Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ARE SOME DISABILITIES MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS? CONCEPTUALISING FLUCTUATING OR RECURRING IMPAIRMENTS.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ARE SOME DISABILITIES MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS? CONCEPTUALISING FLUCTUATING OR RECURRING IMPAIRMENTS."— Presentation transcript:

1 ARE SOME DISABILITIES MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS? CONCEPTUALISING FLUCTUATING OR RECURRING IMPAIRMENTS

2 Overview  Understanding disability  ‘Not disabled enough?’ or ‘Having a disability ‘sometimes’’  The great terminology debate  The role of discourse  Student views

3 Understanding disability  Medical vs social: Until 1980s policy, provision and discourse dominated by aetiological approach.  Work of Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS 1976) highly influential. Applied concept of interpretation to disability studies.  Oliver (1990, 1996) most associated with establishing social model in the public domain.  Social model acknowledges role of society in imposing limitations on individual.  In both cases, disability generally conceptualised as unchanging.

4 ‘Not disabled enough?’ or ‘Having a disability ‘sometimes’’  Many impairments have tendency to vary in intensity over time e.g. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME), epilepsy or diabetes.  Though many of these impairments now formally recognised, diagnosis (e.g. ME) can be difficult, and lack of acceptance can exist.  Bury (1988, 1991, 1997, 2000) has written extensively of the impact of ‘chronic illnesses’ and ‘biographical disruption’.  Having a disability ‘sometimes’ (Peters 1993).  Growing awareness: provision, legislation and research.  Episodic Disabilities Framework (O’Brien et al 2008, 2009).  Episodic Disabilities Employment Network (EDEN) and Episodic Disabilities Network (EDN).  Canadian Working Group on HIV and Rehabilitation (CWGHR).  McKee 2007; Lightman et al 2009; Vick and Lightman 2010; Vickers 2001.

5

6

7 The great terminology debate  Terminology key challenge in promoting awareness and understanding.  Just another label?  Multiple possible terms: long term, progressive, fluctuating, recurring or past.  Equality Act 2010 makes some attempt to add definitions:  motor neurone disease, muscular dystrophy, dementia - progressive;  rheumatoid arthritis, myalgic encephalitis (ME)/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), depression, epilepsy as fluctuating or recurring  an impairment which has lasted or is likely to last at least 12 months constitutes a long term condition.  ‘there are special rules covering recurring or fluctuating conditions’ (UK Government 2010).

8 The great terminology debate  General Medical Council (2010) acknowledge the term fluctuating conditions.  Department of Health (2007) uses terms progressive and fluctuating conditions.  Work Life website - chronic fluctuating conditions. Co-developed by the Department of Work and Pensions, Multiple Sclerosis Society, and organizations. Info on aspects of the law, benefits and disabled peoples’ rights.  Of notable importance in Higher Education also: London School of Economics acknowledges potential impact of long term medical conditions, London South Bank University suggests students consider potential for fluctuations when disclosing and negotiating reasonable adjustments.

9 The role of discourse  Foucault – knowledge and meaning produced through (often competing) discourse or organisation of assumptions (1980).  Importance of the lived experience in understanding mental illness (influenced by existential phenomenology) (1961).  Technologies of the self – tools to produce own ethical understanding, incorporating ‘bodies and souls, thoughts, conduct, and way of being’ (p. 18, 1988).  Elements of language/ discourse, power, autonomy, identity creation/ evolution.

10 Student views Terminology Episodic Inconsistent Fluctuating Unpredictable Variable Changeable Unpredictable On/ off, up/ down, come and go Unseen Capricious Seasonal -Support for and criticisms of episodic and inconsistent (too regular (like TV), possible negative connotations). -Interesting binary perspective for some students (e.g. on/ off) whilst others described a continuum. -Students discussed usefulness of having a shared term in fostering increased legitimacy, but also difficulties in finding one that would be appropriate for all impairments, and all experiences of one individual. - Also noted how quickly concepts can become out dated/ superseded by new terminology, with potential to cause more confusion.

