1. Collaborative Recommender Systems for Building Automation Michael LeMay, Jason J. Haas, and Carl A. Gunter University of Illinois

2. Motivation: Future Building Automation Systems (BASs) will support a wide variety of control algorithms – Managers may not be able to determine which algorithm is the best on their own Approach: Use recommender system to help managers share opinions and quantitative comparisons of algorithms, to result in optimal performance Overview

3. Siebel Center for Computer Science – Centralized system permits monitoring and control of: HVAC Card-swipe door locks Motion sensors Lighting Sample Industrial BAS

4. Analyze electrical consumption at a few key points (e.g. each circuit breaker) to determine the states of the appliances attached to those points Many possible algorithms… – Threshold-based (incrementally adjust appliance states based on energy consumption changes) – 0-1 knapsack (computationally expensive) Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring

5. Increased occupant comfort relative to configuration effort Decreased energy consumption Decreased energy cost for a given level of consumption Better visibility into electrical consumption Possible BAS Benefits

6. Wholesale Prices are Highly Variable Real-time pricing for Midwest ISO, May 14 – June 10, 2007 300 %

7. Notifies customers of possible high prices a day ahead by email and current hourly prices by radio broadcast. Example: Power Smart Pricing in Illinois

8. BASs could deployed in a variety of environments: – Private homes – Hotels – Retail stores – Warehouses – Office buildings BAS Applicability

9. Private home with working parents and kids in school: – Occupied mostly from evenings through mornings and on weekends – Occasional guests with special requirements (e.g. extra heat or cold, use of guest room) Private home with homemaker and kids at home: – Occupied most of the day and night Hotel – Similar to first scenario, but occupants change every day or so and housekeepers stop by in middle of day Environmental Characteristics

10. Retail Store – Uniformly occupied for large portions of day by large quantities of people – Certain parts of store have special requirements (e.g. freezer section should be colder than other aisles) Warehouses – Sparsely occupied throughout the business day by highly-active people specially-equipped to operate in environment (e.g. wearing coats) – Particular sections may have special requirements, such as a small side-office Environmental Characteristics (cont.)

11. Office buildings – Segmented into many small spaces with varying requirements that are occupied throughout the business day by an infrequently-changing set of people. – A few spaces such as conference rooms will be unoccupied for many parts of the day, and have various groups of people in them in other parts of the day Environmental Characteristics (cont.)

12. Lighting algorithm that turns off lights when motion has not been detected for certain period of time: – In office: May turn off lights when person is relatively still, causing annoyance. – In retail store: Highly-effective, since shoppers rarely stop moving NILM algorithm that operates using thresholds: – Will be more effective in an environment with appliances that can be turned on and off than one with variable-speed motors, for example. Effect on Control Algorithm Effectiveness

13. Example #1: – Motion sensor detects occupant getting up in morning – BAS turns on hallway and kitchen lights – Not effective in a hotel where different occupants have different habits Example #2: – Motion sensor detects occupant in room, and subsequently turns on the lights to their maximum intensity. – The next day, when an occupant re-enters the room, the BAS automatically turns the lights to 2/3 of their maximum intensity. – The occupant immediately increases the intensity to the maximum. – The next day, the BAS uses 5/6 of maximum intensity, and the occupant is content, as indicated by the fact that they do not subsequently increase the intensity. – Again, not effective in environment with rapidly-changing sets of occupants with different preferences More Examples

14. Content-dependent: Recommendations made based on similarity of new items to items previously rated by user Content-independent: Recommender unaware of characteristics of items being recommended, except their ratings from other users – E.g. Social filtering: Generate new rating based on rating of others, giving more weight to ratings from “similar” users Amazon probably uses a hybrid: Recommends items similar to items I purchased previously, plus items purchased by other people with similar purchase histories. Recommender Systems

15. Evaluate similarity of building managers: Generate prediction: Social Filtering

16. Use a recommender system to recommend BAS algorithms to building managers Challenging to determine in general how similar the “contents” of algorithms are, so social filtering is a better choice in the context of BAS algorithms – Building managers fill out a survey characterizing their buildings so that their recommendations are weighted more highly with managers of similar buildings. Approach

17. CollaborVation Architecture Collaborative Recommender

18. Animated Operational Overview Energy Modeler Appliance Usage Detector Occupancy Detector Setpoint Generator Discomfort Predictor Energy Usage Predictor Energy Cost Predictor X10 USB Transceiver

19. We used the Duine recommender software for Java to rate individual module implementations Provides implementations for several recommender algorithms: User Average, TopN Deviation, etc. We selected Social Filtering – All ratings of a particular algorithm are weighted by the similarity between the building considering the algorithm and the building that generated the rating. – The weighted average of the ratings is the predicted rating of the algorithm in the “querying” building. Recommender System Prototype

20. Five buildings: Two apartments, two small retail stores, one industrial plant with a small office. Renters in apartments rate NILM algorithm #1 highly, and NILM algorithm #2 poorly Owner of retail store #1 rates NILM algorithm #2 poorly, and NILM algorithm #1 highly Owner of industrial plant rates both equally. Manager of store #2 requests a rating. The result? NILM algorithm #2 ranked lower than NILM algorithm #1, but the rating is slightly higher than the one provided by store #1 Recommender Example Scenario

21. BAS algorithms may become sufficiently numerous and complex that managers have difficulty independently selecting the best ones for their applications Recommender systems may help managers to select appropriate algorithms A loosely-coupled blackboard architecture permits BAS algorithms to be dynamically swapped when changes are recommended All technologies necessary for implementation are readily-available and reliable Conclusion

22. http://seclab.uiuc.edu Thank You!