Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byIrene Boone Modified over 9 years ago
1
(De)Regulation Of Business Chapter 12
2
Antitrust vs. Regulation Under ideal conditions, the market mechanism provides optimal outcomes: All producers must be perfect competitors. People must have full information about tastes, costs, and prices. All costs and benefits must be reflected in market prices. Pervasive economies of scale must be absent.
3
Antitrust vs. Regulation These ideal conditions are rarely, if ever, attained, leading to market failure. –Market failure - An imperfection in the market mechanism that prevents optimal outcomes.
4
Behavioral Focus Antitrust laws give two options for government intervention: The structure of an industry. The behavior of an industry.
5
Behavioral Focus Antitrust is government intervention to alter market structure or prevent abuse of market power. Regulation is government intervention to alter the behavior of firms, for example, in pricing, output, or advertising.
6
Natural Monopoly A natural monopoly is desirable because it can achieve economies of scale. However, it is likely that consumers will not benefit from the resulting cost savings. Natural monopoly – An industry in which one firm can achieve economies of scale over the entire range of market supply.
7
Declining ATC The distinctive characteristic of a natural monopoly is its downward- sloping average total cost (ATC) curve. The marginal cost (MC) curve lies below the ATC curve at all rates of output.
8
Declining ATC The economies of scale offered by a natural monopoly imply that no other market structure can supply the good as cheaply. –Economies of scale - Reductions in minimum average costs that come about through increases in the size (scale) of plant and equipment.
9
Unregulated Behavior The unregulated pricing of a natural monopolist violates the competitive principle of marginal cost pricing. Marginal cost pricing – The offer (supply) of goods at prices equal to their marginal cost.
10
Unregulated Behavior Because P > MC, consumers are not getting accurate information about the opportunity cost of products sold in monopoly markets. –Opportunity cost – The most desired goods or services that are forgone in order to obtain something else.
11
Unregulated Behavior The natural monopolist’s profit- maximizing output also fails to minimize average total cost.
12
Unregulated Behavior The economic profits potentially earned by monopolist may violate our visions of equity. –Economic profit – The difference between total revenues and total economic costs.
13
Price (dollars per unit) Quantity (units per period) Natural Monopoly Average total cost Demand Marginal cost MC A qAqA qCqC qDqD 0 MR C B A pBpB pCpC pApA Unregulated p ATC = p MC = p
14
Regulatory Options There are a number of regulatory options to deal with natural monopoly: Price regulation. Profit regulation. Output regulation.
15
Price Regulation The government could regulate the monopolist’s price.
16
Price Efficiency The government could force the monopolist to set its price equal to marginal cost. But, in a natural monopoly, MC is always less than ATC.
17
Subsidy Marginal cost pricing by a natural monopolist implies a loss on every unit of output produced. A subsidy must be provided to the natural monopoly in order to provide efficient pricing,.
18
Production Efficiency In a natural monopoly, production efficiency is achieved at capacity production, where ATC is at a minimum. No regulated price can induce the monopolist to achieve minimum ATC. A subsidy would be required to offset market losses.
19
Price (dollars per unit) Quantity (units per period) Price Regulation Average total cost Demand B* Marginal cost MC A qAqA qCqC qBqB qDqD 0 MR C B A pBpB pCpC pDpD pApA Unregulated p ATC = p MC = p
20
Profit Regulation The government can regulate the natural monopoly so that it makes a normal profit. The government would set the price where P = ATC.
21
Bloated Costs If a firm is permitted a specific profit rate (or rate of return), it has no incentive to limit costs. Profit regulation creates incentives for a regulated firm to inflate (“pad”) its costs.
22
Output Regulation The government can regulate the natural monopoly’s output. Regulation of the quantity produced may induce a decline in quality.
23
Price (dollars per unit) 0 Quantity (units per period) Minimum Service Regulation Average total cost Demand D Marginal cost pApA pDpD pCpC pBpB qAqA qDqD qCqC qBqB MR Unregulated p, q
24
Imperfect Answers A realistic goal is to choose a strategy that balances competing objectives. The choice isn’t between imperfect markets and flawless government intervention. The choice is between imperfect markets and imperfect intervention.
25
Imperfect Answers In some cases, government failure may be worse than market failure. –Government failure – Government intervention that fails to improve economic outcomes.
26
The Costs of Regulation There are costs associated with regulation: Administrative costs. Compliance costs. Efficiency costs.
27
Administrative Costs Someone must sit down and assess these regulation tradeoffs. The costs of these lawyers, accountants, and engineers represent a real cost to society.
28
Compliance Costs There is a cost for regulated firms to educate themselves, change their production behavior and to file reports with the regulatory authorities.
29
Efficiency Costs Inefficient regulation (bad decisions, incomplete information, and faulty implementation) has a cost associated with it.
30
Balancing Benefits and Costs Regulatory intervention must balance the anticipated improvements in market outcomes against the economic cost of regulation.
31
Deregulation in Practice The push to deregulate is prompted by two concerns: The inefficiencies that regulation imposes. Advancing technology destroyed the basis for natural monopoly.
32
Railroads The Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) was created in 1887 to limit monopolistic exploitation of the railroad situation while assuring a “fair” profit to railroad owners.
33
Railroads With the advent of buses, trucks, subways, airplanes and pipelines as alternative modes of transportation, railroad regulation became increasingly obsolete.
34
Railroads The Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 and the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, granted railroads much greater freedom to adapt their prices and service to market demands.
35
Railroads Railroad companies used that flexibility to increase their share of total freight traffic. The railroads prospered by reconfiguring routes and services, cutting operating costs, and offering lower rates.
36
Railroads Between 1986 and 1993, the average cost of moving freight by rail dropped by 69 percent.
