1. Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Chapter 26
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life

2. Overview: Investigating the Tree of Life
Legless lizards have evolved independently in several different groups
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

3. Figure 26.1
Figure 26.1 What is this organism?

4. Phylogeny is the evolutionary history of a species or group of related species
The discipline of systematics classifies organisms and determines their evolutionary relationships
Systematists use fossil, molecular, and genetic data to infer evolutionary relationships
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

5. Figure 26.2
Figure 26.2 An unexpected family tree.

6. Figure 26.2a
Figure 26.2 An unexpected family tree.

7. Figure 26.2b
Figure 26.2 An unexpected family tree.

8. Figure 26.2c
Figure 26.2 An unexpected family tree.

9. Concept 26.1: Phylogenies show evolutionary relationships
Taxonomy is the ordered division and naming of organisms
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

10. Binomial Nomenclature
In the 18th century, Carolus Linnaeus published a system of taxonomy based on resemblances
Two key features of his system remain useful today: two-part names for species and hierarchical classification
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

11. The two-part scientific name of a species is called a binomial
The first part of the name is the genus
The second part, called the specific epithet, is unique for each species within the genus
The first letter of the genus is capitalized, and the entire species name is italicized
Both parts together name the species (not the specific epithet alone)
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

12. Hierarchical Classification
Linnaeus introduced a system for grouping species in increasingly broad categories
The taxonomic groups from broad to narrow are domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species
A taxonomic unit at any level of hierarchy is called a taxon
The broader taxa are not comparable between lineages
For example, an order of snails has less genetic diversity than an order of mammals
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

13. Species: Panthera pardus Genus: Panthera Family: Felidae Order:
Figure 26.3
Species:
Panthera pardus
Genus:
Panthera
Family:
Felidae
Order:
Carnivora
Class:
Mammalia
Figure 26.3 Linnaean classification.
Phylum:
Chordata
Kingdom:
Animalia
Domain:
Bacteria
Domain:
Archaea
Domain:
Eukarya

14. Linking Classification and Phylogeny
Systematists depict evolutionary relationships in branching phylogenetic trees
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

15. Order Family Genus Species Panthera pardus (leopard) Felidae Panthera
Figure 26.4
Order
Family
Genus
Species
Panthera
pardus
(leopard)
Felidae
Panthera
Taxidea
taxus
(American
badger)
Taxidea
Carnivora
Mustelidae
Lutra lutra
(European
otter)
Lutra
Figure 26.4 The connection between classification and phylogeny.
Canis
latrans
(coyote)
Canidae
Canis
Canis
lupus
(gray wolf)

16. Linnaean classification and phylogeny can differ from each other
Systematists have proposed the PhyloCode, which recognizes only groups that include a common ancestor and all its descendants
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

17. Each branch point represents the divergence of two species
A phylogenetic tree represents a hypothesis about evolutionary relationships
Each branch point represents the divergence of two species
Sister taxa are groups that share an immediate common ancestor
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

18. A polytomy is a branch from which more than two groups emerge
A rooted tree includes a branch to represent the last common ancestor of all taxa in the tree
A basal taxon diverges early in the history of a group and originates near the common ancestor of the group
A polytomy is a branch from which more than two groups emerge
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

19. where lineages diverge Taxon A
Figure 26.5
Branch point:
where lineages diverge
Taxon A
Taxon B
Sister
taxa
Taxon C
Taxon D
Taxon E
ANCESTRAL
LINEAGE
Taxon F
Figure 26.5 How to read a phylogenetic tree.
Basal
taxon
Taxon G
This branch point
represents the
common ancestor of
taxa A–G.
This branch point forms a
polytomy: an unresolved
pattern of divergence.

