1. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 1 David Wild djwild@indiana.edu http://www.informatics.indiana.edu/djwild Chemical Informatics tools, services and workflows

2. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 2 Outline Chemical Informatics software packages available at IU Open source software The need for integration & innovation Pipelines, workflows and web services

3. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 3 Software at IUB Informatics Spotfire DecisionSite ChemTK ArgusLab BCI software – cluster analysis, fingerprints, Markush OpenEye software – 3D conformer, docking Chemaxon gNova CHORD Chemoinformatics programming toolkits –Daylight, BCI, OpenEye

4. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 4 Open Source / Free Software Blue Obelisk - http://wiki.cubic.uni- koeln.de/dokuwiki/doku.phphttp://wiki.cubic.uni- koeln.de/dokuwiki/doku.php InChI - http://www.iupac.org/inchi/http://www.iupac.org/inchi/ JMOL – http://jmol.sourceforge.nethttp://jmol.sourceforge.net FROWNS - http://frowns.sourceforge.net/http://frowns.sourceforge.net/ OpenBabel - http://openbabel.sourceforge.net/http://openbabel.sourceforge.net/ CML - http://cml.sourceforge.net/http://cml.sourceforge.net/ CDK - http://almost.cubic.uni-koeln.de/cdk/http://almost.cubic.uni-koeln.de/cdk/ MMTK - http://starship.python.net/crew/hinsen/MMTK/http://starship.python.net/crew/hinsen/MMTK/

5. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 5 The need for integration Research computing is currently very fragmented Existing approaches do not scale up to the amount of data now common Many chemical informatics tools are obscure, difficult to use and access Scientists’ questions are not that complex, but finding the answers is currently very time consuming and/or complex (for a human) –“has anybody patented this chemical structure I just made?” –“can I get hold of a compound that might bind to the active site of this protein I just resolved?” –“which compounds in this series are least likely to exhibit toxic effects?” Answers are often “stale” after a short period of time – questions need to be re-answered as new information is generated Almost all available systems are passive, and follow the (web) browsing model There tends to be one interface for every data source (or encompassing just a few)

6. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 6 Oracle Database (HTS) Compounds were tested against related assays and showed activity, including selectivity within target families Oracle Database (Genomics) ? None of these compounds have been tested in a microarray assay Computation The information in the structures and known activity data is good enough to create a QSAR model with a confidence of 75% External Database (Patent)  Some structures with a similarity > 0.75 to these appear to be covered by a patent held by a competitor Computation All the compounds pass the Lipinksi Rule of Five and toxicity filters Excel Spreadsheet (Toxicity) One of the compounds was previously tested for toxicology and was found to have no liver toxicity Word Document (Chemistry)  Several of the compounds had been followed up in a previous project, and solubility problems prevented further development Journal Article A recent journal article reported the effectiveness of some compounds in a related series against a target in the same family Word Document (Marketing)  A report by a team in Marketing casts doubt on whether the market for this target is big enough to make development cost-effective SCIENTIST “These compounds look promising from their HTS results. Should I commit some chemistry resources to following them up?” ?

7. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 7 Pipelining and workflow tools These tools permit applications to be “piped” together or connected in “workflows” where the output of one program can be given as input to another program (or script) Graphical front ends are replacing scripting – e.g. PERL, Python, etc Available graphical tools –Scitegic Pipeline Pilot - http://www.scitegic.comhttp://www.scitegic.com –Inforsense KDE - http://www.inforsense.com/http://www.inforsense.com/ –Taverna – http://taverna.sourceforge.nethttp://taverna.sourceforge.net –IO-Informatics Sentient – http://www.io-informatics.comhttp://www.io-informatics.com Find their real power in a web services environment

8. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 8

9. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 9

10. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 10

11. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 11 Web Services Semantic Web – “Next Big Thing” –Encode semantics in web pages (XML) –Describes services as well as information (SOAP, WSDL, UDDI) –Computation detached from interface –Note seeping through to general web usage http://www.google.com/apis/ http://www.amazon.com/webservices eScience (UK) –£200m over 2001-2006 period –http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/escience/http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/escience/ Cyber Infrastructure / Grid (US) –Semantic Web Health Care & Life Sciences Research Group - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/

12. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 12 CICC-related projects Formal CICC projects 1.Innovative cross-screen analysis of NIH DTP Human Tumor Cell Line Data – innovative scientific analysis of NIH HTS data 2.Development of cheminformatics web services and use cases in Taverna – web service & workflow infrastructure 3.Development of a novel interface for the analysis of PubChem HTS data – tools for interacting with lots of complex data 4.A structure storage and searching system for Distributed Drug Discovery – innovative kinds of chemical databases Other, related projects –Fast clustering of very large datasets using Linux clusters –Smart client for mining drug discovery data (Microsoft supported)

13. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 13 PROJECT 4 Experimental Databases PROJECT 2 Web services & workflows PROJECT 1 Innovative cross-screen analysis of HTS data PROJECT 3 Visualization, navigation & analysis tools for HTS data SMART CLIENT Smart interfaces (incl. NLP, RSS, agents, etc) SMART CLIENT General drug discovery web services & workflows SMART CLIENT Smart interfaces (incl. NLP, RSS, agents, etc) FAST PARALLEL CLUSTERING Using DivKmeans & AVIDD

14. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 14 Desired outcomes by Summer 2006 A chemical informatics web service infrastructure running at IU Several Taverna workflows that use these and other web services, and which demonstrate that the infrastructure can be used to perform complex, relevant operations on PubChem data Demonstrated scientific results with the NIH DTP data An established Distributed Drug Discovery database linked with PubChem, that shows that our techniques together with PubChem can be employed in ways which benefit humanity in general A sandbox PubChem copy with improved functionality and architecture One or more novel visualization tools for PubChem data Demonstrate the feasibility of fast, accurate clustering of very large datasets (including the whole of PubChem) using the AVIDD Linux Cluster and a parallelized clustering algorithm (DivKmeans) Show that.NET and Java-based web services can work well together in a common infrastructure Demonstrate the feasibility of a natural language or other straightforward interface for scientists to express their information needs

15. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 15 NIH Database Service PostgreSQL CHORD Fingerprint Generator BCI Makebits Cluster Analysis BCI Divkmeans Table Management VoTables Plot Visualizer VoPlot Docking Selector Script 2D-3D OpenEye OMEGA Docking OpenEye FRED 3D Visualizer JMOL Cluster the compounds in the NIH DTP database by chemical structure, then choose representative compounds from the clusters and dock them into PDB protein files of interest SMILES + ID Fingerprints PDB Database Service SMILES + ID + Data Cluster Membership SMILES + ID + + Cluster # + Data SMILES + ID MOL File PDB Structure + Box Docked Complex

16. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 16 “However large an array of facts, however rapidly they accumulate, it is possible to keep them in order and to extract from time to time digests containing the most generally significant information, while indicating how to find those items of specialized interest. To do so, however, requires the will and the means” “[we need to] get the best information in the minimum quantity in the shortest time, from the people who are producing the information to the people who want it, whether they know they want it or not” J.D. Bernal, quoted in Murray-Rust et. al., Org. Biomol. Chem., 2004, 2, 3192-3203

17. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 17 “Smart Client” for drug discovery An open-source prototype that implements a new model of data mining that would, on request, “push” relevant information to pharmaceutical scientists in response to previously-defined straightforward expressions of needs, rather than relying on them stumbling upon the right information using traditional “browsing” models. … using workflows and web services

18. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 18

19. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 19

20. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 20 Online database (e.g. PubChem) Local database 3D Docking Tool 2D-3D converter 3D visualizer UDDI New Structure Service Search online databases for recent structures Search local databases for recent structures Merge Results AGENT / SMART CLIENT Parse request Select appropriate use cases and/or web service(s) Schedule as necessary Request from Human Interface WSDL SOAP atomic services aggregate services USE-CASE SCRIPT Invoke New Structure Service Convert structures to 3D Dock results & protein file Extract any hits Return links for visualization

21. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 21 Prototype development plan Develop a handful of use-cases based around industry/academia scientists Build 5-6 data / computation sources (e.g. enumeration, property calculation, structure database) that can fulfill the use cases Build WSDL and SOAP web services around the data sources that can be accessed from Taverna Develop workflows in Taverna (see taverna.sourceforge.net) Publish web services in UDDI Encode use-cases into scripts Build Intelligent Agent / Smart Client node that can match user needs with scripts & web services using workflows Develop browser interface through Contextual Inquiry/Usability Studies Consider mapping to a Natural Language Interface

22. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 22 Use Case #1 Are there any good ligands for my target? A chemist is working on a project involving a particular protein target, and wants to know: –Any newly published compounds which might fit the protein receptor site –Any published 3D structures of the protein or of protein-ligand complexes –Any interactions of compounds with other proteins –Any information published on the protein target

23. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 23 Use Case #1 Are there any good ligands for my target? A chemist is working on a project involving a particular protein target, and wants to know: –Any newly published compounds which might fit the protein receptor site gNova / PostgreSQL, PubChem search, FRED Docking –Any published 3D structures of the protein or of protein-ligand complexes PDB search –Any interactions of compounds with other proteins gNova / PostgreSQL, PubChem search –Any information published on the protein target Journal text search

24. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 24 Use Case #2 Who else is working on these structures? A chemist is working on a chemical series for a particular project and wants to know: –If anyone publishes anything using the same or related compounds –Any new compounds added to the corporate collection which are similar or related –If any patents are submitted that might overlap the compounds he is working on –Any pharmacological or toxicological results for those or related compounds –The results for any other projects for which those compounds were screened

25. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 25 Use Case #2 Who else is working on these structures? A chemist is working on a chemical series for a particular project and wants to know: –If anyone publishes anything using the same or related compounds ~ PubChem search –Any new compounds added to the corporate collection which are similar or related gNova CHORD / PostgreSQL –If any patents are submitted that might overlap the compounds he is working on ~ BCI Markush handling software –Any pharmacological or toxicological results for those or related compounds gNova CHORD / PostgreSQL, MiToolkit –The results for any other projects for which those compounds were screened gNova CHORD / PostgreSQL, PubChem search

26. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 26 Priorities for web service development Search of PubChem –Wrap around HTTP or SOAP request Search of local gNova / PostgreSQL database –Wrap around application Molecular docking with OpenEye FRED –Wrap around application Property calculation with Molinspiration MiTools –Wrap around application PDB Search –Already implemented as EMBL web service BCI Markush search –Wrap around application Fast clustering of large datasets –Wrap around grid-based application Visualizations of datasets –Client and service development – VisualiSAR, Spotfire

27. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 27 Use Case - CICC Which of these hits should I follow up? An MLI HTS experiment has produced 10,000 possible hits out of a screening set of 2m compounds. A chemist at another laboratory wants to know if there are any interesting active series she might want to pursue, based on: –Structure-activity relationships –Chemical and pharmacokinetic properties –Compound history –Patentability –Toxicity –Synthetic feasibility

28. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 28 Use Case – ECCR Which of these hits should I follow up? An HTS experiment has produced 10,000 possible hits out of a screening set of 2m compounds. A chemist on the project wants to know what the most promising series of compounds for follow-up are, based on: –Series selection cluster analysis –Structure-activity relationships modal fingerprints/stigmata –Chemical and pharmacokinetic properties mitools, chemaxon –Compound history gNova / PostgreSQL –Patentability BCI Markush handling software –Toxicity –Synthetic feasibility –+ requires visualization tools!

29. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 29 Technology Perl SOAP::Lite –Will be used for initial web service development –Doesn’t really implement WSDL & UDDI Apache Axis & Tomcat –Deploy WSDL for web services BPEL4WS – Business Process Execution Language –For aggregation of web services –http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/specification/ws- bpel/http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/specification/ws- bpel/ Microsoft.NET & C#

30. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 30 Current activities Core activities –Development of use-cases –Development of initial web services (Perl SOAP::Lite) –Use of Taverna to prototype use-case scripts Basic research on future components –Organizing large amounts of chemical information for human consumption Development of very fast parallel clustering techniques – to be exposed as web services –Selection of interface-level tools for basic interaction Chemical structure drawing, display Investigation of email, NLP, RSS, and browser interfaces –Interface-level tools for visualization, navigation and analysis Cluster and dataset visualization, natural language interfaces)

31. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 31 Cluster Analysis and Chemical Informatics Used for organizing datasets into chemical series, to build predictive models, or to select representative compounds Organizational usage has not been as well studies as the other two, but see –Wild, D.J., Blankley, C.J. Comparison of 2D Fingerprint Types and Hierarchy Level Selection Methods for Structural Grouping using Wards Clustering, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences., 2000, 40, 155-162. Essentially helping large datasets become manageable Methods used: –Jarvis-Patrick and variants O(N 2 ), single partition –Ward’s method Hierarchical, regarded as best, but at least O(N 2 ) –K-means < O(N 2 ), requires set no of clusters, a little “messy” –Sphere-exclusion (Butina) Fast, simple, similar to JP –Kohonen network Clusters arranged in 2D grid, ideal for visualization

32. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 32 Limitations of Ward’s method for large datasets (>1m) Best algorithms have O(N 2 ) time requirement (RNN) Requires random access to fingerprints –hence substantial memory requirements (O(N)) Problem of selection of best partition –can select desired number of clusters Easily hit 4GB memory addressing limit on 32 bit machines –Approximately 2m compounds

33. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 33 Scaling up clustering methods Parallelisation –Clustering algorithms can be adapted for multiple processors –Some algorithms more appropriate than others for particular architectures –Ward’s has been parallelized for shared memory machines, but overhead considerable New methods and algorithms –Divisive (“bisecting”) K-means method –Hierarchical Divisive –Approx. O(NlogN)

34. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 34 Divisive K-means Clustering New hierarchical divisive method –Hierarchy built from top down, instead of bottom up –Divide complete dataset into two clusters –Continue dividing until all items are singletons –Each binary division done using K-means method –Originally proposed for document clustering “Bisecting K-means” –Steinbach, Karypis and Kumar (Univ. Minnesota) http://www- users.cs.umn.edu/~karypis/publications/Papers/PDF/doccluster.pdf –Found to be more effective than agglomerative methods –Forms more uniformly-sized clusters at given level

35. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 35 BCI Divkmeans Several options for detailed operation –Selection of next cluster for division –size, variance, diameter –affects selection of partitions from hierarchy, not shape of hierarchy Options within each K-means division step –distance measure –choice of seeds –batch-mode or continuous update of centroids –termination criterion Have developed parallel version for Linux clusters / grids in conjunction with BCI For more information, see Barnard and Engels talks at: http://cisrg.shef.ac.uk/shef2004/conference.htm http://cisrg.shef.ac.uk/shef2004/conference.htm

36. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 36 Comparative execution times NCI subsets, 2.2 GHz Intel Celeron processor 7h 27m 3h 06m 2h 25m 44m

37. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 37 Clustering a 1 million compound dataset on a 2.2 GHz Celeron Desktop Machine MethodTime *Memory Usage K-Means (10,000 clusters) 3½ days95 MB Divisive K-means7 days65 MB Divisive K-means (Parallel, 4 machines incl. 1.7 GHz Pentium M) 16½ hours~ 50 MB * Time for a single run may vary due to different selection of seeds. Runtimes can be shortened e.g. by using a max. number of iterations or a % relocation cutoff. Results from AVIDD clusters & Teragrid coming soon….

38. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 38 Divisive Kmeans: Conclusions Much faster than Ward’s, speed comparable to K-means, suitable for very large datasets (millions) –Time requirements approximately O(N log N) –Current implementation can cluster 1m compounds in under a week on a low-power desktop PC –Cluster 1m compounds in a few hours with a 4-node parallel Linux cluster Better balance of cluster sizes than Wards or Kmeans Visual inspection of clusters suggests better assembly of compound series than other methods Better clustering of actives together than previously-studied methods Memory requirements minimal Experiments using AVIDD cluster and Teragrid forthcoming (50+ nodes)

39. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 39 Visualization & interface level tools No matter how clever the smarts underneath, the overriding factor in usefulness will be the quality of scientists’ interaction with the system Contextual Design, Interaction Design (Cooper) and Usability Studies have proven effective in designing the right interfaces for the right people in chemical informatics [collaboration with HCI?] Possibility of multiple interfaces for different people groups (Cooper’s “primary personas”) Don’t assume the browser interface – email / NLP ? Start with the basics –2D chemical structure drawing (input) –Visualization of large numbers of chemical structures in 2D –3D chemical structure visualization Planning on evaluation of NLP, email, RSS, etc. as well as browser-based interfaces

40. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 40 Usability of 2D structure drawing tools Key difference between “sequential” and “random” drawers Huge difference in intuitiveness Key factor how badly you can mess things up Marvin Sketch ≈ JME > ChemDraw >> ISIS Draw

41. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 41 Visualization methods for datasets & clusters Partitions –Spreadsheets –Enhanced Spreadsheets –2D or 3D plots Hierarchies –Dendograms –Tree Maps –Hyperbolic Maps

42. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 42

43. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 43

44. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 44 VisualiSAR – with a nod to Edward Tufte. See http://www.daylight.com/meetings/mug99/Wild/Mug99.htmlhttp://www.daylight.com/meetings/mug99/Wild/Mug99.html

45. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 45 Tree Maps – very Tufte-esque

46. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 46 3D Visualization - JMOL Open Source, very flexible, works in a web service environment: jmol.sourceforge.net

47. Indiana University School of David Wild – I533 2006. Page 47 Conclusions so far Effective exploitation of large volumes and diverse sources of chemical information is a critical problem to solve, with a potential huge impact on the drug discovery process Most information needs of chemists and drug discovery scientists are conceptually straightforward, but complex (for them) to implement All of the technology is now in place to implement may of these information need “use-cases”: the four level model using service-oriented architectures together with smart clients look like a neat way of doing this The aggregation and interface levels offer the most challenges In conjunction with grid computing, rapid and effective organization and visualization of large chemical datasets is feasible in a web service environment Some pieces are missing: –Chemical structure search of journals (wait for InChI) –Automated patent searching –Effective dataset organization –Effective interfaces, especially visualization of large numbers of 2D structures (we’re working on it!)