2. Segment Duration and Vowel Quality in German Lexical Stress Perception Klaus J. Kohler University of Kiel, Germany Paper presented at Speech Prosody 2012 Shanghai 25 May, 2012

3. 1Research question Cues to perception of lexical stress extensively studied –especially in Germanic languages –since Fry’s experimental analyses for English hierarchy of descending weight of cue values –f0 change –syllable, especially vowel, duration –energy –spectral expansion in vowels f0 as a cue to lexical stress has been conflated with sentence accent, manifested on stressed syllable

4. recent study by van Heuven & de Jonge 2011 –lexical stress perception in Dutch canon /    / ‘canon, round song’ ~ kanon /  / ‘cannon’ –test word in post-accentual low pitch tail excludes f0 –varies duration of first vowel and of second syllable rhyme in complementary fashion, as well as 1st vowel spectrum, in 7x7 design –disyllabic temporal structure is strong cue to stress perception –spectral expansion/reduction is very weak, only noticeable when timing cue is ambiguous –conclusion: spectrum = weakest of the 4 cues

5. Dutch research question applied to German –contrastive stressed - unstressed and unstressed - stressed word pair Kaffee /'kafe:/ “coffee” and Café /ka'fe:/ (the locality) –test words placed in low f0 tail as in Dutch exp. –but also in high plateau of hat pattern –in both cases eliminating the cue of f0 change –I produced the two test words in each of two sentence frames, with low f0 tail and high f0 plateau, respectively

6. °Wir treffen uns "regelmäßig beim  Kaffee/Ca  é dort an der  Ecke. “We "regularly meet for  coffee on the  corner.” “We "regularly meet at the  café on the  corner.” °Wir treffen uns 'regelmäßig beim 'Kaffee/Ca'fé dort an der 'Ecke. “We 'regularly meet for 'coffee on the 'corner.” “We 'regularly meet at the 'café on the 'corner.”

9. acoustic properties of test word productions –stressed vowels longer than unstressed –and more peripheral –intervocalic consonant longer and stronger in unstressed - stressed than in stressed - unstressed

10. Hypotheses 1.effect of bisyllabic vowel duration 2.effect of bisyllabic vowel quality 3.effect of intervocalic consonant duration 4.local effects are cumulative 5.global prosody effects

11. 2Stimulus generation L2SL1SEQUS1LS2L low-tail120-80110-90100-10090-11080-120 high- plateau 135-95125-105115-115105-12595-135 2 f0 frames: Fh - Fl 2 words with different vowel qualities: Kaffee Wk – Café Wc 2 intervocalic fricatives: long Cl – short Cs 5 disyllabic vowel durations in ms

12. 3Test 2 x 2 x 5 x 2 = 40 stimuli 5 repetitions 2 randomized test files: 100 Fl and 100 Fh stimuli 2 listening tests in one session 16 native speakers of German, students of languages and linguistics responses: pressing initial-stress Kaffee or final- stress Café button of the Kiel reaction measuring instrumentation

13. 4Results

15. 5Discussion and Conclusion Inferential statistics shows significant main effects for duration, vowel qualities (words) and intervocalic fricative duration, but not for f0 frame. The effects are cumulative Hypotheses 1-4 have thus been confirmed. It may be concluded that there is no general hierarchy of cue values in the signalling and perceptual decoding of lexical stress in German: the ranking of the different acoustic properties is defined afresh for any new segment – prosody embedding. This may be extrapolated to all languages that have the category of lexical stress.