1. Solar Heat Collector Charbel Saghira Alejandro Forero Victor Berrueta Faculty Advisor: Dr. Andres Tremante Florida International University Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering

2. Problem Statement High Demand for green energy Solution of energy sources in developing countries Power generation is the single largest source of U.S. global warming emissions

3. Motivation Help lower carbon footprint of humanity Governments investment like incentives and tax breaks for renewable clean energy reduce the country’s dependence on foreign oil.

4. Objectives Design and Manufacture a compact solar heat collector Cost efficient way to harvest thermal energy To significantly raise the temperature of water

5. Industry Standards Local Florida Solar Energy Center (FSEC) Standard 102-10 (January 2010) ISO 9806:2013, Solar energy — Solar thermal collectors — Test methods by International Organization for Standardization (February 2013)

6. Florida FSEC Low service hot water (SHW) and swimming pool solar collector. Hydraulic pressure (<25 psig) will be applied and monitored for 10 minutes Prevent Condensate buildup. Use desiccants (not sealed)

7. ISO 9806 Standard Section 9 - High-temperature resistance test using solar simulator Acrylic recommended max serv. Temp. 180 F Section 14 - Rain Penetration. 300kpa spray pressure Tested with water hose Section 16 - Mechanical load test with positive or negative pressure. 2400 Pa (positive and negative), 5400 Pa (positive)

8. Timeline 2014 Timeline TopicMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember Project Formulation Literature Survey Project Constrains Proposed Design Design and Analysis CAD Model Part List Cost Analysis Prototype Construction Prototype Test Final Report Final Presentation

9. Responsibilities Team member Tasks and responsibilities breakdown Alejandro Forero Research and design of system Solidworks Modeling of Solar collector System assembly and testing Charbel Saghira Cost analysis of system components Testing and manufacturing of prototype Material analysis for system components Victor Berrueta Solar Collector research and Modeling System assembly and testing Structural analysis

10. Environmental Impact Reduce humanity’s footprint All materials used are recyclable plastics or metals powered solely by sun light Zero emissions and pollutants

11. Background Information http://sites.gsu.edu/geog1112/files/2014/06MiamiTopSurface_small-243hc8p.png

12. Seasonal Variation of the Sun Solar angle of inclination Solar Azimuth angle http://www.asse-plumbing.org/chapters/NOH%20SolarWtrHtg%20Pres.pdf

13. Seasonal Variation of the Sun http://www.homepower.com/articles/solar-electricity/design-installation/optimizing-pv-array-orientation-tilt

14. Theoretical Analysis Q required = Mass Flow C p ( Tout – T in ) E in – E loss = E out Q conduction = -k copper A c ( ∆T / L) Q convection = h A s ( T s – T ∞ ) Q rad = σ As ( T S 4 – T sky 4 ) E incident = I a A o

15. Theoretical Analysis Best Scenario - 3.84 Liter/min Irradiation1141W/m^2 Energy Transfer to the Tube52.03Watts Temperature Average in27.78°C Temperature Out27.97°C Reynolds Number 15016.56N/A Nusselt Number 102.15N/A Heat transfer coefficient9861.40W/m^2. °C Temperature Out Final28.09°C Temperature Difference0.31°C Best Scenario - 1.92 Liter/min Irradiation1141W/m^2 Energy Transfer to the Tube52.03Watts Temperature Average in27.78°C Temperature Out28.17°C Reynolds Number7508.28N/A Nusselt Number58.67N/A Heat transfer coefficient5663.88W/m^2. °C Temperature Out Final28.36°C Temperature Difference0.58°C

16. Theoretical Analysis Worst Scenario - 1.92 Liter/min Irradiation795W/m^2 Energy Transfer to the Tube36.25Watts Temperature Average in27.78°C Temperature Out28.05°C Reynolds Number 7508.3N/A Nusselt Number 58.67N/A Heat transfer coefficient5663.88W/m^2. °C Temperature Out Final28.19°C Temperature Difference0.41°C Worst Scenario - 3.84 Liter/min Irradiation795W/m^2 Energy Transfer to the Tube36.25Watts Temperature Average in27.78°C Temperature Out27.92°C Reynolds Number15016.6N/A Nusselt Number102.15N/A Heat transfer coefficient9861.40W/m^2. °C Temperature Out Final28.00°C Temperature Difference0.22°C

17. New Approach of Solar Collector Innovative design of solar collector Large surface area exposed to sun vs. low placement area No need for inclination angle Requires only solar energy

18. Why the shape? No need for solar tracking device Future improvement utilizing the focal point Surface area exposed to sun no matter seasonal variation

19. Prototype Construction Solidworks Modeling of solar collector

20. Prototype Construction Construction of Base Insulation to reduce heat dissipation

21. Prototype Construction Construction of 12 Equal sections

22. Prototype Construction Installation of copper tubing

23. Prototype Construction Painting of solar collector

24. Prototype Construction Solar collector

25. Prototype Video

26. Experimental procedure Experiment # 1 Temp. of exposed surface Vs Temp. of shaded surface Record maximum temperature of solar collector Part A. Test solar collector not painted Part B. Test solar collector painted black Test solar collector with and without cover

27. Experiment #1 Data Exposed surface temp. vs. Shaded surface temp.

28. Experiment #1 Data Exposed surface temp. vs. Shaded surface temp.

29. Discussion of Results Results from experiment #1 Results Experiment #1 Part A Surface TemperatureExposedShaded Δ temperature Actual Max temperature with Cover149°F136°F13°F Max temperature w/out Cover118°F95°F23°F Results Experiment #1 Part B Surface TemperatureExposedShaded Δ temperature Actual Max temperature with Cover180°F158°F22°F

30. Experimental procedure Experiment # 2 Water temperature Vs. Mass flow rate Record maximum water temperature running at 1.92 Liter/min and 3.82 Liter/min.

31. Experiment #2 Data Experiment # 2 Water Temperature @ (1.92 Liter/min)

32. Experiment #2 Data Experiment # 2 Water Temperature @ (3.84 Liter/min)

33. Discussion of Results Results from experiment #2 Difference from theoretical results Results Experiment #2 Water Temperature 1.92 L/min 3.84 L/min Max water temperature 112°F 101°F Temperature of water 87°F 90°F Δ temperature 25°F 11°F Difference Actual Vs. Theoretical Experiment #2 Water Temperature 1.92 L/min 3.84 L/min Δ temperature Theoretical 1.44°F 0.66°F Δ temperature Actual 25°F 11°F

34. Cost Analysis Total project cost = Total project cost = $ 3,3393 Materials = $ 401.61 Labor = $ 2,892 Tools = $ 97.58

35. Life-Long Learning Design Collaboration Brainstorming Acquisition and Allocation of Resources Budgeting Learn manufacturing methods or skills before construction

36. Conclusion Continuous Design Effort Significant results achieved with compact design Free usable energy Worldwide application design

37. Recommendations Optimum flow rate needs to be determined Copper tubing wrapping alternatives Improve methods of data collection by using more apparatuses

38. Questions