1. VSC DATA COLLECTION William S. Griswold

2. 2 Presentation Agenda 1 USCG Strategic Plan 2 NASBLA Work Group 3 Project purpose 4 Results to date 5 Q&A

3. STRATEGIC PLAN of the National Recreational Boating Safety Program 2012-2016 Objective 8: Operator Compliance – USCG Required Safety Equipment Increase compliance levels for specific required safety equipment on recreational boats. Strategy 8.1 – Evaluate Incidents of Non-Compliance with specific USCG Required Safety Equipment

4. NASBLA Engineering, Reporting & Analysis Committee (ERAC) Charge C-3: Conduct an analysis of data derived from the United Safe Boating Institute (and affiliated organizations) efforts to capture Vessel Safety Check (VSC) data to determine what meaningful trends can be identified from the initial data collection. [National RBS Plan Performance Goal for reducing casualties; RBS Obj. 8, Operator Compliance-Required Safety Equipment; NASBLA’s strategic goal of conducting research for evaluating RBS program efforts and informing decision makers.] 4

5. 5 Purpose of the VSC Data Collection Project Make better use of data from the VSC Process

6. USBI – United Safe Boating Institute Undertook project, funded by CG grant & Involving two parent organizations: – USCG Auxiliary – United States Power Squadrons (USPS) 6

7. Determine Why Vessels Fail VSCs CG Aux in CY 12 - 119,987 vessel exams 98,408 passed (74.5%) 30,579 FAILED Compare with Accident Data Correlations ? Trends? Regional Differences? Archive for Other Future Uses Incorporate in future data collection systems 7

8. AUXDATA is on life support No funds to change VSC collection Trial run 10 years ago – not possible Why USBI? Represents both CGAux & USPS Has an existing web site for collection 8

9. Gather only important information Only need info from exams that FAILED No personal information, but some other info that’s already captured on form 7012 9

10. Form 7012 Used by both USPS & CGAux 10

11. Auxiliary Examiners Will be asked to complete their VSCs as always For those vessels that fail, the examiner will go to the web page at http://www.usbi.org/vsc.php and enter the reasons the vessel failed 11

12. 12

13. USPS EXAMINER AT WORK 13

14. USPS Vessel Examiners Will be asked to complete their VSCs with the additional data asked for The Squadron VSC Chairs will enter the VSC data on a newly designed USPS input page rather than the existing page This data will be passed to the USBI database to be merged with the Auxiliary data

15. MEASUREMENT To see if this pilot program is capturing significant data, we can compare number of VSC failures ineach state between AUXDATA and the Pilot Program This measurement might help future changes 15

16. ANALYSIS – so far Data collected is up to end of 2012 Hurricane Sandy flooded CGAux host equipment Oct. 29, shutting down web site for 2 months USPS data intact – National input from most states CGAux data incomplete – mainly from 5 test states – MI, MO, NC, TX & WA + 4 – FL, IL, MD, WY TOTAL FAILED EXAMS – 3,592 16

17. Focusing on 5 reasons which could cause an accident, reports show % of total failures: Fire Extinguishers 18% Life Jackets 8% Navigation Lights 8% Visual Distress Signals 6% Sound Device 3% Notes: An examination may result in a failure for more than one reason These differences are statistically significant 17

18. Probability of Failure: Fire Extinguishers30% Life Jackets13% Navigation Lights13% Visual Distress Signals 10% Sound Device 6% 18

19. USPS – 44 States + Washington DC + Puerto Rico 3119 failed VSC’s with 5,398 reasons failed CGAux – 5 pilot states + 4 others 471 failed VSC’s with 778 reasons failed Overall average 1.7 items failed per exam 19

20. Summary table of failures 5 out of a possible 15 failure categories Reason for Failure CGAux Failures CGAux % of Fail. USPS Failures USPS % of Fail. Total Failures % of Total Failures PFD304 %4618 %4914 % VDS17623 %2004 %3766% Fire Ext.739 %1,02719 %1,10018 % Sound557 %1543 %2093 % Nav Lts.15620 %3326 %4888 % TOTAL of All 15 categories 7785,3986,176 20

21. Differences in failure probability by organization 21

22. Possible reasons for differences in failure patterns – Lack of consistency in criteria used by each organization – Differences in boat populations being examined by the two organizations (locations, size of boats, other) 22

23. VISUAL DISTRESS SIGNALS (VDS) CGAux reported 176 VDS failures – 31% were on Inland Waters USPS reported 200 VDS failures – 52% were on Inland Waters Some concern about Federal requirements, State requirements on Inland Waters and Vessel Examiners getting it right 23

24. Other Interesting Facts 55% of USPS “Pollution Placard” failures were on vessels <26 feet – not a Fed. Requirement 75 (2%) of total reported failures (3590) had no failures, VSC was passed Florida had the highest # failures – 12%, Ohio and Michigan had 11% each These three states had 34% of the reported failures, 18% of registered boats, and 21% of reported boating accidents 24

25. Location AreaCGAuxUSPSTOTAL% of TOTAL Coastal1901,2651,45541% Inland2581,7432,00156% River231111344% TOTAL4713,1193,590 25

26. SIZE OF VESSEL LengthCGAuxUSPSTOTAL% OF TOTAL Unknown0660 <16 Feet11441452815 25 Feet2631,4191,68247 39 Feet759711,04629 65 Feet143093239 >65 Feet5050 TOTAL4713,1193,590 26

27. PROBILITY OF FAILURE BY LENGTH Type | Under 25’ | Over 25’ | TOTAL NumberProbabilityNumberProbabilityNumberProbability Other1352.6098959.69802311.6436 Fire Ext606.2733493.35881099.3060 Lights321.1448167.1215488.1359 PFD312.1407146.1063458.1275 VDS263.1186113.0822376.1047 Sound129.058280.0582209.0582 27

28. And in Conclusion This project is a long term wish to use VSC’s as a vehicle to determine why boats fail, where they are and what they don’t have on board Perhaps, we can correlate carriage deficiencies with boating accidents Other data bases have not been able to tell us why; maybe our method will help direct our educational efforts, and public awareness initiatives 28

29. Check Us Out http://www.usbi.org/ We are glad to be partners with NASBLA NSBC NWSC If you have any questions, please contact us wsgriz@aol.com 29

30. 30 Q & A time