2.  In this experiment, we will endeavor to confirm the vitamin C and calcium percentages in various enhancement drinks including VitaCoco, orange juice, Vitamin Water, and LifeWater to determine which is best overall in terms of vitamin C and calcium content. The experiment will be conducted in two parts, using titrations with iodine and titrations of EDTA.

4.  Starch Solution: Make a paste of soluble starch (1 g) in water (10 mL) and pour into boiling water (100 mL). Boil until clear.  Iodine Solution: Dissolve KI (10.00 g) and KIO 3 (0.607 g) in distilled water (400 mL). Add 3M H 2 SO 4 (60 mL). Pour into a 1000 mL volumetric flask and dilute to mark with distilled water.

5.  Determination of Ascorbic Acid: Dissolve ascorbic acid (0.25 g) in water (100 mL) and dilute to 250 mL. Add 20 mL of ascorbic acid solution and 2 mL of starch to a 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask. Titrate with iodine solution until an endpoint is reached. (Dark blue colour) Repeat for three good trials.  Determination of drinks: Add 40 mL of the drink and 2 mL of starch to a 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask. Tirate until an endpoint is reached. (Dark blue colour) Repeat for three good trials. Repeat for all drinks.

6. Ascorbic Acid TrialIodine Added (mL) 110.62 211.27 310.96 411.04 Average10.97

7. VitaCoco TrialIodine Added (mL) 19.62 29.70 39.57 Average9.63 Minute Maid Orange Juice TrialIodine Added (mL) 113.41 213.84 313.74 Average13.66

8. Vitamin Water TrialIodine Added (mL) 115.75 215.86 315.74 Average15.78 Life Water TrialIodine Added (mL) 10.76 20.77 30.79 Average0.773

16.  Orange juice and the Vitamin Water were one of the best drinks for vitamin C. This was supported by the data provided and by the calculations. Whereas Vitacoco and the Life water were the worst offenders for vitamin C. Although Life Water had many issues we think that most of it was experimenter error and the amount of possible Iodine within the drink already. This can be easily seen by the low amount of Iodine added to notice a visible color change. Overall the experiment was a great success with low percent errors and high mg concentrations for each.

17.  A pH meter was used to calibrate ammonia buffer to a pH of 10.  A standard 0.1 M EDTA solution was made by dissolving 1.4072g EDTA in 8 mL buffer. This was diluted with water.  A calcium carbonate solution was made by reacting CaCl 2 in HCl.  Four sets of titrations were performed.  The lifewater, coconut water and vitamin water were made by pipetting 25 mL of the chosen beverage with 3 mL of buffer.  10 mL of the orange juice, 15 mL of water and 3 mL of buffer were added to a flask and titrated. The best 3 results out of the titrations were taken.

18. mL EDTA AddedMolarity of EDTA Trial 117.61 mL0.0085 M Trial 216.95 mL0.0088 M Trial 317.35 mL0.0086 M TrialmL EDTA Added 118.84 mL 218.81 mL 318.28 mL Vitamin Water: CaCO 3

19. TrialmL EDTA Added 19.49 mL 29.22 mL 39.28 mL TrialmL EDTA Added 117.59 mL 218.99 mL 318.83 mL Lifewater Coconut Water

20. TrialmL EDTA Added 19.41 mL 29.46 mL 310.06 mL Orange Juice

23. All the calculated results were of the amount of calcium in one bottle based on the percent of recommended daily value

24.  After observing our calculations, we determined that the most beneficial drink as far as calcium content was vitamin water. However, the drink that had the closest experimental value to the actual amount was orange juice. Overall, the lab was successful but the percent errors we received were high for most of the beverages. In the future, amounts of the beverage can be changed to better the experiment. One issue that arose was that a color change was often hard to see when titrating due to the various colors and opacity of the beverages.