37
Railroads After a series of mergers and acquisitions the top four railroads moved nearly 90 percent of all rail freight in 1998-99. Some firms held monopoly positions on specific routes and charged 20-30 percent more than in non-monopoly routes..
38
Railroad Traffic: Before and After Deregulation 0 600 500 400 300 200 100 1970757677747372717879808182 Deregulation
39
Telephone Service With high fixed costs and very low marginal costs, the telephone had long been an example of natural monopoly. Technology outpaced regulation and greatly reduced the cost for new firms to provide long-distance service.
40
Long Distance Telephone Service In 1982, the courts put an end to AT&T’s monopoly. Since then, over 800 firms have entered the industry, and long- distance telephone rates have dropped sharply. Rates have fallen and service has improved.
41
Local Telephone Service As competition in long distance services increased, the monopoly nature of local rates became painfully apparent. Local rates kept increasing after 1983 while long-distance rates were tumbling.
42
Local Telephone Service New technologies permitted “wireless” companies to offer local service if they could gain access to the monopoly networks.
43
Local Telephone Service Congress passed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 requiring the Baby Bells to grant rivals access to their transmission networks.
44
Local Telephone Service The Baby Bells have been accused of charging excessive access fees, imposing overly complex access codes, requiring unnecessary capital equipment, and raising other entry barriers.
45
Local Telephone Service The FCC and state regulatory agencies lowered entry barriers in 2001-02 which allowed rivals to increase market share to 12 percent.
46
Airlines The Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) was created in 1938 to regulate airline routes and fares. Its primary objective was to ensure a viable system of air transportation for both large and small communities.
47
Airlines The focus of the CAB was on profit regulation. A secondary objective was to ensure air service to smaller, less-traveled communities.
48
Airlines Short hauls entail higher average costs and, therefore, higher fares. By fixing airfares, the CAB eliminated price competition between established carriers.
49
Airlines Regulators used cross-subsidization to keep local rates low. –Cross-subsidization – Use of high prices and profits on one product to subsidize low prices on another product.
50
No Entry The CAB was extremely effective in restricting entry into the industry. From 1938 until 1977 the CAB never awarded a major route to a new entrant.
51
No Price Competition The CAB eliminated price competition between established carriers. The CAB fixed airfares on all routes.
52
Bloated Costs Despite the high regulated fares, established carriers were unable to reap much profit. Costs rose as carriers used frequent flights and product differentiation to attract passengers.
53
Bloated Costs Profit regulation came to be regarded as a failure. –Airlines weren’t making substantial profits. –Consumers weren’t being offered very many price-service combinations.
54
New Entrants The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 eliminated the regulatory barrier to entry. Barriers to entry – Obstacles that make it difficult or impossible for would- be producers to enter a particular market.
55
New Entrants Between 1978 and 1985, the number of airline companies increased substantially. Price competition reduced average fares as much as 40 percent below regulated levels.
56
Increasing Concentration Unable to match lower fares and increased service, scores of airline companies exited the industry in the period 1985-95. The combined market share of the three largest carriers nearly doubled between 1985 and 1993.
57
Increasing Concentration Some companies have gained near monopoly power in specific “hub” airports. Ticket prices are 45 to 85 percent higher on monopolized routes than on routes where at least two airlines compete.
58
Entry Barriers Major carriers exploit their hub dominance, and keep rivals out through their ownership of landing slots.
59
Entry Barriers Defenders of deregulation argue that most airline markets are competitive. They argue the airline industry is a contestable market. Contestable market – An imperfectly competitive industry subject to potential entry if prices or profits increase.
60
Cable TV The cable TV industry has gone through both deregulation and re- regulation.
61
Deregulation The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 deregulated the industry. Congress believed that broadcast TV and related technologies offered sufficient competition to ensure consumers fair prices and quality service.
62
Reregulation After a period of rapid price growth, the industry was re-regulated in 1992. Cable operators were required to reduce prices by nearly 17 percent in 1993-94.. They claimed that the lost revenue will keep them from desired upgrades.
63
Deregulation The Telecommunications Turns Act of 1996 mandated that rate regulation be phased out and ended completely by March 1999. Cable prices soared again.
64
Annual Increase in Price of Basic Cable Service +5.1% Regulated Prices 1976 – 86 Deregulated Prices 1986 – 92 +9.5% Reregulated Prices 1992 – 95 +0.9% Deregulated Prices 1996–2002 +7.1%
65
Electricity The electric utility industry is the latest target for deregulation. The industry had long been regarded as a natural monopoly.
66
Bloated Costs, High Prices Critics complained that local utility monopolies allowed costs to rise and had little incentive to apply new technologies.
67
Demise of Power Plant Monopolies There is no longer a need to rely on a regional utility monopoly. New high-voltage transmission lines can carry power thousands of miles with negligible power loss.
68
Local Distribution Monopolies Although technology destroyed the basis for monopoly in power production, local natural monopoly in power distribution remain.
69
California’s Mistakes California legislation stripped local utilities of their production capacity. California utilities became totally dependent on third-party power producers.
70
California’s Mistakes A ceiling was placed on retail electricity prices, but not on wholesale prices. When wholesale prices rose sharply in 2000, many California utilities declared bankruptcy because retail prices were fixed too low.
71
Better Strategies Other states and countries have demonstrated how deregulation can generate much better results.
72
Deregulate Everything? In many industries, deregulation has resulted in more competition, lower prices, and improved service. Changing consumer demand, new technologies, and substitute goods had made existing regulations obsolete.
73
Deregulate Everything? One shouldn’t conclude that regulatory intervention never made sense just because the regulations later became obsolete.
74
(De)Regulation Of Business End of Chapter 12
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.