Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJuliana Montgomery Modified over 9 years ago
1
Sniper Localization Using Acoustic Sensors Allison Doren Anne Kitzmiller Allie Lockhart Under the Direction of Dr. Arye Nehorai December 11, 2013 [6]
2
Outline Background Muzzle Blast Model Sniper Localization Maximum Likelihood Cramér-Rao Bound Mean Square Error Results Detection Conclusions
3
Background Existing Work: “Shooter Localization in Wireless Microphone Networks,” comparing muzzle blast and shock wave models and using Cramér-Rao lower bound analysis [1] “Analysis of Sniper Localization for Mobile, Asynchronous Sensors”, relying on time difference of arrival measurements, and providing a Cramér-Rao bound for the models [2] “ShotSpotter” uses acoustic sensors to detect outside gunshot incidents in the D.C. area [5] Applications: Military Operations: can be worn by soldiers or placed in vehicles Civilian Environments: can detect gunfire to alert local authorities Example of a sensor network [2] = sensor = shooter
4
Types of Models 1.Shockwave Model (SW) Exploits the shockwave of a gun shot, which comes about as a result of the supersonic bullets 2.Muzzle Blast Model (MB) Exploits the “bang” of a gun shot 3.Combined Model (Shockwave and Muzzle Blast) The shockwave from the supersonic bullet reaches the microphone before the muzzle blast [1]
5
Muzzle Blast Model: First Step
6
Muzzle Blast Model: Second Step e
8
Cramér-Rao Bound The Cramér-Rao Bound (CRB) is a lower bound on the variance of an unbiased estimator We use a Multivariate Normal Distribution, because TDOA vector has a length equal to N-1
9
Cramér-Rao Bound CRB for Multivariate Case The Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) for N-variate multivariate normal distribution
10
Cramér-Rao Bound
12
Mean Square Error
13
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)
14
Results
15
(a) Sensor network and shooter position(b) Localization error of position Placement of sensors in Matlab model and localization error Variance = 0.01 Minimum values of error at (0,0), our true sniper location
16
Comparison of localization performance on various six sensor geometries Sensor Network Geometry Shooter surrounded by sensors is ideal, but not practical Line of sensors does not provide sufficient information
17
Comparison of localization performance on various random sensor geometries Sensor Network Geometry Increased number of sensors increases accuracy, but not realistic to have this many sensors in close range
18
MSE of sniper position (x, y) vs. SNR As the signal-to-noise ratio increases, error decreases Thus as noise increases, error increases MSE of position vs. SNR
19
r MSE converges to the CRB as SNR increases
20
Detection - general
21
Detection of a shot
23
ROC Curve ROC Curve generated from detection applied in the scalar case (2 sensors) PDPD
24
Conclusions We used the Maximum Likelihood Method, Cramér-Rao Bound, and Mean Square Error in the Muzzle Blast Model to analyze our simulated shooter data, with different values of variance (noise) As predicted, MSE increases as noise increases MSE converges to the CRB as SNR increases We studied the concept of detection and applied it to the scalar case of detecting a sniper with two sensors We would have liked to compare our results to actual data obtained from sensors Further Research Adding walls or other obstacles to sensor model Using different types of sensors, ie. optical, infrared Explore shockwave or combined MB-SW model Compare results to real data
25
References 1.D. Lindgren, O. Wilsson, F. Gustafsson, and H. Habberstad, “Shooter localization in wireless sensor networks,” Information Fusion, 2009, FUSION ’09, 12 th International Conference on, pp. 404-411, 2009. 2.G. T. Whipps, L. M. Kaplan, and R. Damarla, “Analysis of sniper localization for mobile, asynchronous sensors,” Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition XVIII, vol. 7336, 2009. 3.P. Bestagini, M. Compagnoni, F. Antonacci, A. Sarti, and S. Tubaro, “TDOA-based acoustic source localization in the space-range reference frame,” Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. March, 2013. 4.Stephen, Tan Kok Sin. (2006). Source localization using wireless sensor networks (Master’s thesis). Naval Postgraduate School, 2006. Web. Sept 2013. 5.Berkowitz, Bonnie, Emily Chow, Dan Keating and James Smallwood. “Shots heard around the District.” The Washington Post 2 Nov. 2013. Investigations Web. Nov. 2013. 6.Photograph of Sniper. Photograph. n.d. Shooter Localization Mobile App Pinpoints Enemy Snipers. Vanderbilt School of Engineering. Web. 11 Nov 2013. 7.Hogg, Robert V., and Allen T. Craig. Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. New York: Macmillan, 1978. 90-98. Print.
26
Thank You! Thank you to Keyong Han, the PhD student who has been guiding us throughout this project. Thank you to Dr. Arye Nehorai for all of his help in overseeing our work and our progress.
27
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.