20. What We Can and Cannot Learn from Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogenetic trees show patterns of descent, not phenotypic similarity
Phylogenetic trees do not indicate when species evolved or how much change occurred in a lineage
It should not be assumed that a taxon evolved from the taxon next to it
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

21. Applying Phylogenies
Phylogeny provides important information about similar characteristics in closely related species
A phylogeny was used to identify the species of whale from which “whale meat” originated
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

22. Minke (Southern Hemisphere)
Figure 26.6
RESULTS
Minke (Southern Hemisphere)
Unknowns #1a, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Minke (North Atlantic)
Unknown #9
Humpback (North Atlantic)
Humpback (North Pacific)
Unknown #1b
Gray
Figure 26.6 Inquiry: What is the species identity of food being sold as whale meat?
Blue
Unknowns #10, 11, 12
Unknown #13
Fin (Mediterranean)
Fin (Iceland)

23. Concept 26.2: Phylogenies are inferred from morphological and molecular data
To infer phylogenies, systematists gather information about morphologies, genes, and biochemistry of living organisms
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

24. Morphological and Molecular Homologies
Phenotypic and genetic similarities due to shared ancestry are called homologies
Organisms with similar morphologies or DNA sequences are likely to be more closely related than organisms with different structures or sequences
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

25. Sorting Homology from Analogy
When constructing a phylogeny, systematists need to distinguish whether a similarity is the result of homology or analogy
Homology is similarity due to shared ancestry
Analogy is similarity due to convergent evolution
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

26. Convergent evolution occurs when similar environmental pressures and natural selection produce similar (analogous) adaptations in organisms from different evolutionary lineages
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

27. Figure 26.7
Figure 26.7 Convergent evolution of analogous burrowing characteristics.

28. Bat and bird wings are homologous as forelimbs, but analogous as functional wings
Analogous structures or molecular sequences that evolved independently are also called homoplasies
Homology can be distinguished from analogy by comparing fossil evidence and the degree of complexity
The more complex two similar structures are, the more likely it is that they are homologous
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

29. Evaluating Molecular Homologies
Systematists use computer programs and mathematical tools when analyzing comparable DNA segments from different organisms
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

30. Figure 1 1 2
Figure 26.8 Aligning segments of DNA.

31. 1 1 2 Deletion 2 1 2 Insertion Figure 26.8-2
Figure 26.8 Aligning segments of DNA.

32. 1 1 2 Deletion 2 1 2 Insertion 3 1 2 Figure 26.8-3
Figure 26.8 Aligning segments of DNA. 2

33. 1 1 2 Deletion 2 1 2 Insertion 3 1 2 4 1 2 Figure 26.8-4
Figure 26.8 Aligning segments of DNA. 2 4 1 2

34. It is also important to distinguish homology from analogy in molecular similarities
Mathematical tools help to identify molecular homoplasies, or coincidences
Molecular systematics uses DNA and other molecular data to determine evolutionary relationships
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

35. Figure 26.9
Figure 26.9 A molecular homoplasy.

36. Concept 26.3: Shared characters are used to construct phylogenetic trees
Once homologous characters have been identified, they can be used to infer a phylogeny
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

37. Cladistics Cladistics groups organisms by common descent
A clade is a group of species that includes an ancestral species and all its descendants
Clades can be nested in larger clades, but not all groupings of organisms qualify as clades
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

38. A valid clade is monophyletic, signifying that it consists of the ancestor species and all its descendants
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

39. (a) Monophyletic group (clade) (b) Paraphyletic group
Figure 26.10
(a) Monophyletic group (clade)
(b) Paraphyletic group
(c) Polyphyletic group A A A B
Group  B B
Group  C C C D D D E E
Group  E
Figure Monophyletic, paraphyletic, and polyphyletic groups. F F F G G G

40. (a) Monophyletic group (clade)
Figure 26.10a
(a) Monophyletic group (clade) A B
Group  C D
Figure Monophyletic, paraphyletic, and polyphyletic groups. E F G

41. A paraphyletic grouping consists of an ancestral species and some, but not all, of the descendants
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

42. (b) Paraphyletic group
Figure 26.10b
(b) Paraphyletic group A B C D
Figure Monophyletic, paraphyletic, and polyphyletic groups. E
Group  F G

43. A polyphyletic grouping consists of various species with different ancestors
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

44. (c) Polyphyletic group
Figure 26.10c
(c) Polyphyletic group A B
Group  C D
Figure Monophyletic, paraphyletic, and polyphyletic groups. E F G

45. Shared Ancestral and Shared Derived Characters
In comparison with its ancestor, an organism has both shared and different characteristics
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

46. A shared ancestral character is a character that originated in an ancestor of the taxon
A shared derived character is an evolutionary novelty unique to a particular clade
A character can be both ancestral and derived, depending on the context
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

