1. STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP Low Wood Hotel, Ambleside 13 – 15 January 2009 Professor Paul Wellings Vice-Chancellor

2. SHAPE OF PRESENTATION GLOBAL CONTEXT NATIONAL CONTEXT LANCASTER UNIVERSITY AGENDA INITIATIVES FOR 2009-2014 CHALLENGES

3. GLOBAL CONTEXT Economic changes and perturbations International competition International sites for LU Degrees Relative market growth International League Tables

4. NATIONAL CONTEXT White paper 2009/10? Prospects for sector growth Fees review Skills and employability Volatility in R funds League Tables and Rankings

5. AN AMBITION FOR LANCASTER UNIVERSITY Capitalise on strong teaching, research and financial position to secure our position. By 2015: Number 1 in the North-West Top 10 in England Top 100 in the World

6. COMPOSITE UK LEAGUE TABLE 2008 1)Oxford15921)Glasgow77 2)Cambridge15722)Aston66 3)LSE15023)Manchester64 4)Imperial14924)Birmingham61 5)St. Andrews14225)Sheffield60 Warwick26)Newcastle53 7)UCL13627)RHC49 8)Durham12828)Leeds48 9)York12429)Aberdeen42 10)Loughborough11830)Sussex41 11)Bath112UEA 12)Leicester10632)Cardiff40 13)Exeter10433)Surrey38 14)Lancaster10334)Dundee29 15)Edinburgh10135)Strathclyde28 16)KCL10036)Kent24 Nottingham37)Essex23 18)Bristol91Reading 19)SOAS9039)Queen’s Belfast19 Southampton40)Liverpool18 Based on positions in the Guardian, Independent, Sunday Times and Times League Tables (1 st = 40pts, 40 th = 1pt for each table)

7. EQUITY AND ACCESS - ISSUES 1)How is our widening participation work influencing outcomes on targets? 2)Is our work with schools aligned with government priorities? 3)Will increases to staff turnover rates create opportunities? 4)Have we improved our management of poor performance?

8. LANCASTER UNIVERSITY AGENDA A)Equity and Access B)Sustainable Development C)Quality of Instruction D)Quality of Research E)Engagement of Student Experience F)Use of Technology G)Transparent Management and Administration H)Process Drivers

9. A) EQUITY AND ACCESS Students Widening Participation Targets - Social Class - BME School Interactions Staff Age-related retirement Women in SET Turn-Over Rates

10. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - ISSUES 1)How do we collect and report data on environmental performance? 2)Can we reduce our footprint? 3)What new opportunities are there to improve the estate?

11. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR WOMEN IN THE WORKPLACE Number of Senior Staff by Level or Gender LEVEL2004 - 20052005 - 20062006 - 20072007 - 2008 FM%FFM FM FM Grade 7 208 256 45 214 276 44 218 263 45 202 237 46 Grade 8 131 220 37 148 228 39 168 237 41 167 231 42 Grade 9 52 147 26 57 156 27 65 170 28 68 181 27 Professorial & Equivalent 36 159 18 35 167 17 41 164 20 46 176 21 TOTAL 427 782 35 454 827 35 492 834 37 483 825 37

12. B) SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Environment Energy Building Standards Footprint Capacity International Partnerships Impact of Research

13. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE Water : 2006-07 - 466169L x 10 3 2007-08 -474690L x 10 3 Electricity :2006-07 -127249 G Joules 2007-08 -122630 G Joules Gas :2006-07 -195152 G Joules 2007-08 -248576 G Joules Recycling :2006-07 –7.7% 2007-08 -27.8%

14. C) QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION NSS Assessment and Feedback Curriculum Reform Internationalisation of Curriculum Balance of Undergraduate and Masters provision

15. LEARNING AND TEACHING ISSUES 1.Have we improved our academic programme structures? 2.Have we achieved greater financial efficiency and sustainability in our courses? 3.Has teaching quality influenced student outcomes? 4.Have we optimised the use of IT in learning and teaching? 5.Are we attracting and retaining the highest quality students?

