Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMichael Chambers Modified over 9 years ago
1
QUALITY ASSUARANCE AND ACCREDITATION DLR 2.5 DEFINITION M&E for DLR 2.5 SUGGESTED NEXT STEPS
2
DLR#2.5: International evaluation and accreditation of quality of education programs DLR#2.5: 800,000 Amounts: 600,000 per program internationally accredited; 100,000 per program nationally or regionally accrediated; 100,000 per program per gap-assessment certfied or undertaken by an international quality assurance agency; 100,000 per program for self-evaluation a satisfactory international standard; 100,000 per program description meeting international standard (specific definition to be shared)
3
DEFINITION No. of international regional and nationally accredited education programs This indicator focuses on measuring the → Training Quality of the program. Notes: - Data should give the accumulated number: internationally accredited including regional and sub-regional accreditation, and indicate the specifics (no per each level, also naming the accrediting institution). -Internationally accreditation by a recognized accrediting body – (prior lists submitted to World Bank). -Nationally accredited by agency in charge of accreditation in country
4
No. of international regional and nationally accredited education programs ACE to set up a database of all its programmes (as listed in the IP/proposal submitted to AAU) with details on: title, level (PhD, Masters, Bachelor's, Diploma, etc.), type of accreditation, date of accreditation, expiry of accreditation and accrediting agency/ institution. Information must be provided on the type of accreditation International accreditation undertaken; Gap assessment certified /undertaken by an external accreditation agency; Self-evaluation undertaken following a satisfactory international standards (agreed as part of the performance agreement); Regional (WAHO/CAMES), sub-regional or National Accreditation or ISO; Bologna Compliant programs (details to be specified) Certificates of accreditation
6
PROPOSED NEXT STEPS Initiate self evaluation Initiate gap assessments Initiate steps towards international accreditation Provide proposed list of agencies to international accreditation agencies to WB
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.