47. Inferring Phylogenies Using Derived Characters
When inferring evolutionary relationships, it is useful to know in which clade a shared derived character first appeared
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

48. Figure 26.11
TAXA
Lancelet
(outgroup)
(outgroup)
Lancelet
Lamprey
Lamprey
Leopard
Bass
Frog
Turtle
Vertebral
column
(backbone) 1 1 1 1 1
Bass
Vertebral
column
Hinged jaws 1 1 1 1
Frog
Hinged jaws
Four walking
legs
CHARACTERS 1 1 1
Turtle
Four walking legs
Amnion 1 1
Figure Constructing a phylogenetic tree.
Amnion
Hair 1
Leopard
Hair
(a) Character table
(b) Phylogenetic tree

49. TAXA (outgroup) Lancelet Lamprey Leopard Bass Frog Turtle Vertebral
Figure 26.11a
TAXA
(outgroup)
Lancelet
Lamprey
Leopard
Bass
Frog
Turtle
Vertebral
column
(backbone) 1 1 1 1 1
Hinged jaws 1 1 1 1
Four walking
legs
CHARACTERS 1 1 1
Figure Constructing a phylogenetic tree.
Amnion 1 1
Hair 1
(a) Character table

50. Lancelet (outgroup) Lamprey Bass Vertebral column Frog Hinged jaws
Figure 26.11b
Lancelet
(outgroup)
Lamprey
Bass
Vertebral
column
Frog
Hinged jaws
Turtle
Figure Constructing a phylogenetic tree.
Four walking legs
Amnion
Leopard
Hair
(b) Phylogenetic tree

51. The outgroup is a group that has diverged before the ingroup
An outgroup is a species or group of species that is closely related to the ingroup, the various species being studied
The outgroup is a group that has diverged before the ingroup
Systematists compare each ingroup species with the outgroup to differentiate between shared derived and shared ancestral characteristics
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

52. Characters shared by the outgroup and ingroup are ancestral characters that predate the divergence of both groups from a common ancestor
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

53. Phylogenetic Trees with Proportional Branch Lengths
In some trees, the length of a branch can reflect the number of genetic changes that have taken place in a particular DNA sequence in that lineage
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

54. Drosophila Lancelet Zebrafish Frog Chicken Human Mouse Figure 26.12
Figure Branch lengths can represent genetic change.
Human
Mouse

55. In other trees, branch length can represent chronological time, and branching points can be determined from the fossil record
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

56. Drosophila Lancelet Zebrafish Frog Chicken Human Mouse 542 251 65.5
Figure 26.13
Drosophila
Lancelet
Zebrafish
Frog
Chicken
Human
Figure Branch lengths can indicate time.
Mouse
PALEOZOIC
MESOZOIC
CENOZOIC
542
251
65.5
Present
Millions of years ago

57. Maximum Parsimony and Maximum Likelihood
Systematists can never be sure of finding the best tree in a large data set
They narrow possibilities by applying the principles of maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

58. Maximum parsimony assumes that the tree that requires the fewest evolutionary events (appearances of shared derived characters) is the most likely
The principle of maximum likelihood states that, given certain rules about how DNA changes over time, a tree can be found that reflects the most likely sequence of evolutionary events
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

59. (a) Percentage differences between sequences
Figure 26.14
Human
Mushroom
Tulip
Human
30%
40%
Mushroom
40%
Tulip
(a) Percentage differences between sequences
15% 5% 5%
Figure Trees with different likelihoods.
15%
15%
10%
20%
25%
Tree 1: More likely
Tree 2: Less likely
(b) Comparison of possible trees

60. (a) Percentage differences between sequences
Figure 26.14a
Human
Mushroom
Tulip
Human
30%
40%
Mushroom
40%
Tulip
Figure Trees with different likelihoods.
(a) Percentage differences between sequences

61. (b) Comparison of possible trees
Figure 26.14b
15% 5% 5%
15%
15%
10%
Figure Trees with different likelihoods.
20%
25%
Tree 1: More likely
Tree 2: Less likely
(b) Comparison of possible trees

62. Computer programs are used to search for trees that are parsimonious and likely
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

