Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHeather McCarthy Modified over 9 years ago
1
Integrated Transport System for Children with CP Progress Presentation Group 14 David Dwight, Gayathri Srinivasan, Joseph Tejan
2
Project Need Cerebral Palsy (CP): a group of permanent, non-progressive, movement problems Transport modalities formed Mobility means access Education, social activities, sports teams Estimated 500,000 children with CP 77% with spastic CP (CDC)
3
Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (Eckung E, Hagberg G, et al)
4
Project Scope Design an integrated system that is easily transported and intuitive and fully functional Purpose A) Develop a theoretical model B) Identify adjustable/customizable parts C) Create physical prototype of key elements Goals Due to time and funding constraints a fully realized physical model will not be produced Exclusions
5
Design Requirements Cost and Construction < $1500 system Lightweight but durable Portability and Weight Compact; fit in average trunk Loadable into car, train, etc. Functionality Intuitive to convert Equally functional to each system Safety Prevent tipping Longevity of product
6
Design Alternatives: Overview The designs loosely fall into two main categories Branches for further investigation of alternatives First, System Packaging Create ability for various items to be attached or stored into neat system Second, System Conversion Items are combined together and convertable
7
Design Alternatives, cont. Features: Telescoping cane / wheelchair handles Walker storage on back of wheelchair Features: Telescoping cane / wheelchair handles Walker storage underneath wheelchair Features: Uses folding chair design Front assembly of walker attachable Bag on wheelchair for storage
8
Design Alternatives, cont. Features: Spring-loaded seat concept Naturally in the upright position Primarily walker Features: Added seat concept Detachable, foldable seat Primarily walker Features: 3 sets of wheels concept Native position as wheelchair Rotating set of wheels for walker
9
Safety F = 58.8 N Max t =.88 Nm F = 19.6 N Max t = 1.58 Nm F = 14.7 N Max t = 2.35 Nm
10
Analysis: Materials Examined frame material, tubing shape, nylon vs. vinyl, wheel material, wheel functionality
11
Analysis: Designs Walker Stored Underneath design scores highest on weighted Pugh Chart
12
Walker Stored Underneath Wheelchair Advantages Better safety and stability Functionality is optimal since in combines individual systems Comfort of person is high due to full wheelchair design Easily fulfills weight bearing guidelines No need for collapsing mechanics on wheelchair Disadvantages Cost Weight
14
Thank You
15
Sources auditorium seating: http://www.ki.com/uploadedfiles/Docs/literature- samples/techdocs/Tech-Spec_Concerto- Auditorium-Seating.pdf http://www.ki.com/uploadedfiles/Docs/literature- samples/techdocs/Tech-Spec_Concerto- Auditorium-Seating.pdf average weight of 12 year old child: http://www.disabled- world.com/artman/publish/height-weight- teens.shtml http://www.disabled- world.com/artman/publish/height-weight- teens.shtml Walker image http://www.1800wheelchair.ca/product/4513/nim bo-walker-medium-child-posterior-walker Image of circle and square for round vs. square http://blog.velocite-bikes.com/frame- design/#sthash.upRq40rQ.dpbs Metals Depot aluminum tubing prices http://www.metalsdepot.com/catalog_cart_view.php ?msghttp://www.metalsdepot.com/catalog_cart_view.php ?msg= Physical Characteristics of various metals http://asm.matweb.com/search/SpecificMaterial.asp ?bassnum=MQ304A Prevalence and Incidence of Cerebral Palsy http://cerebralpalsy.org/about-cerebral- palsy/prevalence-and-incidence/ CDC Fact Sheet http://www.cdc.gov/features/cerebralpalsy/ Prevalence of cerebral palsy… and motor funcitoning http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24117446
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.