1. MSD P13038 Hearing Aid Design System Design Review January 11, 2012

2. Team Members 1.11.13 Alissa Anderson Team Manager Conor Murphy System Integration Engineer Ronald Dries Lead Electrical Kelly Murosky Lead Mechanical Nanxi Yu EDGE Master Paula Garcia Secretary Eric Lew Budget Master Marbella Vidals Customer Relations Sarah Brownell Guide

3. Agenda 1.11.13 Project Overview (5 minutes) - Background - Motivation - Major customer needs, specs, and functions Mechanical Design (10 minutes) - Enclosure renderings - Mechanical architecture - Hot Topic: User-centered design Electrical Design (20 minutes) - Electrical architecture - Hot Topic: micro-processor selection and power distribution Software Design (15 minutes) - Software architecture - Hot Topic: System simulation and filtering methods Project Plan (10 minutes) - Critical Path - Major risk summary - Budget review

4. Background & Motivation 1.11.13 Expected Project Benefits: (1) De-stigmatize hearing aids as medical devices by creating an audio accessory that is socially accepted and used by both hearing and hard of hearing individuals. (2) Provide hard-of-hearing market with an alternative hearing aid device that offers similar features contained within a new physical form (3) Project is to serve as an initial proof of concept for future MSD projects to focus on improvements in device adjustability and functionality Target Audience: hearing and hard-of-hearing, young hearing aid users Oticon, Agile

5. Functional Decomposition 1.11.13 amplify sound process sound capture sound modify sound filter sound adjust by frequency supply power store energy transform energy output energy accept energy interface with user accept ear fits comfortably protects user resists water and shock controls volume manages heat program device accepts data stores data user input recognizes input stores input adjusts system to input raise sound level track power level modify function to data output sound

6. Design Constraints (ME/ID) 1.11.13 Customer NeedRankDescription CN29The device fits most adult ears ages 15-25years CN39The device does not draw attention to the user as a hard of hearing individual CN49 The device supports an active lifestyle (stays on the ear during everyday activities and light activities) CN79The device is rechargeable by computer USB port SpecSourceSpecificationDirection Units of measure MarginalIdeal S9 CN2, CN4, CN11 Range of adult ear size accommodatedmaxpercentile25th to 75th10th to 90th S10 CN4, CN6, CN10, CN11 Weight of earpieceming<15<12 S14CN3 Percent of serveyed people who identify a picture of the device as something other than a hearing aid. maxpercent>60>80 S15CN3 Percent of surveyed hard of hearing people who prefer the form of the new device to standard behind the ear hearing aids maxpercent>50>75 S17CN11 Percent of surveyed people who feel the device is comfortable to wear maxpercent>60>80

7. Benchmarking 1.11.13

8. Enclosure Proposal 1.11.13 Key Features: Processes and amplifies sound based on custom user hearing profiles Rechargeable power source Reprogrammable software for changes in user application Interfaces with USB 2.0 User control of volume, power, and profile setting Interfaces with standard ear tube and ear mold styles (custom fit, dome, etc.) Optimized number and location of microphones for sound capture

9. Enclosure Proposal 1.11.13 detachable “Transfer Module”

10. Design Constraints (EE) 1.11.13 Customer NeedRankDescription CN19The device amplifies sound CN79The device is rechargeable by computer USB port Spec #SourceSpecification Directi on Units of measure MarginalIdeal S1CN1Lowest level of sound detectedmindB<60<30 S2CN1Frequencies amplifiedmaxHzN/A85-8000 S3CN1, CN6Maximum amplificationtargetdB85-9590 S5CN7Time to charge earpieceminminutes<60<30 S7CN7 Connects to standard USB 2.0 computer port targetyes/no yes S12CN8 Earpiece battery life at maximum amplification maxhours>16>48

11. Proposed Budget 1.11.13 ItemQtyCost ea.Total Evaluation Boards7$200$1400 Microphones2$100$200 Microprocessor3$150$450 Amplifier components1$70 Speaker2$50$100 USB Interface1$20 Rechargeable Battery10$15$150 PCB4$50$200 Acoustic Test Stand1$500 3D Printing Costs7$75$525 MiscellaneousXX$1000 TOTAL$4615

12. Timeline: Critical Dates 1.11.13 DateEventDRI Jan 7 Enclosure sketches due (select 2 potential product options) Finalize scope, deliverables, needs ID Jan 11System Design ReviewALL Jan 17Order Eval Boards EE February 7 Printed Circuit Board (PCS) 1.0 Printed Enclosure Alpha Printed EE February 15Detailed Design ReviewALL March 29 Final PCB printed and on campus (for integration) Final enclosure printed (for integration) ME April 1Start integration and debugALL April 26WORKING PROTOTYPE DUEALL May 4Imagine RITALL May 10Final MSD Review (Week 10)ALL

