Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMagnus Burns Modified over 9 years ago
1
COMPARISONS 64-bit Intel Xeon X5650 2.66Ghz processors –12 processors sharing 48 GB RAM –Each BARON run restricted to single processor All experiments under GAMS –500 CPU seconds limit; optca=optcr=1e-6 –Performance profiles with GAMS performance tool Global codes –BARON v. 12.6 (2013) –Antigone 1.1, Couenne 0.4, LindoGlobal 8.0, SCIP 3.0 1
2
369 NLPs FROM GLOBALLIB 2 Con: 785 (1—26759), Var: 10922 (2—19315) BARON SCIP COUENNE LINDOGLOBAL ANTIGONE
3
315 MILPs FROM GAMS PERFORMANCE LIB 3 BARON SCIP COIN-BC LINDOGLOBAL XPRESS CPLEX Con: 2251 (2—344158), Var: 3520 (3—348195), Disc: 1712 (0—87482)
4
250 MINLPs FROM MINLPLIB 4 BARON SCIP COUENNE LINDOGLOBAL Con: 532 (1—24972), Var: 603 (1—23827), Disc: 258 (1—10920) ANTIGONE
5
250 relaxed-MINLPs FROM MINLPLIB 5 Con: 532 (1—24972), Var: 603 (1—23827) BARON SCIP COUENNE LINDOGLOBAL ANTIGONE
6
980 NLPs FROM PRINCETONLIB 6 BARON SCIP COUENNE LINDOGLOBAL Con: 823 (1—13801), Var: 1336 (2—20201) ANTIGONE
7
AGGREGATE: 1599 NLPs and MINLPs (369 GLOBALLIB, 250 MINLPLIB, 980 PRINCETONLIB) BARON SCIP COUENNE LINDOGLOBAL 7 Con: 766 (1—26759), Var: 1159 (1—23827), Disc: 40 (0—10920) ANTIGONE
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.