63. Figure 26.15
TECHNIQUE
Species 
Species 
Species  1
Three phylogenetic hypotheses:  
 
 
   2
Site 1 2 3 4
Species  C T A T
Species  C T T C
Species  A G A C
Ancestral sequence A G T T 3
1/C
1/C  
 
 
1/C
  
Figure Research Method: Applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics
1/C
1/C 4
3/A
2/T
3/A
2/T 
3/A 
4/C
 
 
4/C
4/C
2/T
  
3/A
4/C
2/T
4/C
2/T
3/A
RESULTS  
 
 
  
6 events
7 events
7 events

64. Species  Species  Species           TECHNIQUE
Figure 26.15a
TECHNIQUE
Species 
Species 
Species  1
Figure Research Method: Applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics
Three phylogenetic hypotheses:  
 
 
  

65. TECHNIQUE Site 1 2 3 4 Species  C T A T Species  C T T C
Figure 26.15b
TECHNIQUE
Site 2 1 2 3 4
Species  C T A T
Species  C T T C
Species  A G A C
Figure Research Method: Applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics
Ancestral sequence A G T T

66. 3 4 TECHNIQUE RESULTS 6 events 7 events 7 events 1/C    1/C 
Figure 26.15c
TECHNIQUE 3
1/C  

1/C 
 
1/C
  
1/C
1/C 4
3/A
2/T
3/A  

2/T
3/A
4/C 
 
4/C
4/C
2/T
  
Figure Research Method: Applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics
3/A
4/C
2/T
4/C
2/T
3/A
RESULTS  
 
 
  
6 events
7 events
7 events

67. Phylogenetic Trees as Hypotheses
The best hypotheses for phylogenetic trees fit the most data: morphological, molecular, and fossil
Phylogenetic bracketing allows us to predict features of an ancestor from features of its descendants
For example, phylogenetic bracketing allows us to infer characteristics of dinosaurs
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

68. Lizards and snakes Crocodilians Ornithischian dinosaurs Common
Figure 26.16
Lizards
and snakes
Crocodilians
Ornithischian
dinosaurs
Common
ancestor of
crocodilians,
dinosaurs,
and birds
Saurischian
dinosaurs
Figure A phylogenetic tree of birds and their close relatives.
Birds

69. The fossil record supports nest building and brooding in dinosaurs
Birds and crocodiles share several features: four-chambered hearts, song, nest building, and brooding
These characteristics likely evolved in a common ancestor and were shared by all of its descendants, including dinosaurs
The fossil record supports nest building and brooding in dinosaurs
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

70. Animation: The Geologic Record Right-click slide / select “Play”
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

71. (b) Artist’s reconstruction of the dinosaur’s
Figure 26.17
Front limb
Hind limb
Figure Fossil support for a phylogenetic prediction: Dinosaurs built nests and brooded their eggs.
Eggs
(a) Fossil remains of
Oviraptor and eggs
(b) Artist’s reconstruction of the dinosaur’s
posture based on the fossil findings

72. Front limb Hind limb Eggs (a) Fossil remains of Oviraptor and eggs
Figure 26.17a
Front limb
Hind limb
Figure Fossil support for a phylogenetic prediction: Dinosaurs built nests and brooded their eggs.
Eggs
(a) Fossil remains of
Oviraptor and eggs

73. (b) Artist’s reconstruction of the dinosaur’s
Figure 26.17b
Figure Fossil support for a phylogenetic prediction: Dinosaurs built nests and brooded their eggs.
(b) Artist’s reconstruction of the dinosaur’s
posture based on the fossil findings

74. Concept 26.4: An organism’s evolutionary history is documented in its genome
Comparing nucleic acids or other molecules to infer relatedness is a valuable approach for tracing organisms’ evolutionary history
DNA that codes for rRNA changes relatively slowly and is useful for investigating branching points hundreds of millions of years ago
mtDNA evolves rapidly and can be used to explore recent evolutionary events
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

75. Gene Duplications and Gene Families
Gene duplication increases the number of genes in the genome, providing more opportunities for evolutionary changes
Repeated gene duplications result in gene families
Like homologous genes, duplicated genes can be traced to a common ancestor
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