16. COURSE/DEGREE PORTFOLIO We need to do this for both undergraduate and post- graduate taught courses/modules Academic Reputation Builders Improve financial performance Limit number in portfolio Self Sustaining Academic Reputation Builders Grow Loss Makers Delete unless clear strategic purpose Income Generators Improve reputation High Low Academic Output (R & T) Net Financial Return

17. TECHNOLOGY TRENDS IN TEACHING AND LEARNING What are the trends for e-books and e-journals? What proportion of units of study have an associated web-site and tools?

18. D) QUALITY OF RESEARCH REF Pgr Volume External Funding Impact

19. DISTRIBUTION OF 4* RESEARCH OUTPUTS RUSSELL GROUP1994 GROUP 1)LSE35%6)YORK23% 2)CAMBRIDGE32%8)ESSEX22% 3)OXFORD32%8)GOLDSMITHS22% 4)UCL27%12)DURHAM20% 5)IMPERIAL26%12)SOAS20% 6)MANCHESTER23%14)BATH19% 8)EDINBURGH22%14)BIRKBECK19% 11)WARWICK21%14)LANCASTER19% 14)CARDIFF19%14)RHC19% 14)KCL19%14)QMC19% 14)SHEFFIELD19%

20. U of ATop 5Rank Corrected GPA Cambridge50371 Oxford50362 Manchester532112 KCL371723 UCL49164 Imperial221512 Bristol48157 Nottingham471216 Sheffield491114 Warwick29105 LSE1482 QMC29822 Durham30810 Leeds46811 Bath18720 St. Andrews2677 Cardiff34725 Edinburgh3976 Birmingham49720 Essex14618 Reading32617 Southampton33619 Lancaster2259 York25514 Newcastle38524 UNITS OF ASSESSMENT IN TOP 5

21. U of A excellence v Institutional excellence 0.75 0.50 0.25 1.02.03.0 Depth/Diversity Intensity Depth/Diversity : UofA in Top 5 as a proportion of UofA submitted Intensity : Corrected for Institution

22. QR IS LIKELY TO BE DRIVEN BY THE MARKET SHARE OF 4* RESEARCH OUTPUTS 1)Lancaster has 1.53% market share 2)Ranked 20 th by volume 3)Expect this to be moderated by portfolio mix

23. THE SHORT TO MEDIUM TERM APPROACH TO ALLOCATING QR RESOURCES NEEDS TO ACHIEVE THREE THINGS : 1)Pre-adapt Lancaster for the REF - citations - impact - PhD volume 2)Maintain high quality U of A 3)Advance small number of units to increase Depth/Diversity score

24. RESEARCH AND INNOVATION ISSUES 1)Does it matter that our research productivity depends on a small number of star researchers? 2)Should we be increasing the number of HiCi researchers? 3)How do we foster internal emerging talent? 4)How do we manage staff who don’t meet expectations on research output? 5)How do we change the balance of our research in time for the REF?

25. RESEARCH OUTPUTS 1 0 Cumulative number of academic staff Cumulative Research Outputs What proportion of staff produce 80% of outputs? Are there variations between faculties?

26. RESEARCH PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT Mature Research Areas/Performers High Research Areas/Performers Low Research Areas/Performers New Research Areas/Performers CB DA Current Research Outputs Combination of publications, £ and PhD completions ContractingGrowing A: Invest in promising new areas B: Continued investment for growth C: Maintain D: Identify and Exit

27. E)ENGAGEMENT WITH STUDENT EXPERIENCE Value added to all categories of student (ug/pg, home/international, full time/part time) Graduate destinations Role of Colleges and Departments Better Information for Students

28. ENGAGEMENT WITH STUDENT EXPERIENCE - ISSUES 1)How can we optimise the student experience from prospective student to alumni? 2)Have we done enough to improve student administrative services? 3)Have we addressed the social and economic pressures faced by students? 4)Have we balanced the needs and expectations of all types of students? 5)Have we done enough work at the College/Department interface?

29. UNDERSTANDING STUDENT NEEDS SEGMENTSUnderstanding of needs Implementation of requirement Hm/eu u/g Hm/eu pgt pg research International Part-time Poor Excellent Is this view correct? Services could be better integrated? Variation in environment? Inadequate support?

30. F) USE OF TECHNOLOGY Web tools Web academic content Management data

31. USE OF TECHNOLOGY - ISSUES 1)How will new generation web tools contribute to productivity and efficiency? 2)What steps need to be taken to create a consistent website with greater market impact? 3)Are we using new technologies most effectively for internal communications (with staff and students)? 4)What are the impediments to creating and sustaining consistent management data?

