Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAndra Henry Modified over 9 years ago
1
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 1 DESIGN STUDY OF MEDICAL CYCLOTRON SCENT300 Mario Maggiore on behalf of R&D Accelerator team Laboratori Nazionali del Sud Catania, Italy
2
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 2 SYNCHROTRONS are today used everywhere (japan, GSI, CNAO) for carbon beam therapy CYCLOTRONS IBA C235 RESISTIVE COILS ACCEL\VARIAN K250 SC PROTONS SC CYCLOTRON IBA C400 INFN SCENT300 PROTONS CARBON IONS CYCLOTRONS PROVIDING LIGHT IONS compactness and simplicity lower size and cost superconducting tech. high beam modulation control fixed energy (ESS needed)
3
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 3
4
4 MAIN PARAMETERS
5
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 5 INJECTION LAYOUT E inj =25 AKeV V inflect = 14 KV gap inflect = 6 mm E inflect = 23KV/cm Vdee inj=70 kV Bo=3,15 tesla ECR sources
6
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 6 CENTRAL REGION DESIGN Beam centering Vertical focusing during first turns Energy gain 250 AKeV/turn YCYC XCXC
7
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 7 MAGNETIC FIELD PROPERTIES
8
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 8 UNTIL THE PHASE VARIES WITHIN 20 DEG, THE MAGNETIC FIELD HAS TO MATCH THE ISOCHRONOUS ONE WITH A PRECISION OF ±5GAUSS (|ΔB/B | <10 -4 ) ISOCHRONIZATION LEVEL
9
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 9 RF CAVITY DESIGN 50 kW power losses estimated f RF = 98 MHz, 4 th harmonic E max = 15 MV/m
10
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 10 BEAM DYNAMIC STUDY structural resonance coupling resonance
11
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 11 WHAT APPENDS AT RESONANCE ZONE? Solution? Jump these radii… but energy gain cannot increase too much Minimal transverse stability plot
12
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 12 Radial beam envelop in two cases old magnetic design energy cm Qr
13
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 13 AUTOELLIPSE TRANSPORT 900 1040 910 920 930 940 950 960 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 1030 PR R Number of turns Ar=0.2 Ar=0.1
14
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 14 VERTICAL BEAM DYNAMIC Vertical beam envelop Axial space phase
15
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 15 Trimming C12 to H2+: RF and MF change Bo=cost. Best solution: coils split into two parts (C400) RF Frequency scales 0,7 % Two beams mean two different operating RF frequencies small variation of the MF gauss
16
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 16 2nd way: change only the magnetic field f RF = cost Magnetic field difference between C12 and H2+ is larger, but RF freq. is kept constant (it needs only the fine tuning) gauss
17
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 17 Trimming by two correction coils
18
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 18 GOOD M. FIELD MATCHING MINIMIZING POWER LOSSES Less than 4 KW/COIL MAIN COIL CC 1 CC VALLEY
19
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 19 PHASE SLIP CALCULATED BY EO MAGNETIC FIELD MATCHING MAIN COIL : 4586 A/cm 2 4586+53.7 A/cm 2 CC 1:104.47 A/cm 2 8X8 cm 2, R int =171 cm, H min =81 cm >> 1.32 kW/coil CC VAL: 395.1 A/cm 2 5X4 cm 2, R int =106 cm, H min =69 cm >> 3.24 KW/coil RF SETTING: nu0=24.18717 MHz 24.18587 MHz Δf: 1,3 KHz TRIMMER RANGE TUNING (~ 6 KHz) MAIN SETTING TO CHANGE BEAM 12 C 6+ H2+H2+ extraction
20
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 20 EXTRACTION LAYOUT V ED1,2 = 50kV E max = 120kV/cm 4 PASSIVE MCs ε ~ 60 % protons Carbon ions R EXT =122 cm 260 AMeV 1 single turn 4 PASSIVE MCs ε ~ 100 %
21
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 21 BEAM DYNAMIC AT EXTRACTION
22
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 22 CURRENT BEAM ESTIMATION Protons by stripper Carbon ions by EDs Transmission efficiency Ion source2 mA Injection line 90 % Central region 5 % (no buncher) acceleration90% extraction 60% C 100% p P current80 nA C current48 nA
23
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 23 CONCLUSION The final design of SCENT300 was completed and no other study is expected: the technical drawings of the iron steel are also accomplished out.
24
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 24 GRAZIE !
25
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 25 Coils parameters Coil Parameters Size150x210 mm 2 Current density 46.5 amp/mm 2 Inner Radius1420 mm Distance from the M.P. 70 mm Energy Stored35 MJ Nominal Current (I) 900÷1000 amp Total current (NI)1.48 Mamp Max Magnetic field4.4 tesla Axial Force-9.09 MN Average Hoop Stress (peak) 100 (110) MPa Conservative Design
26
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 11 12 Vertical force (N) TOT=-891 tons/coil Radial force (N) Average=166 tons/coil FORCES EVALUATION ON THE COILS (J X B)
27
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 27 TENSILE STRESS STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN THE COILS HOOP STRESS RADIAL STRESS
28
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 28
29
HIAT 2009, 9 th June, Venice 29 Summary
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.