Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byVivian George Modified over 9 years ago
1
Building Open Science Luis Ibáñez Kitware, Inc. The Insight Journal
2
The Vision Fully-Electronic publication Freely available Fast publishing Reproducibility enforced Open Data Open Source Open Documents Open Forum
3
Insight Journal Kitware project funded by the National Library of Medicine Program Officer: Dr. Terry Yoo
4
NLM : champion of Open Access Open Data : Visible Human Open Source: Insight Toolkit Open Publications
5
NIH Policy on Public Access
6
Memo from Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D.
7
NIH Policy on Public Access http://www.nih.gov/about/publicaccess/index.htm Beginning May 2, 2005, NIH-funded investigators are requested to submit to the NIH National Library of Medicine's (NLM) PubMed Central (PMC) an electronic version of the author's final manuscript upon acceptance for publication, resulting from research supported, in whole or in part, with direct costs from NIH. The author's final manuscript is defined as the final version accepted for journal publication, and includes all modifications from the publishing peer review process.
8
NIH Policy on Public Access http://www.nih.gov/about/publicaccess/index.htm This policy applies to all research grant and career development award mechanisms, cooperative agreements, contracts, Institutional and Individual Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards, as well as NIH intramural research studies.
9
NIH Policy on Public Access http://www.nih.gov/about/publicaccess/index.htm The Policy now requests and strongly encourages that authors specify posting of their final manuscripts for public accessibility as soon as possible (and within 12 months of the publisher's official date of final publication).
10
Scientific Publishing
11
The Current State No journal enforces REPRODUCIBILITY No journal publishes CODE, DATA and PARAMETERS No journal publishes NEGATIVE results No journal publishes REPLICATION of work
12
The Current State Current time to publication is too long ( 1 ~ 2 years) Actual time spent in peer-review does not justify two years of not returning results to taxpayers Code reimplementation is a waste of time.
13
By Developers for Developers A Journal where you want to publish A Journal that you want to read A Journal that will give you practical solutions
14
Insight Solution Open SourceOpen Science Agile ProgrammingAgile Publishing Insight ToolkitInsight Journal
15
Submission Code Input Data Journal CVS Repository Web Site Results Data Author Build Machines PDF doc
16
Peer-Review (A) Reviewer Selected Papers Checked Paper Reviewer Checked Paper Checked Paper Checked Paper Web Site Checked Paper
17
Peer-Review (B) Posted Paper Reader 1 Posted Paper Posted Paper Posted Paper Web Site Rating Reader 2 by rating by subject by author Query Rating
19
Enjoy Open Science !
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.