Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Moderator: Kevin T. Fuji, Pharm.D., M.A. Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice Assistant Director Center for Health Services Research and Patient Safety.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Moderator: Kevin T. Fuji, Pharm.D., M.A. Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice Assistant Director Center for Health Services Research and Patient Safety."— Presentation transcript:

1 Moderator: Kevin T. Fuji, Pharm.D., M.A. Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice Assistant Director Center for Health Services Research and Patient Safety

2 Objectives Understand the peer review process for grant submissions Improve grant writing by understanding how the grant application is viewed from a reviewers’ perspective

3 Panelists Shirley A. Blanchard, Ph.D., ABDA, OTR/L, FAOTA Associate Professor of Occupational Therapy School of Pharmacy and Health Professions Kimberly A. Galt, Pharm.D., Ph.D. Professor of Pharmacy Practice Assistant Vice Provost for Multidisciplinary Health Sciences Research Associate Dean for Research; Schools of Dentistry, Nursing, and Pharmacy and Health Professions Sonia M. Rocha-Sanchez, Ph.D. Associate Professor in Oral Biology and Biomedical Sciences School of Dentistry Patrick C. Swanson, Ph.D. Professor Graduate Program Director Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology School of Medicine

4 What is Scientific/Peer Review? Process by which grant applications are reviewed and scored for scientific merit

5 NIH Mock Study Section NIH Peer Review Revealed http://public.csr.nih.gov/aboutcsr/contactcsr/pages/con tactorvisitcsrpages/nih-grant-review-process-youtube- videos.aspx http://public.csr.nih.gov/aboutcsr/contactcsr/pages/con tactorvisitcsrpages/nih-grant-review-process-youtube- videos.aspx

6 Panel Discussion Provide an overview of your experience as a grant reviewer. How was it similar or different from the NIH mock study section? How does your approach change when you are reviewing grant applications for different funding agencies? What are the 3 most important things you look for when reviewing applications? What is the most common mistake that you see investigators make in their grant application?

7 Q & A Session Shirley A. Blanchard, Ph.D., ABDA, OTR/L, FAOTA National Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Kimberly A. Galt, Pharm.D., Ph.D. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Veterans Affairs (VA) Sonia M. Rocha-Sanchez, Ph.D. National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Science Foundation (NSF) Patrick C. Swanson, Ph.D. American Cancer Society National Institutes of Health (NIH)

8 Resources Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality http://www.ahrq.gov/fund/peerrev/peerproc.htm American Cancer Society http://www.cancer.org/research/applyforaresearchgrant/peerreviewco mmittees/index http://www.cancer.org/research/applyforaresearchgrant/peerreviewco mmittees/index National Institutes of Health http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer_review_process.htm National Science Foundation http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/meritreview/ Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute http://www.pcori.org/get-involved/reviewers/become-scientific- reviewer/ http://www.pcori.org/get-involved/reviewers/become-scientific- reviewer/


Download ppt "Moderator: Kevin T. Fuji, Pharm.D., M.A. Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice Assistant Director Center for Health Services Research and Patient Safety."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google