  Data Gathered from State and Other Data Sources  Police accident reports  Driver/vehicle data systems  Hospital/EMS reports  Vital records  Coroner/medical examiner reports  Transmitted to NHTSA Daily 12

13. 13

14. WHY ARE THEY WORTH YOUR ATTENTION?  MAP-21 405(c) Incentive grants  Traffic Records Committee  Highway Safety Plan  Annual Report  Strategic Highway Safety Plan: Target Zero 6

15. 405(c) INCENTIVE GRANTS  Historically between $700,000 – $800,000 per year Washington must meet eligibility requirements Unspent funds may roll over, up to 3 years  Must be spent on Traffic Records projects, per “Use of Funds”  Specific projects reviewed and approved by the TRC  March/April/May 15

16. SECTION 405(c) – ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS 16  Traffic Records Committee (TRC) Meets at least three times/year Be chartered or legally mandated Have multidisciplinary membership Have a designated TRCC coordinator  State Traffic Records Strategic Plan approved by the TRC Last update 2009 Updated scheduled for Q4 2014/Q1 2015

17. SECTION 405(c) – ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS (CONT.) 17  Demonstrated Quantitative Progress in at Least One Significant Data Program Attribute  Traffic Records Assessment within the Last Five Years –> 2014!  Maintain aggregate expenditures from all State and Local sources at or above the average level of such expenditures from FY2010 and FY2011

18. SECTION 405(c)– USE OF FUNDS 18  Data Program Improvements to Core Highway Safety Databases  Improvements must be quantifiable and measurable in program data quality metrics (accuracy, completeness, timeliness, uniformity, accessibility, or integration)

19. TRAFFIC RECORDS COMMITTEE  Oversee Planning and Improvement of State’s Traffic Records Systems  Develop, Implement, and Monitor the Strategic Plan  Approve Strategic Plan and Implementation Plan Annually  Influence Agency Policy Decisions that Impact the State’s Traffic Records Systems  Identify Performance Measures and Monitor Progress  Provide Meaningful Coordination Among Stakeholders 19

20. TRAFFIC RECORDS COMMITTEE 20 Data Integration Sub-committee

21. WTSC (SHSO) TRAFFIC RECORDS COORDINATOR  Highway Safety Office’s Traffic Records Coordinator  Traffic records champion  Liaison with Federal agencies regarding strategic plan  Point of contact for traffic records funding and issues  Supports TRC Oversight Coucil; Chair of TRC Workgroup  Manages Traffic Records grants (Agreements, quarterly reports, reinbursements)  Outreach and Education to “Sell the Vision”  Website  Conference presentations  Training  Request Technical Assistance Strong SHSO support and leadership is vital to the effectiveness and quality outcomes of a state TRC. 21

22. eTRIP Sub-Committee 22 eTRIP Governance Team Executive Leadership Team Judicial Services Director Assistant Director, Driver Services Director Manager, Statewide Travel and Collision Data Office Chief Technical Officer Senior Policy Advisor DES Representative WSP Representative (ITD, FOB) WSDOT Representative WTSC Representative DOL Representative AOC Representative WSDOTWSPOCIOAOCDOLWTSC Operations Managers Team Local Law Enforcement/ WASPC

23. Data Integration Sub-committee  Formed by the TRC in March 2009 to identify solutions to link crash events and injury records (identified as a gap in the 2009 Traffic Records Assessment)  The subcommittee will meet monthly to review, discuss successes and resolve barriers to data linking, to review and assist with analyses of the linked files, and to develop policies and strategies to accomplish this work now and in the future.  In April 2014, WTSC hired Project employee Joyce Fan to: Begin testing methods and developing processes Lead the sub-committee 3 Year commitment by TRC 23

24. STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN Your participation in the SHSP, which is viewed by the U.S. DOT as Washington's comprehensive transportation safety plan, is imperative to the plan’s success.  Updated every 3-5 years and submitted to FHWA  Identifies and Analyzes Highway Safety Problems and Opportunities on All Public Roads  Is Developed in Consultation with a Broad Range of Safety Stakeholders  Includes the 4(or 5) Es of Safety 24

25. HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN  Summited by WTSC every July, detailing active projects to reduce fatalities and serous injuries  The Highway Safety Plan uses data to:  Identify the state’s top highway safety problems  Establish overall highway safety performance measure targets  Report progress in meeting prior year performance measure targets 20

26. ANNUAL REPORT  Effectiveness of Programs And Initiatives  Progress in HSP Meeting Performance Targets 26

27. 15

28. www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811644.pdf TRAFFIC RECORDS PROGRAM ASSESSMENT ADVISORY  Guidance on Traffic Records Data Collection, Management, and Analysis  Describes IDEAL Traffic Records System  Contents  Capabilities  Data Quality  Approach for Traffic Records Assessment 16

29. MODEL PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR STATE TRAFFIC RECORDS SYSTEMS  Quantify Systemic Improvements to Traffic Records Systems  Develop and Track Performance Goals  TR Strategic Plan  Highway Safety Plan  Establish Measures for Specific Traffic Records Projects  Support Data Improvement Goals in the SHSP http://ww -nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/81 4 1.pdf 17

30. NHTSA GO TEAMS  Provide Technical Assistance or Training to Improve Traffic Records Data Collection, Management, and Analysis Capabilities  Small group of one to three subject matter experts  Address a smaller scale, short- to medium-term need  Requests should address a specific traffic records improvement need  Identified by the TRCC and SHSO http://ww.nhtsa.gov/Data/Traf ic+Records 19

31. EXAMPLE GO TEAMS TOPICS Data Integration: Evaluate available databases and facilitate discussion between data custodians to allow sharing and integration between agencies and suggest how integrated data could be used to identify problems and recommend and evaluate countermeasures Injury Surveillance: Facilitate discussions with data managers and help explain the importance of linking injury data with crash data, how data will be used, and address confidentiality concerns in order to move towards a data sharing agreement or MOU Citation/Adjudication: Help develop a “law table” to interpret the local charges and help States harmonize local and state statute citations so that more accurate data can be collected Source: NHTSA, “Requesting a NHTSA Go Team”, October 2012 http://ww.nhtsa.gov/Data/Traf ic+Records 20

32. NHTSA GO TEAMS (CONT.)  Application Requirements  Describe the issue in sufficient detail  Submitted by state-designated representative via TRIPRS  Approved by SHSO and TRCC  Accepted on rolling basis  First-come, first-served Source: “A New Method for Assessing State Traffic Records”, presentation by Dr. John Siegler, 2011 Traffic Records Forum, Charlotte, NC, August 1, 2011. http://ww.nhtsa.gov/Data/Traf ic+Records 21 State requests technical assistance on a specific TR issue State, working with its Regional Program Manager, prepares an application for assistance NHTSA identifies GO Team members and sends to State

33. U.S. DOT TRCC  Comprised of NHTSA, FHWA, FMCSA, and RITA  Coordinated Support for State Records Systems and Analysis through Member Agency Outreach, Training, Technical Assistance, and Grant Programs  Better Utilize Departmental Resources, Identify Data Collection and Analysis Collaboration Opportunities, and Support The Integration of Traffic Records Data and Standards http://ww.dot.gov/trcc 22

34. CDC – WEB-BASED INJURY STATISTICS QUERY AND REPORTING SYSTEM (WISQARS)  Interactive, On-line Database  Fatal injury data  Non-fatal injury data  Violent death data  Cost of injury data  Data Parameters  Intent of injury  Mechanism/cause  Body region  Nature/type  Geographic location  Demographics http://ww.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html 23