Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDaniel Morgan Modified over 9 years ago
1
David A H Whiteman MD FAAP FACMG Global Clinical Sciences Leader Shire Pharmaceuticals
2
Full Time Employee and Stockholder Shire Pharmaceuticals Practicing Pediatrician and Biochemical & Medical Geneticist for 30 years prior to joining pharmaceutical industry
3
Health Canada: Life-threatening, severely debilitating or chronic disease that affects less than 5 in 10,000 Canadians Broadly consistent with the EU definition: Numerically similar result to the US, but more restrictive requiring severity and chronicity Being Rare alone does not define as a priority in Canada as in EU Europe: Commission on Public Health: "life-threatening or chronically debilitating diseases which are of such low prevalence that special combined efforts are needed to address them.” Low prevalence later defined <1 in 2,000 Europeans. Statistically rare, but NOT also life-threatening, chronically debilitating, or inadequately treated diseases are excluded from EU definition.
4
Japan: legal definition: affects fewer than 50,000 patients in Japan: ~ 1 in 2,500 Japanese US: "any disease or condition that affects less than 200,000 people in the United States,“ = about 1 in 1,500 Americans HOWEVER, CUMULATIVELY OVER ALL RD FAMILIES:- 1:12 prevalence 8% of the population 2.7M Canadians are in some way affected by 1 of ~7500 rare diseases, - of which 80% are genetic (but not necessarily hereditary) - of which 70% first manifest in infancy or childhood
5
Disease Population: Define Rare: Need for good epidemiology Natural History for comparators Registries & Natural History Studies Comparative Interventions / Standards of Care: Often no prior drug development in RD: Rx guidelines for “palliative” care are often lacking Other diseases comparisons not necessarily appropriate Disease Chronicity and Severity & Life-Threatening Definitions Multiple Medical Needs Multiple Patient and Family Psychosocial needs HCP Resources Access to knowledgeable HCPs Age appropriate outcome measures Blood and Tissue sampling/banking in children
6
“…Adequate and well-controlled studies…” In RD the numerical power demanded in traditional drug development studies often not feasible Alternative Clinical Trial Designs & Modeling Observational studies Registries and Outcome Surveys Very few rare diseases have validated PPRO instruments Small n and t trials often use no obvious PPRO comparators Use of existing generic HRQOL instruments may not appropriate to particular rare diseases
7
Low numerical power to detect Predicting possible adverse outcomes from targeted biology of drug: advantages and disadvantages Low frequency adverse events hard to predict/determine early in the development program Post Marketing Surveillance Studies Registries
8
Need, at a much earlier stage, for the kind of data that is typically obtained in large n, longer t studies Data quality and magnitude that is traditionally considered may not be available. Need to consider a longer term evaluation, post marketing requirements etc. Efficacy Endpoints & Outcomes: reflecting the NH Validation, Clinical Meaningfulness 6MWT Surrogates: biochemical, clinical Effectiveness Real World
9
Numbers: incidence, prevalence Natural history Patient outcome measures Surrogate measures validation Stratification of disease Post authorization monitoring beyond safety Adaptive authorization
10
Defining Value in Rare Disease Rx Development Requires a very broad view that respects, optimizes and balances the interests of patients, families, health care systems, risk holders, regulators and drug developers International collaborations: Clinical Development Networks Involve families, knowledgeable HCPs, regulators, HTA, & risk carriers from the earliest in the drug development process Often needs alternative regulatory pathways and incentives Often needs economic incentives to attract research and sponsors
12
Per-patient costs high: Overall budget impact may appear less so. Tolerance of risk holders depends on their size/budget Compare the Cost of Not Treating: Diagnostic odyssey costs Medical: visits, hospitalization, tests, monitoring Family: Social, Psychological, Monetary Society: Multiple Family impacts: lost productivity Production Technology Development Sustainability and Continued Availability of an effective product
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.