1. 1 Western Wind and Solar Integration Study Site Selection Analysis 5/14/2008

2. 2

3. 3

4. 4

5. 5

6. 6 Transmission Zones used in Site Selection

7. 7

8. 8

9. 9

10. 10 2017 Load Analysis

11. 11

12. 12

13. 13

14. 14

15. 15

16. 16

17. 17

18. 18

19. 19

20. 20

21. 21

22. 22

23. 23 “In Area” Sites

24. 24 “High Capacity Factor” Sites

25. 25 In Area Scenario

26. 26 In Area Scenario

27. 27 High Capacity Factor Scenario

28. 28 High Capacity Factor Scenario

29. 29

30. 30

31. 31 RegionSites Required Annual Energy (GWH) Average Capacity Factor (%) Inside Study Footprint69986,92947.3% Outside Study Footprint1,176121,45639.3% Total1,875208,38442.3% High Capacity Factor Scenario

32. 32 Summary Comments Pre-Selected capacity represents existing and planned sites rounded up to nearest 30 MW. -Ignore “planned” sites in Scenario creation. How much capacity can be reasonably exported (imported) at each area? Assume constant energy between scenarios rather than constant number of plants: Avg Wyoming C.F/Avg Arizona Plant = 49.1/32.0 = 1.53 ~Roughly 2 MW of wind in Wyoming produces the same energy as 3 MW of wind in Arizona. Initial Study Scenarios:Baseline (I.e. Pre-Selected Sites) High Renewables: - In Area Subsequent Scenarios:High Capacity Factor “Constrained” High Capacity Factor

33. 33 Summary Comments Transmission costs estimated at $1350/MW mile. New Wind plant costs estimated at $1750/KW. Therefore saving a MW of wind capacity would pay for roughly 1300 miles of transmission. Phoenix, AZ to central Wyoming is about 650 miles, so a MW of Wind capacity would pay for the cost of 2 MW of transmission.

34. 34

35. 35

36. 36 Summary Comments - Solar How much existing Solar generation is there? -Can we ignore Solar in the Baseline? Does existing Solar generation match up with CSP and PV site data?