11 References Bury, M. 1988. Meanings at risk: the experience of arthritis. In Living with chronic illness: the experience of patients and their families, ed. R. Anderson and M. Bury, 89-116. London: Urwin Hyman. Bury, M. 1991. The sociology of chronic illness: a review of research and prospects. Sociology of Health and Illness, 13 (4): 451-468. Bury, M. 1997. Health and illness in a changing society. London: Routledge. Bury, M. 2000. On chronic illness and disability. In Handbook of medical sociology, ed. C. E. Bird, P. Conrad and A. M. Fremont, 173- 183. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Department of Health. 2007. Section 11 – Key problem areas and solutions. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/Browsable/DH_4906949 http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/Browsable/DH_4906949 Foucault, M. 1961. Madness and Civilization, London: Tavistock. Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-197. London: Harvester. Foucault, M. 1988. Technologies of the self. In L H Martin, H Gutman and P H Hutton (eds) Technologies of the self. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, pp.16 - 49 General Medical Council. 2010. Gateways guidance: 4.3 Mental illness and fluctuating conditions. http://www.gmc- uk.org/education/undergraduate/4_3_mental_illness_and_fluctuating_conditions.asp http://www.gmc- uk.org/education/undergraduate/4_3_mental_illness_and_fluctuating_conditions.asp Lightman, E., A.Vick, D. Herd and A. Mitchell. 2009. ‘Not disabled enough’: Episodic disabilities and the Ontario Disability Support Programme. Disability Studies Quarterly, 29 (3): http://www.dsq-sds.org/article/view/932/1108 http://www.dsq-sds.org/article/view/932/1108 London School of Economics. 2010. Services for students with long-term medical conditions. http://www2.lse.ac.uk/intranet/LSEServices/divisionsAndDepartments/disabilityService/guidesToServicesForStudentsWithDisabilities/ servicesForStudentsWithLong-term.aspx http://www2.lse.ac.uk/intranet/LSEServices/divisionsAndDepartments/disabilityService/guidesToServicesForStudentsWithDisabilities/ servicesForStudentsWithLong-term.aspx London South Bank University. 2010. Welcome to Disability and Dyslexia Support (DDS). http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/clsd/disabilities/http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/clsd/disabilities/

12 References McKee, E. 2007. Re-examining the role of episodic disabilities in the workplace. Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance Voices 2007. http://www.arthritispatient.ca/index.php/resources/re-examining-the-role-of-episodic-disabilities-in-the-workplace/ http://www.arthritispatient.ca/index.php/resources/re-examining-the-role-of-episodic-disabilities-in-the-workplace/ O’Brien, K. K., A. M. Bayoumi, C. Strike, N. L. Young and A. M. Davis. 2008. Exploring disability from the perspective of people living with HIV/AIDS: development of a conceptual framework. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6: 76 O’Brien, K. K., A. M. Davis, C. Strike, N. L. Young and A. M. Bayoumi. 2009. Putting episodic disability into context: A qualitative study exploring factors that influence disability experienced by adults living with HIV/AIDS. Journal of International AIDS Society. 12: 30 Oliver, M. 1983. Social Work with Disabled People Oliver, M.1990. The Politics of Disablement.Basingstoke: Macmillans. Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Peters, S.L. 1993. Having a Disability 'Sometimes'. Canadian Woman Studies, 13 (4): 26 – 27 UK Government. Disability and the Equality Act 2010. http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/DisabledPeople/RightsAndObligations/DisabilityRights/DG_4001068 http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/DisabledPeople/RightsAndObligations/DisabilityRights/DG_4001068 UPIAS. 1976. Fundamental Principles of Disability. London: Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. Vick, A. and E. Lightman. 2010. Barriers to Employment Among Women With Complex Episodic Disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21 (2): 70 – 80. Vickers, M. H. 2001. Work and unseen chronic illness: Silent voices. London: Routledge Worklife. 2009. http://www.yourworkhealth.com/http://www.yourworkhealth.com/


Download ppt "ARE SOME DISABILITIES MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS? CONCEPTUALISING FLUCTUATING OR RECURRING IMPAIRMENTS."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google