1. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.1 Regaining Control of Revoked DWI Offenders Interlocks As an Alternative To Hard License Revocation Substance Abuse Policy Research Program Annual Grantee Meeting November 29-30, 2006 Paul Marques, PhD and Richard Roth, PhD Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation

2. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg. 2 An Ignition Interlock is an Electronic Monitor with Rejection Authority Dedicated Probation Officer in Front Seat On duty 24 hours per day Tests and Records daily BAC’s Allows only Alcohol-Free Persons to Drive. Reports All Violations to the Court (or DMV in Administrative Programs) Costs Offender only $2.30 per day. (1 less drink per day)

3. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg. 3 Simple Combining of Studies Recidivism While Interlocks Installed Contrast groups for each study set to 100%

4. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg. 4 Simple Combining of Studies Recidivism Same People After Interlocks Removed (Striped Bars)

5. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg. 5 Mathematical Combining of Interlock Studies Relative Risk of Recidivism (with Interlocks Installed) =.36 A Meta-Analysis of Interlock Studies Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism. Source: Willis, Lybrand, & Bellamy, 2005

6. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg. 6 Post interlock results A Meta-Analysis of Interlock Studies Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism. Source: Willis, Lybrand, & Bellamy, 2005

7. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg. 7 BUT – While Interlocks are Very Effective Few studies are at a Jurisdictional Level AND few programs achieve high installation rates –average is under 10%. Florida (and Quebec) have innovative administrative programs that each achieved 26% installation rates. In Hancock County Indiana a Judge who required interlocks of all offenders achieved 62% installation –the highest until Santa Fe County (Dick will explain) THE NATIONAL SAFETY CHALLENGE is to Increase Penetration

8. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg. 8 Growth in Interlocks USA – trend is only linear from 1986-2006 First program 1986 in California National penetration less than 10% 1.4 million DUI arrests per yr (FBI) MADD intends big push to increase to 500,000 in 5 years (by 2011). NOTE: Sweden will require on all cars by 2012 1998 Freund estimate 2002 Rauch estimate 2006 Roth estimate

9. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg. 9 MADD’s projection Unless we can inflect the growth curve it will be another 60-80 years before we approach interlocks for all DUI. MADD wants to do a national program of ramping up the installation rate to 500-700,000 in 5 yrs. The MADD goal

10. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg. 10 New York Times Editorial November 25, 2006 Sensing You're Too Drunk to Drive.. “The initial (MADD) goal, which is backed by associations of State highway officials and car manufacturers, is to have all states do what New Mexico has already done: require that all convicted drunken drivers, even first-time offenders, have devices installed in their cars that measure alcohol in the breath and immobilized the car if levels exceed set limits.”

11. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.11 Interlocks are Effective, Cost-Effective and Fair Interlocks reduce DWI re-arrests by 40-90% They reduce the economic impact of drunk driving by $3 to $7 for every $1 of cost. Interlocks are perceived as a fair sanction by 85% of over 4000 offenders surveyed...But they only work if… you get them installed.

12. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.12 The Problems 1.35% of DWI offenders were revoked but not convicted. 2.25% of DWI offenders were 1 st non-aggravated. 3.Subsequent offenders had mandatory hard revocation. 4.Judges were reluctant to mandate interlocks for those whose licenses were revoked. 5.75% of revoked offenders continue to drive. 6.Few revoked offenders ever get re-licensed. In 2003, New Mexico had a law mandating interlocks for all High BAC and Subsequent DWI offenders, but few interlocks were being installed.

13. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.13 NM Ignition Interlock License Act Purpose 1.To increase the utilization of interlocks by those arrested for drunk driving, 2.To eliminate the reluctance of judges to mandate interlocks for those who cannot get a license to drive, 3.To reduce drunk driving, and 4.To reduce the number of revoked offenders who never reinstate licenses.

14. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.14 In New Mexico an Ignition Interlock License… is available to anyone revoked for DWI, requires an approved interlock and insurance, and allows driving anywhere, anytime in an insured, interlocked vehicle.

15. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.15 So our first research question is.. Has the Ignition Interlock License Act Increased the Utilization of Interlocks by DWI Offenders?

16. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.16 2732 / year Optional for 2 nd and 3 rd conviction Mandatory for aggravated and subsequent convictions Interlock Licensing Act An alternative to revocation

17. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.17 How does New Mexico compare with other states in interlock utilization?

18. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.18 2 nd Question How many interlock licenses have been granted and is the rate changing?

19. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.19

20. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.20 Is there a Reduction in Recidivism? Court Mandated Offenders --ie those who install within 90 days after conviction Other Revoked Offenders --“Voluntary” installations SF County Overall before and after mandatory interlocks and Licensing Act New Mexico Overall before and after

21. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.21 Court Mandated vs Voluntary Installations

22. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.22 Comparison Groups Interlocked Groups Effectiveness with Court Mandated Offenders

23. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.23 Comparison Groups Interlocked Groups Effectiveness with Volunteers ie. Not court-mandated

24. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.24 8.0% Before 6.7% After A 16% Reduction Statewide recidivism decreased.

25. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.25 8.7% Before 6.2% After A 29% Reduction Before After

26. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.26

27. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.27 Fewer Alcohol Involved Fatal Crashes and Fatalities

28. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.28 Self Selection In Choosing Interlocks Among DWI Offenders Revoked 10 yrs For 3 Convictions in 10 years. Comparison Group Matched on Age, Priors, Time between Priors, and Sex. Those who do not install interlocks Are much more likely to be arrested than those who do install.

29. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.29 Group: 3 or More Convictions in 10 years HR = 0.67 P = 0.13 Using MCPHRA with Covariates: Age Conv Date Time B. Conv Gender Priors

30. Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.30 Survey of Interlocked Offenders 77%81% 69% 63% N = 796