Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCleopatra Melton Modified over 9 years ago
1
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES The work of UNICA in the context of new modes of publication and dissemination Dr Paul Ayris Chair, UNICA Scholarly Communications Group Director of UCL Library Services and UCL Copyright Officer e-mail: p.ayris@ucl.ac.uk
2
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 2 Content UNICA and the Scholarly Communications debate New models of dissemination SHERPA at http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/ RIOJA at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/rioja/http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/rioja/ Conclusions?
3
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 3 Content UNICA and the Scholarly Communications debate New models of dissemination SHERPA RIOJA E-Theses Conclusion
4
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 4 The Mission of UNICA Universities UNICA is a grouping of universities in capital cities in Europe at http://www.ulb.ac.be/unica/. http://www.ulb.ac.be/unica/ Universities are: world-class centres of research and teaching, dedicated to developing and disseminating original knowledge to benefit the world of the future We believe in engaging fully with the world around us in breaking new ground through challenging convention
5
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 5 What do our academics want? Not money, necessarily… As authors Visibility and Impact As readers Access to a fully comprehensive body of research literature Transparent delivery 24 x 7 Anytime, Any place, Anywhere Traditional publishing models have delivered enormous benefits to scholarship through widespread e-delivery They have also raised expectations…
6
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 6 Less than 60% 100% to walk-in users at UCL 0% remotely online UCL’s published research outputs % available digitally to Nottingham researchers? % available to the general public?
7
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 7 90% of its funded research is available online 40% ‘How accessible is NHS-funded research to the general public and to the NHS's own researchers?’ M. Cockerill, 2004 at http://www.biomedcefsntral.com/openaccess/inquiry/refer submission.PDF http://www.biomedcefsntral.com/openaccess/inquiry/refer submission.PDF UK National Health Service % available to an NHS hospital?
8
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 8 UNICA and next steps UNICA’s Scholarly Communications Group has endorsed the EU- funded study on the future of scholarly publishing at http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/scientific-publication- study_en.pdf http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/scientific-publication- study_en.pdf UNICA has signed the EC petition at http://www.ec-petition.eu/ promoting Open Accesshttp://www.ec-petition.eu/ ‘I have signed the petition today with the approval of the Steering Committee of UNICA’: Professor Arthur Mettinger, Vienna, 12/02/07 For UNICA, this is the future which we intend to shape
9
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 9 Content UNICA and the Scholarly Communications debate New models of dissemination SHERPA at http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/ RIOJA Conclusions?
10
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 10 Open Access Berlin Declaration and Budapest Open Access Initiative underpin developments http://oa.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlindeclaration.html http://oa.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlindeclaration.html http://www.soros.org/openaccess/ http://www.soros.org/openaccess/ Open Access means that: The literature that should be freely accessible online is that which scholars give to the world without expectation of payment. Primarily, this category encompasses their peer-reviewed journal articles, but it also includes any unreviewed preprints that they might wish to put online for comment or to alert colleagues to important research findings. (Budapest Open Access Initiative)
11
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 11 Berlin Declaration Open access contributions must satisfy two conditions The author(s) and right holder(s) of such contributions grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship (community standards, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now), as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use. A complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in an appropriate standard electronic format is deposited (and thus published) in at least one online repository using suitable technical standards (such as the Open Archive definitions) that is supported and maintained by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, inter operability, and long-term archiving.
12
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 12
13
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 13
14
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 14
15
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 15
16
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 16
17
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 17
18
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 18
19
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 19
20
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 20 FUNDER mandates – via SHERPA-JULIET Ideal support for Open Access would mandate Open Access dissemination of the final research outputs as a condition of grant without any embargo period JULIET (via SHERPA) assigns an Open Access tick when each condition is met: Whether to archive: Deposit required What to archive: Author’s final version of published PDF version required When to archive: When accepted for publication
21
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 21 Content UNICA and the Scholarly Communications debate New models of dissemination SHERPA RIOJA at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/rioja/http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/rioja/ Conclusions?
22
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 22
23
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 23
24
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 24
25
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 25
26
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 26
27
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 27
28
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 28
29
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 29
30
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 30
31
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 31
32
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 32
33
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 33 Content UNICA and the Scholarly Communications debate New models of dissemination SHERPA RIOJA Conclusions?
34
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 34 Conclusions? European research-led universities have an agenda: to investigate if they can embrace a role as disseminators, aggregators and publishers to look at repositories and open access as tools which can help them achieve these ends to add value to the dissemination process particularly in terms of institutionally-produced content to identify whether their efforts are sustainable in the long-term
35
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES 35 And finally… Photograph of original colour scheme for Flaxman Gallery, UCL If you have been… Thanks for listening Questions and comments…
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.