Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Ron Cherry, Maged Fam and Emiliano López

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Ron Cherry, Maged Fam and Emiliano López"— Presentation transcript:

1 Ron Cherry, Maged Fam and Emiliano López
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Logging, development and evolution as a fundamental evaluation tool in the reservoir management Ron Cherry, Maged Fam and Emiliano López

2 Geological & Reservoir
Overview Formation Evaluation Problems High uncertainty in reservoir evaluation using conventional Log Analysis, due to: Multilayer reservoirs made up of an average of 20 stacked layers, about 5 mt. each. Low formation water salinity Several water/oil and gas/light oil contacts randomly distributed throughout a rock column of mts. (average 1500 to 2500 mts.) Complex lithology (shaly and tuffaceous sand reservoirs) Different hydrocarbon types

3 Core Porosity vs Permeability
Permeability (md) Core measurements on samples from about 60 wells, 800 samples from San Jorge Basin Porosity (%) Permeability (md)

4 Grain Density Vs Core Porosity
Matrix Density Distribution in so called “Sandstone” from San Jorge Basin Grain Density Vs Core Porosity Core Porosity (%) Grain Density (G/c3)

5 MRI Core Porosity vs. Core Porosity
San Jorge Basin MRI Core Porosity (%) Core Porosity (%) Core Porosity Vs MRI Core Porosity

6 Geometric Mean T2 Cutoff vs. Depth
Geometric Mean T2 Cutoff (ms) Depth (m) Geometric Mean T2 Cutoff Vs. Depth The high degree of variation in the T2 cutoff range may cause some inconsistencies in the final Interpretation. Thus the SBVI method is a better technique for determining BVI.

7 Spectral Bulk Volume Irreductible
SBVI SBVI Coef. 0.0XXX

8 Core Permeability and MRI Permeability Models
Vs Depth Core Permeability and MRI Permeability Models (md) Depth (m) Core Permeability and MRI Permeability Models Vs Depth N.B.: MRI Permeability data is based on SVBI model

9 Core Permeability Vs MRI Permeability Models
MRI Permeability Models (md) Core Permeability (md) MRI Permeability Models Vs Core Permeability N.B.: MRI Permeability data is based on SVBI model

10 Reservoir Properties &
MRIL Life Cycle Met reservoir Objectives Specify Objectives Reservoir Properties & Problems Borehole Conditions Size, mud, temp….etc Test Results Yes MRIL Pre-job Planning Compare No Data Processing & Interpretation Prognosis Selection of Zones to Test STIMRIL Activation Logging speed Field Log QC Resistivity log Core Analysis if available

11 Acquisition Parameters
MRI Forward Model water oil gas Tool Physics Acquisition Parameters G, TE, TW water oil gas MRIL Forward Modeling Planner Expected Fm. Fluid Properties Temp., Pressure & Viscosity water oil Mud Properties Borehole Size

12 Petrophysical Solution!!! MRI Specific Acquisition and
Interpretation Techniques “one logging pass” EDM Enhanced Diffusion Method (Hydrocarbons 2-50 cp) TDA Time Domain Analysis (Hydrocarbons < 2 cp)

13 But….!!!

14 1800 L/H 75 % SW 2400 L/H 100 % SW MRI Prognosis: Heavy OIL
ShortTE LongTE MRI Prognosis: Heavy OIL 1800 L/H 75 % SW MRI Prognosis: Water 2400 L/H 100 % SW

15 Special Design for Heavy OIL detection… MRIL Ultra Long TE Activation
How can we distinguish Heavy OIL from Water ??? Special Design for Heavy OIL detection… MRIL Ultra Long TE Activation

16 1800 L/H 75 % SW 2400 L/H 100 % SW MRI Prognosis: Heavy OIL
ShortTE LongTE UltraLongTE MRI Prognosis: Heavy OIL 1800 L/H 75 % SW MRI Prognosis: Water 2400 L/H 100 % SW

17 Heavy OIL Detection Example
ShortTE LongTE UltraLongTE Initial Test Result (8hs Swabbing): 2400 L/H – 100% SW Final Test Result (24hs Swabbing): 2400 L/H – 88% SW

18 Halliburton Question regarding details on test results
Dear Customer: “…If We understand well, the formation was producing water for 8 hours before starting to produce Oil …?? You have insisted to keep it producing because there was a very good signal on the MRI Ultra-Long Te activation,….. Is that correct …??...” Customer’s response “It's correct...It has been a very good news today, because up to yesterday, we couldn't believe that from that signal it would be only water... We insisted and it was 2400 l/h x 88% of water (may be the amount of water would have declined if we would wait more time... but for us it was enough seeing some oil)…”

19 Fluid Typing: Light OIL
MRI Prognosis Light Oil w/ HGOR Composite Log MRI Interpretation EDM + TDA Shot-Te/Long-Tw TDA Long-Te/Long-TW Dif. S.-Te/L.TW-S.Tw EDM Flow 920 L/H 40 % SW PVH1083

20 Fluid Typing: GAS Flow x 12mm Wet GAS P/D 280psi P/E 1560 psi PVH990
MRI Prognosis Light OIL MRI Prognosis GAS Flow x 12mm Wet GAS P/D 280psi P/E 1560 psi PVH990 MRI Prognosis GAS

21 Halliburton’s Reservoir Fluids Prognosis Sheet
Based on MRIL Interpretation

22 Conclusions Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Logs as a fundamental evaluation tool in the reservoir Management Determination of Porosity, Independent to Matrix Determination of Bulk Volume Irreducible Water Reliable Permeability Indicator (absolute after Calibration) Identify Fluid Type (Gas, Oil & Water) by zone Identification of Rock Quality…Permeability, Porosity & Clay Determine variations of Hydrocarbon types (Resistivity independent)… …Heavy, Intermediate, Light Oil or Gas Halliburton Energy Services – Provides products, services, and integrated solutions for oil and gas exploration, development and production. Includes Sperry-Sun, Baroid Drilling Fluids, Security DBS, Dresser Oil Tools, Mono Pumps, and Westport Technology from Dresser and Drilling Systems, Logging & Perforating, Zonal Isolation, Tools, Testing & Tubing Conveyed Perforation, Production Enhancement, Completion Products & Services, Integrated Solutions, Integrated Technology Products and NUMAR from Halliburton.


Download ppt "Ron Cherry, Maged Fam and Emiliano López"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google