Download presentation
1
Intraplate Earthquakes
New Madrid, Missouri: December 1811, January 1812, February 1812 Figure 3-17
2
Intraplate Earthquakes
Eastern U.S. earthquakes less frequent, but more widely felt Crust is older and transmits stress Figure 3-20
3
Earthquake Size and Characteristics
How big is it? Answer in terms of perceived effects: intensity Answer in terms of amount of energy released: magnitude
4
Earthquake Intensity Mercalli Intensity Scale developed in 1902
Based on effects Local small quake is similar to distant large quake Table 3.2
5
Felt effects using Mercalli Scale
6
Felt effects using Mercalli Scale
Hypothetical M7.8 earthquake
7
Landers 1992 earthquake: Felt intensity by zip code
8
Earthquake Magnitude Richter Magnitude Scale (ML) derived by Charles Richter in 1935 Uses maximum amplitude of earthquake waves on seismograph Logarithmic scale Richter magnitude less accurate above M6.5 Figure 3-29
9
Problems with scales Moment magnitude is measure of total energy expended during earthquake Determined from long-period waves Moment = (shear strength of rocks) x (surface area of rupture) x (slip distance on fault) Each number is 32X energy Each 2 numbers =1000X This is the most common scale for quakes >3.5
10
Another example of M=1/f
11
1995 Kobe earthquake, Japan
12
1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, SF Bay Area
13
Liquifaction Water in sediment causes solid rock to behave like a liquid.
14
Liquifaction
15
Secondary Ground Effects
Surface rupture-scarp Earthquakes often trigger landslides Can also cause liquefaction Soils become almost liquid when shaken, solidify when shaking stops Significant damage to structures atop liquefied sediments Fires
17
Surface rupture-scarp
18
1906 earthquake surface rupture. 8’ fence offset above
And
20
Australia, 1968, M6.8
21
Armenia, 1988, M6.9
22
Borah Peak, ID: 1983 M7.3
23
California, 1979, M6.9
24
Landslides caused by 2002 Denali Fault earthquake
25
1965 Seattle quake M6.5
26
Liquifaction Water in sediment causes solid rock to behave like a liquid.
27
This residential and commercial building sank more than three feet into the partially liquefied soil.
28
Liquifaction: Niigata, Japan, 1964
29
San Francisco 1906 M8.3 Secondary effects: Fire
30
Long term probability Probability of where and when an earthquake will strike used to construct risk map Figure 4-14
31
Earthquake Hazards 2% chance in next 50 years
32
The San Francisco Bay Area
Figure 4-17
33
Las Cruces: 15-18% chance of M5 in 50 yrs.
34
Sample Test Questions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.