Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBeatrice Morrison Modified over 9 years ago
1
www.bea.gov Tracking Personal Income for Metropolitan Areas Robert L. Brown Association for Public Data Users Washington, DC September 25, 2009
2
www.bea.gov 2 BEA Regional Personal Income ▪ Consistent time series with BEA national statistics ▪ Timely State—3 months Metro—8 months County—12-16 months ▪ Industrial structure of earnings and compensation
3
www.bea.gov 3 Nationwide ▪ 2008 US personal income growth 3.3% Down from 6.0% in 2007 ▪ Of the 366 metro areas… 322 (88%) metro areas slowed 42 (11%) metro areas increased in growth
4
www.bea.gov 4 US Industry Compensation
5
www.bea.gov 5
6
6 Metro Growth Declines ▪ Personal income declined in 5 small MSAs Manufacturing caused 4 declines Dalton, GA (-0.6%) Monroe, MI (-0.7%) Elkhart, IN (-2.7%) Kokomo, IN (-3.5) Hurricane Katrina after-effects Gulfport, MS (-2.4%)
7
www.bea.gov 7 5 Slowest Growing Large Metros ▪ In Sunbelt San Jose, CA (0.9%)--Manufacturing Phoenix, AZ (1.3%)--Construction Jacksonville, FL (1.5%)--Construction Tampa, FL (1.7%)--Construction ▪ In Great Lakes Detroit (1.3%)--Manufacturing
8
www.bea.gov 8 Fastest Growing Metros ▪ Benefitting from high oil prices Midland, TX (11.5%) Odessa, TX (11.1%) Grand Junction, CO (10.2%) ▪ Benefitting from Military “Grow the Force” Initiative Jacksonville, NC (11.2%) Manhattan, KS (9.7%) Hinesville, GA (9.2%)
9
www.bea.gov 9 Fastest Growing Metros ▪ Benefitting from Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend Payments Fairbanks, AK (9.1%) Anchorage, AK (8.8%)
10
www.bea.gov 10 Fast Growing Large Metros ▪ 5 of 6 fastest in Texas and Oklahoma Mining and construction Oklahoma City, OK (6.9%) Houston, TX (6.3%) San Antonio, TX (5.4%) Construction only Dallas-Fort Worth, TX (4.6%) State government Austin, TX (5.4%) ▪ St. Louis, MO food and beverage (5.6%)
11
www.bea.gov 11 Economic Stimulus Payments ▪ $24.7 billion in tax rebates from the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 ▪ Accounts for 0.2% of US growth in 2008 ▪ More to lower per capita income metros in Southeast and to Mexican border metros
12
www.bea.gov 12 Summary ▪ Slow metro growth concentrated in Great Lakes, Florida, California, and Arizona Due to Manufacturing and Construction ▪ Fast metro growth concentrated in Texas and Oklahoma Mostly due to Mining and Construction
13
www.bea.gov 13
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.