1.  WG Practice based learning Seminar Madrid

2. Goals  The results of this working group should lead to more practice placements abroad  The results of this working group should lead to a structural exchange of best practices (from teacher perspectives as well as student perspectives)  The results of this working group give the different institutions the opportunity to solve the “problem” of clinical placements

3. This seminar  Focus on main topic: raising quality of information exchange  Three subgroups  Platform  Uniform information  Language

4. Results  Networking platform (detailed info will be on ENPHE website)  Quality of learning environment  Number of placements abroad  To do until Ghent  technical part it-people  Warm up ENPHE universities (ISB members are giving information/ introduction  6 months ready to test (start trial )

5. Uniformity in core information  Screening students  Form: Gives info about student (what is he capable of) different topics  Steps to take:  share and test tool under international coordinators Ready in Ghent  Profiling universities  Ready next seminar

6. Language barriere  Marketing tool to be used for acquiring supervisors/practices,  list is ready  Toolbox language on ISB part of the website (apps, online language courses, translated PT forms etc)  Buddy system (ISB contact, other student )  qualifications and task are ready

7. Other results  Intensive collaboration with students from beginning on!  Proof that we can co-create as equal partners  Proof that we need each other especially on this topic placements to improve quality of placements abroad

8. So where do we stand? Related to the goals:  The results of this working group should lead to more practice placements abroad  The results of this working group give the different institutions the opportunity to solve the “problem” of clinical placement  Finishing the last steps to take concerning the information exchange Related to the goal  The results of this working group should lead to a structural exchange of best practices (from teacher perspectives as well as student perspectives)  Not finished

9. Future plans  Information exchange is ongoing proces  Out of aims of WG Possible aims of the WG  Focus on best practices  Practice placements in 21st century learning  Assessment Reconsider the WG´S?  Overlap with other WG: consider merging groups  Reflection in Ghent?

10. WG members Teachers  Tijmen Koet  Milda Zukauskiené  Marian Kooimans  Gert Jan Kordes  Gemma Pampalona  Olga Velasco Roldán  Yolanda Sanchez  Marleen Hazeveld ISB Students  Katrine Fritzen  Eeva Lehtinen  Benjamin Rasmussen  Claire Testa  Jason Cunden

11. And special thanks to  All new students and teachers who joined this seminar