76. They can diverge only after speciation occurs
Orthologous genes are found in a single copy in the genome and are homologous between species
They can diverge only after speciation occurs
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

77. Speciation with divergence of gene
Figure 26.18
Formation of orthologous genes:
a product of speciation
Formation of paralogous genes:
within a species
Ancestral gene
Ancestral gene
Ancestral species
Species C
Speciation with
divergence of gene
Gene duplication and divergence
Figure Two types of homologous genes.
Orthologous genes
Paralogous genes
Species A
Species B
Species C after many generations

78. Speciation with divergence of gene
Figure 26.18a
Formation of orthologous genes:
a product of speciation
Ancestral gene
Ancestral species
Speciation with
divergence of gene
Figure Two types of homologous genes.
Orthologous genes
Species A
Species B

79. Paralogous genes result from gene duplication, so are found in more than one copy in the genome
They can diverge within the clade that carries them and often evolve new functions
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

80. Formation of paralogous genes: within a species
Figure 26.18b
Formation of paralogous genes:
within a species
Ancestral gene
Species C
Gene duplication and divergence
Figure Two types of homologous genes.
Paralogous genes
Species C after many generations

81. Genome Evolution
Orthologous genes are widespread and extend across many widely varied species
For example, humans and mice diverged about 65 million years ago, and 99% of our genes are orthologous
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

82. Gene number and the complexity of an organism are not strongly linked
For example, humans have only four times as many genes as yeast, a single-celled eukaryote
Genes in complex organisms appear to be very versatile, and each gene can perform many functions
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

83. Concept 26.5: Molecular clocks help track evolutionary time
To extend molecular phylogenies beyond the fossil record, we must make an assumption about how change occurs over time
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

84. Molecular Clocks
A molecular clock uses constant rates of evolution in some genes to estimate the absolute time of evolutionary change
In orthologous genes, nucleotide substitutions are proportional to the time since they last shared a common ancestor
In paralogous genes, nucleotide substitutions are proportional to the time since the genes became duplicated
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

85. Individual genes vary in how clocklike they are
Molecular clocks are calibrated against branches whose dates are known from the fossil record
Individual genes vary in how clocklike they are
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

86. Divergence time (millions of years)
Figure 26.19 90 60
Number of mutations 30
Figure A molecular clock for mammals. 30 60 90
120
Divergence time (millions of years)

87. Neutral Theory
Neutral theory states that much evolutionary change in genes and proteins has no effect on fitness and is not influenced by natural selection
It states that the rate of molecular change in these genes and proteins should be regular like a clock
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

88. Problems with Molecular Clocks
The molecular clock does not run as smoothly as neutral theory predicts
Irregularities result from natural selection in which some DNA changes are favored over others
Estimates of evolutionary divergences older than the fossil record have a high degree of uncertainty
The use of multiple genes may improve estimates
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

89. Applying a Molecular Clock: The Origin of HIV
Phylogenetic analysis shows that HIV is descended from viruses that infect chimpanzees and other primates
HIV spread to humans more than once
Comparison of HIV samples shows that the virus evolved in a very clocklike way
Application of a molecular clock to one strain of HIV suggests that that strain spread to humans during the 1930s
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

90. Index of base changes between HIV gene sequences
Figure 26.20
0.20
0.15
HIV
Index of base changes between HIV gene sequences
0.10
Range
Adjusted best-fit line
(accounts for uncertain
dates of HIV sequences)
Figure Dating the origin of HIV-1 M with a molecular clock.
0.05
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
Year

91. Concept 26.6: New information continues to revise our understanding of the tree of life
Recently, we have gained insight into the very deepest branches of the tree of life through molecular systematics
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

92. From Two Kingdoms to Three Domains
Early taxonomists classified all species as either plants or animals
Later, five kingdoms were recognized: Monera (prokaryotes), Protista, Plantae, Fungi, and Animalia
More recently, the three-domain system has been adopted: Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya
The three-domain system is supported by data from many sequenced Classification Schemes genomes
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

93. Animation: Classification Schemes Right-click slide / select “Play”
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