13. Risk Assessment 1.11.13 IDRisk ItemEffectCause Likelih ood Severity Impor tance Action to Minimize RiskOwner 1 Project Scope too large due to large scope, deliverable list is too large and project is not completed on time Team approves too many deliverables; poor resource planning; poor benchmarking and feasibility causes team to believe they have the resources to complete a task 339 Focus on main goals of project, discuss, research, and prove feasibility of optional functionality. Discuss goals of project with guide and experts to determine feasibility and likelihood of success. Drop dead date for deliverable list is at system design review (Friday Week 5) Team Lead, Engineerin g Leads 5 Difficulty getting electronics small enough for hearing aid Prototype is larger then originally intended Components chosen too large, not enough space left for electronics in main hearing aid shell. System integration not thought of before mechanical and electrical systems are built 339 Keep small form factor in mind when choosing technologies and functionality Lead Electrical Engineer / System Integration Engineer 10 No experience/exper tise with ON Semi chip DSP Hybrid chip If chosen, could run out of time, not have a happy customer, potential product failure Too difficult to implement, Run out of time trying to learn new product 339 Seek advice from experts at ON Semi, Plan for difficult implementation and put a large amount of scheduled time Lead Electrical Engineer/ Systems Engineer 15 Team member feels overloaded with work from MSD team loses support and quality of work from stressed team member. team member loses motivation to work for the team Team member volunteers for too many projects; unbalances work assignments; team member is under qualified for assigned tasks and does not seek necessary support (or vocalize need for support) 339 team manager should monitor work loads of team members to help facilitate an equal distribution of work; individual team members should speak up (to manager or team) if they feel over loaded or that the work is not equally divided among qualified members team members (and team manager)

14. Backup

15. MatLab 1.11.13 Code Overview: amplifies sound and reduces noise for a patient with “ski-slope” hearing loss Frequency Shaper: Breaks hearing loss into piecewise functions and calculates the required gain for each section Applies Fourier Transform on the input signal, and multiplies transformed signal by the required gain function The Inverse Fourier Transform of the signal converts signal back to the time domain. Amplitude Shaper: Output signal is inputted into an amplitude shaper to remove noise and confirms signal is in acceptable (not harmful) range.

16. Types of Ear Molds 1.9.13 Oticon Intiga Hearing aid with “dome” style earmold Oticon DigiFocus II Hearing aid with “custom” style earmold Motorola HK200 Bluetooth Headset, “dome” style earmold

17. Customer Needs 1.11.13 Customer NeedRankDescription CN19The device amplifies sound CN29The device fits most adult ears ages 15-25years CN39The device does not draw attention to the user as a hard of hearing individual CN49The device supports an active lifestyle (stays on the ear during everyday activities and light activities) CN59The device includes a way for the user to adjust the volume while on the ear CN69The device is safe to use CN79The device is rechargeable by computer USB port CN83The power in the earpiece should lasts at least 48 non-continuous hours CN93The device interfaces with a standard tube and ear mold CN103The weight of the device is similar to existing earpieces CN113The device is comfortable to wear CN123The device does not generate excessive heat during use or charging CN131 The device includes an additional method for toggling between functions (for later use to switch between programs or turn on Bluetooth, etc.) CN141The device has a cost similar to current devices when in production CN150Optional: The device communicates with a cell phone or music player by Bluetooth CN160Optional: The device has noise cancellation capabilities

18. Specifications 1.11.13 Spec #SourceSpecificationDirectionUnits of measureMarginalIdealNotesDRI S1CN1Lowest level of sound detectedmindB<60<30lowest range of normal hearingEE S2CN1Frequencies amplifiedmaxHz300-700085-8000 marginal values are those used in radio, 85 is lowest male voice EE S3CN1, CN6Maximum amplificationtargetdB85-9590max considered safeEE S4CN5Levels of volume adjustmentmaxlevels520adjusted in steps or continuousEE S5CN7Time to charge earpieceminminutes<60<30 EE S7CN7Connects to standard USB 2.0 computer porttargetyes/no yes EE S8CN11, CN12Maximum temperature at outside surface of deviceminoFbody temp + 10body temp MEE E S9CN2, CN4, CN11Range of adult ear size accommodatedmaxpercentile25th to 75th10th to 90th ISE S10 CN4, CN6, CN10, CN11 Weight of earpieceming<15<12 marginal values will depend on ergonomic info ISE S12CN8Earpiece battery life at maximum amplificationmaxhours>16>48 EE S14CN3 Percent of serveyed people who identify a picture of the device as something other than a hearing aid. maxpercent>60>80 team should conduct surveys (at imagine RIT? thoughts?) ID S15CN3 Percent of surveyed hard of hearing people who prefer the form of the new device to standard behind the ear hearing aids maxpercent>50>75team should conduct surveysID S16CN3 Percent of surveyed hearing people who would use the device for Bluetooth or music listening maxpercent>50>70team should conduct surveysID S17CN11 Percent of surveyed people who feel the device is comfortable to wear maxpercent>60>80team should conduct surveysID S18CN9Attaches to a standard ear tube and ear moldyes/no yes maybe should interview audiologist for final decision ID S19CN14Manufactured cost (estimated)min$<2000<1000 not as important in first round of prototyping, but should be considered ISE

19. User Interface Logic Board Enclosure Dummy Ear mold Speaker Microphone USB Battery System Architecture (Physical) 1.11.13 Ear Tube