32. G)TRANSPARENT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION Governance New Administrative Structure Staff turnover Faculty variations in staff attitude

33. TRANSPARENT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION - ISSUES 1)Do Faculties have the appetite to continue reforming their T & R portfolios without changes to incentive structure? 2)Are we producing clear policies and consistently implementing all of them? 3)What is the scale of productivity and efficiency change flowing out of the Administrative review? 4)Have we established governance structures capable of managing the scale of risks now confronting the sector in the medium term?

34. H) PROCESS DRIVERS Next Generation KPIs Funding and fund raising Funding structures Funding strategy

35. PROCESS DRIVERS - ISSUES 1)Is our finance strategy resilient and capable of maintaining a sustainable position as growth slows? 2)Are we still focussed on new growth opportunities? 3)What changes are needed in funding incentives to deliver on our targets? 4)Are we sufficiently organised to deliver a campaign for our 50 th anniversary? 5)What KPIs are at the core of our revised strategy?

36. DONATIONS 2004-20052005-20062006-20072007-2008 Secured philanthropic donations (includes confirmed pledges) £420,000£1,749,000£2,011,000£3,668,000 Philanthropic cash received £582,000£622,000£1,318,000£1,521,000 University-wide philanthropic income* secured and received Data source: Lancaster University Ross-CASE Survey submission *Philanthropic income defined according to the Ross-CASE survey guidelines. Data sets are not strictly comparable due to changes in defining industry standards. Please refer to Fiona Aiken for further information.

37. INCOME 2003/042004/052005/062006/072007/08 Funding Council Grants3332 3029 Tuition Fees2221202123 Research Grant and Contracts17 15 O O I26283130 Endowment Income22233 112304125230136589148704162640 EXPENDITURE 2003/042004/052005/062006/072007/08 Staff Costs (Recurrent)5958 5758 Staff Costs (Restructuring)00000 Depreciation55655 O O E3233343534 Interest Payable33322 107369122044131173144961156721 LANCASTER UNIVERSITY:INCOME & EXPENDITURE

38. LANCASTER UNIVERSITY : INCOME & EXPENDITURE Over the past five years the budget has: 1)Grown at rates above the sector average and well above the long-term trend for Lancaster 2)Income components have been twice as variable as expenditure components 3)Controls on staff costs will be important if income growth slows in the next period

39. INCOME AND EXPENDITURE 2008/092013/14 Comment Income£'000 Funding Council Grants47,61654,296Low inflation. Proportion declining. Academic Fees43,77463,674Home static, overseas increasing Research Grants and Contracts26,16834,844Growth ca. 6.6% pa Other Operating Income44,14453,534Growth ca. 4.5% pa Endowment Income and Interest Receivable4,1223,371 Total Income165,824209,719 Expenditure Staff Costs (Recurrent)98,330116,554Staff costs within target range Staff Costs (Restructuring)150 Depreciation9,73215,964Based on capital programme Other Operating Expenses48,48564,608Rebalancing from staff costs Interest Payable3,3593,124 Total Expenditure160,056200,400 Revaluation reserve transfer685 Historical Cost Surplus/(Deficit)6,45310,004 Move to 5% surplus 4%5%

40. INITIATIVES FOR 2009 - 2014 1)Step change sustained improvement in Feedback and Assessment 2)Reform of course curriculum 3)Graduate Characteristics and Destinations 4)Deliver transition to REF 5)New collaborations with industry for greater impact 6)Improved data management systems and processes 7)Improved staff attraction and retention 8)Capital Programme delivered 9)Pgr environment and investment transformed 10)50 th Anniversary campaign delivered

41. CHALLENGES & TARGETS 1)Increase HiCi Staff by 50% 2)Deliver the Off-shore International Programme and increase International numbers (50% increase in income) 3)Sustain Financial Strategy and Surplus at 5% 4)Outstanding teaching and learning environment (Top 10 NSS) 5)Pgr volume up by 50%

42. A FINAL QUESTION ARE THESE FIVE TARGETS SUFFICIENT TO DELIVER LANCASTER 1 : 10 : 100 ?