Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKevin Anderson Modified over 9 years ago
2
An experimental setup to investigate intermittency in pipe systems Università degli Studi di Genova Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Meccanica Energia & Aeronautica Relatori: Prof. Alessandro Bottaro Prof. R.I. Sujith Candidato: Diego Zangrillo Luglio 2015
3
Indian Institute of Technology Madras 2 24/07/2015
4
Purpose of the work Investigate Aeroacoustic Intermittency in a very simple experimental setup to understand, predict and avoid it in real systems For example: In compressor stations of gas transport In combustor of aircraft engines In safety valves on boilers 3 24/07/2015
5
Example of events which happened in the past because of Aeroacoustic Instabilities: 4 Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company: safety valves installed on boilers The steam dryer in the boiling water reactor (BWR) of Quad Cities Unit 2 (QC2) 24/07/2015 D. Tonon, A. Hirschberg, J. Golliard and S. Ziada, Aeroacoustics of pipe systems with closed branches, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2010
6
Between chaos and order: Intermittency 24/07/2015 5
7
Experimental Setup 6 Sampling Time= 30 s F s = 10 KHz microphone orifice Settling chamber open end Dimensions: L = 600 mm D = 50 mm d 0 = 10 mm t = 5 mm L c = 300 mm d c = 300 mm 24/07/2015
8
Acquiring System 24/07/2015 7
9
Data Analysis Fast Fourier Transform Hurst exponent Recurrence Plot Recurrence Quantification Analysis 8 24/07/2015
10
In Orifice Case (A) Re = 3097 Ma = 0.014 Case (B) Re = 4588 Ma = 0.021 Case (C) Re = 4818 Ma = 0.022 Case (D) Re = 5047 Ma = 0.023 Case (A) 9 24/07/2015
11
In Orifice Case (A) Re = 3097 Ma = 0.014 Case (B) Re = 4588 Ma = 0.021 Case (C) Re = 4818 Ma = 0.022 Case (D) Re = 5047 Ma = 0.023 Case (B) 10 24/07/2015
12
In Orifice Case (A) Re = 3097 Ma = 0.014 Case (B) Re = 4588 Ma = 0.021 Case (C) Re = 4818 Ma = 0.022 Case (D) Re = 5047 Ma = 0.023 Case (C) 11 24/07/2015
13
In Orifice Case (A) Re = 3097 Ma = 0.014 Case (B) Re = 4588 Ma = 0.021 Case (C) Re = 4818 Ma = 0.022 Case (D) Re = 5047 Ma = 0.023 Case (D) 12 24/07/2015
14
Frequency vs Air Flow Rate vs Amplitude 13 A B C D 24/07/2015
15
Hurst Exponent 14 24/07/2015
16
Hurst Exponent 15 24/07/2015
17
Recurrence Plot 16 24/07/2015 Ref: N. Marwan, M. Carmen Romano, M. Thiel, J. Kurths, Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems, University of Potsdam, 2006
18
17 24/07/2015
19
18 24/07/2015
20
RQA parameters 19 24/07/2015 Ref: C. L. Webber Jr, J. P. Zbilut, Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems
21
20 24/07/2015
22
RQA parameters 21 24/07/2015 Ref: C. L. Webber Jr, J. P. Zbilut, Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems
23
22 24/07/2015
24
RQA parameters 23 24/07/2015 Ref: C. L. Webber Jr, J. P. Zbilut, Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems
25
24 24/07/2015
26
Conclusions and future developments Intermittency found in a simple aeroacoustic system Need to focus on the first transition Detection of the intermittency type 25 24/07/2015
27
Thanks for your attention
28
An experimental setup to investigate intermittency in pipe systems Università degli Studi di Genova Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Meccanica Energia & Aeronautica Relatori: Prof. Alessandro Bottaro Prof. R.I. Sujith Candidato: Diego Zangrillo Luglio 2015
29
RQA parameters 28 31/03/2015
30
29 31/03/2015
31
Multifractal Spectrum: I transition 24/07/2015 30
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.