Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEmil Poole Modified over 9 years ago
1
Thyroid Disease among A-bomb Survivors Exposed in Childhood Roy Shore, Kyoji Furukawa, Misa Imaizumi Radiation Effects Research Foundation shore@rerf.or.jp
2
Atomic Bomb Survivor Study Overview 2
3
A-bomb Study Characteristics Life Span Study Includes >86,000 survivors of all ages at exposure, with estimated doses and long follow-up for mortality (1950- 2008) and cancer incidence (1958-2009) Includes 13,000 exposed before age 5 and 9,500 at ages 5- 9, with a wide range of doses (1 mGy to >3 Gy) Adult Health Study (clinical examinations) Includes >2,600 under 10 years of age, given ultrasound screening 3
4
Thyroid Weighted Absorbed Dose (mGy) Thyroid dose distribution among those <10 years old at exposure is similar to these. Proportion (%) 37,164 23,107 6,7536,1416,545 3,795 2,214 952 Life Span Study (LSS) Thyroid Dose Distribution 4
5
Thyroid Cancer Risk in the Life Span Study (LSS) 5
6
Weighted absorbed thyroid dose (Gy) (Modeled for age 10 at exposure and age 60 at risk) (Furukawa et al, Int J Cancer, 132:1222-26, 2013) Excess Relative Risk (ERR) 4 3 2 1 0 0.00.51.01.52.02.5 ERR Gy -1 = 1.28 (95%CI 0.6, 2.7) LSS Thyroid Cancer: Dose-response 6
7
Study ERR (95% CI) per Gy EAR (95% CI) per 10 4 PY Gy per 10 4 PY Gy LSS (Furukawa 2013) (est. for IR at age 10) 1.3 (0.6, 2.7)3.0 (1.4, 5.0) Rochester thymus x-ray (age 0; Adams 2010) 3.2 (1.5, 6.6)2.2 (1.4, 3.2) Israel tinea capitis x-ray (ages 0-15; Sadetzki 2006) 20.2 (12, 32)9.9 (5.7, 15) Michael Reese tonsils x-ray (ages 0-15; Ron 1995) 2.5 (0.6, 26)3.0 (0.5, 17) Childhood cancer RT (pooled; Veiga 2012) 1.3 (0.7, 2.3)N.A. Comparison of LSS Thyroid Cancer Risk with Other Studies of Childhood External Radiation Exposure 7
8
Comparison of LSS Thyroid Cancer Risk with Chernobyl Studies of 131 I ExposureStudy ERR (95% CI) per Gy EAR (95% CI) per 10 4 PY Gy LSS (Furukawa 2013) (est. for IR at age 10) 1.3 (0.6, 2.7)3.0 (1.4, 5.0) Ukraine (screening, exposure ages 0-17; Brenner 2011) 1.9 (0.4, 6.3)2.2 (0.04, 5.8) Belarus (screening, exposure ages 0-18; Zablotska 2011) 2.2 (0.8, 5.5)N.A. Ukraine & Belarus (Ecological, ages 0-18; Jacob 2006) 18.9 (11, 27)2.7 (2.2, 3.1) 8
9
(Adapted from: Furukawa et al, Int J Cancer, 132:122-26, 2013) Thyroid Cancer Risk by Age at Exposure and Attained Age 9
10
Thyroid Disease at Clinical Examination in the Adult Health Study (AHS) 10
11
Methods for Diagnosis of Thyroid Diseases Thyroid examination at the routine AHS health examination Questionnaire: previous thyroid diseases and treatments, family history, seaweed intake Ultrasound examination (detected nodules ≧ 5mm) Aspiration biopsy (solid nodules ≧ 10mm) Blood tests Thyroid function : FT3, FT4, TSH Thyroid antibodies Tumor information from Tumor Registries Medical information (e.g. results of cytology, pathology) from hospitals (Imaizumi et al, 2013, unpublished) 11
12
12 Radiation Dose and Solid Thyroid Nodules, AHS Screening 0 2 4 6 8 10 02413 Odds Ratio Thyroid weighted absorbed dose, Gy EOR/Gy= 2.0 (95%CI 1.3, 2.9), n=464 nodules (Imaizumi et al, JAMA, 295:1011-22, 2006)
13
0 2 4 6 8 10 02413 0 2 4 6 8 02413 13 Odds Ratio Thyroid weighted absorbed dose, Gy EOR/Gy= 2.0 (95%CI 0.7, 4.9), n=70 cancers Odds Ratio Thyroid weighted absorbed dose, Gy EOR/Gy= 1.5 (95%CI 0.8, 2.7), n=156 nodules Radiation Dose, Thyroid Cancers and Benign Thyroid Nodules, AHS Screening Thyroid CancersBenign Nodules (Imaizumi et al, JAMA, 295:1011-22, 2006)
14
In Utero-exposed Clinical Cohort: Radiation Dose-response for Solid Thyroid Nodules 012 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Odds Ratio Maternal Uterine Dose (Gy) Solid Nodules OR at 1 Gy = 2.78 (95% CI: 0.50, 11.8) P = 0.22 (Imaizumi et al, J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:1641-8) 14
15
Summary of RERF Radiation and Thyroid Effects Over the dose range 0-2 Gy, a linear model fits reasonably well. Linear dose-response risk estimate is comparable to nearly all other studies of external irradiation and Chernobyl thyroid studies For those with <100 mGy: Increased risk is uncertain, due to little risk and/or limited statistical power. Those exposed at young ages are clearly at the highest thyroid cancer risk. Little risk is seen for those exposed as adults. Thyroid cancer risk continues for >50 years after exposure. Risk of benign solid thyroid nodules is increased by radiation Probably a dose-related risk of thyroid nodules after in utero exposure, though this study lacked statistical power to fully determine 15
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.