94. Eukarya Bacteria Archaea Figure 26.21
Land plants
Dinoflagellates
Green algae
Forams
Ciliates
Diatoms
Red algae
Amoebas
Cellular slime molds
Euglena
Trypanosomes
Animals
Leishmania
Fungi
Sulfolobus
Green
nonsulfur bacteria
Thermophiles
(Mitochondrion)
Figure The three domains of life.
Spirochetes
Halophiles
Chlamydia
COMMON
ANCESTOR
OF ALL
LIFE
Green
sulfur bacteria
Bacteria
Methanobacterium
Cyanobacteria
Archaea
(Plastids, including
chloroplasts)

95. COMMON ANCESTOR OF ALL LIFE
Figure 26.21a
Green
nonsulfur bacteria
(Mitochondrion)
Spirochetes
Chlamydia
COMMON
ANCESTOR
OF ALL
LIFE
Green
sulfur bacteria
Figure The three domains of life.
Bacteria
Cyanobacteria
(Plastids, including
chloroplasts)

96. Sulfolobus Thermophiles Halophiles Methanobacterium Archaea
Figure 26.21b
Sulfolobus
Thermophiles
Halophiles
Figure The three domains of life.
Methanobacterium
Archaea

97. Eukarya Land plants Dinoflagellates Green algae Forams Ciliates
Figure 26.21c
Eukarya
Land plants
Dinoflagellates
Green algae
Forams
Ciliates
Diatoms
Red algae
Amoebas
Cellular slime molds
Euglena
Trypanosomes
Figure The three domains of life.
Animals
Leishmania
Fungi

98. A Simple Tree of All Life
The tree of life suggests that eukaryotes and archaea are more closely related to each other than to bacteria
The tree of life is based largely on rRNA genes, as these have evolved slowly
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

99. Horizontal gene transfer complicates efforts to build a tree of life
There have been substantial interchanges of genes between organisms in different domains
Horizontal gene transfer is the movement of genes from one genome to another
Horizontal gene transfer occurs by exchange of transposable elements and plasmids, viral infection, and fusion of organisms
Horizontal gene transfer complicates efforts to build a tree of life
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

100. Bacteria Eukarya Archaea 4 3 2 1 Billions of years ago Figure 26.22
Figure The role of horizontal gene transfer in the history of life. 4 3 2 1
Billions of years ago

101. Is the Tree of Life Really a Ring?
Some researchers suggest that eukaryotes arose as a fusion between a bacterium and archaean
If so, early evolutionary relationships might be better depicted by a ring of life instead of a tree of life
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.

102. Figure 26.23
Archaea
Eukarya
Figure A ring of life.
Bacteria

103. A B D B D C C C B D A A (a) (b) (c) Figure 26.UN01
Figure 26.UN01 Concept Check 26.1, question 3
(a)
(b)
(c)

104. Branch point Taxon A Most recent common ancestor Taxon B Sister taxa
Figure 26.UN02
Branch point
Taxon A
Most recent
common
ancestor
Taxon B
Sister taxa
Taxon C
Taxon D
Taxon E
Figure 26.UN02 Summary figure, Concept 26.1
Polytomy
Taxon F
Taxon G
Basal taxon

105. Monophyletic group Polyphyletic group A A A B B B C C C D D D E E E F
Figure 26.UN03
Monophyletic group
Polyphyletic group A A A B B B C C C D D D E E E
Figure 26.UN03 Summary figure, Concept 26.3 F F F G G G
Paraphyletic group

106. Salamander Lizard Goat Human Figure 26.UN04
Figure 26.UN04 Test Your Understanding, question 5
Human

107. Figure 26.UN05
Figure 26.UN05 Test Your Understanding, question 9

108. Figure 26.UN06
Figure 26.UN06 Appendix A: answer to Figure 26.5 legend question

109. Figure 26.UN07
Figure 26.UN07 Appendix A: answer to Figure legend question

110. Figure 26.UN08
Figure 26.UN08 Appendix A: answer to Concept Check 26.1, question 4

111. Figure 26.UN09
Figure 26.UN09 Appendix A: answer to Concept Check 26.3, question 3

112. Figure 26.UN10
Figure 26.UN10 Appendix A: answer to Concept Check 26.6, question 3

113. Figure 26.UN11
Figure 26.UN11 Appendix A: answer to Test Your Understanding, question 9