1. Measuring Attitudes of Israelis Towards Human Rights Issues and Organizations A Benchmark Survey 3 December 2008

2. Poll Methodology Conducted by KEEVOON Research 503 Jewish Israelis 25 Questions 27 Nov. – 1 Dec. 2008 Telephone survey Representative, random sample + / - 4.5% Margin of Error

3. Main Findings Human Rights issues are VERY important to Israelis “NGO brand” is weak in Israel No clear favorite among NGOs Israel perceived as BETTER on Human Rights than neighbors and other Western Democracies Correlation between age, education, religious observance Israelis think that publicizing human rights violations hurts Israel NGOs are perceived as favoring Palestinians & biased against Israel Israelis want to know where source funding for NGOs comes Israelis believe their own GOVT agencies over NGO reports

4. On a scale of 1-10, with 1 being VERY LITTLE and 10 being VERY MUCH, how important is the issue of HUMAN RIGHTS in Israel to you personally? 5%1 – 5 6%6 - 7 89%8 - 10 59% chose 10

5. Results of those who answered 10, VERY MUCH Misc. 67% European/US born 67% Residents of south 67% Women (52% Men) 64% Haredim (43% Religious) 61% Secular & Traditional 17% Soldiers 2006 Vote 85% Shas 77% Pensioners 73% Meretz 71% UTJ 67% Likud 63% Kadima 57% Labor 49% Yisrael Beiteinu 35% NRP

6. Of the following NGOs that deal with Human Rights issues in Israel, which do you think is the most reliable?

7. Non-Governmental Organizations are private entities with an interest in a specific issue. Do you think that these NGOs are RELIABLE or UNRELIABLE as a source for monitoring Human Rights issues in Israel? TOTALS 9%Very RELIABLE 52%43%Somewhat RELIABLE 18%Somewhat UNRELIABLE 34%16%Very UNRELIABLE 14%Don’t Know / Refuse

8. Do you think that these NGOs are RELIABLE or UNRELIABLE as a source for monitoring Human Rights issues in Israel? Difference of Men and Women – RELIABLE: Men = 46% vs. Women = 58% – UNRELIABLE: Men = 39% vs. Women = 30% Difference based on education – RELIABLE: ELEM = 28% vs. BA = 65% vs. MA/PHD = 58% – UNRELIABLE: ELEM = 62% vs. BA = 27% vs. MA/PHD = 37% By 2006 vote: RELIABLE – 84% Meretz – 72% Pensioners – 65% Labor, Yisrael Beiteinu – 53% UTJ – 51% Kadima – 49% NRP – 45% Likud – 34% Shas

9. Do you think that the State of Israel is BETTER or WORSE than other Middle Eastern countries at protecting its citizens’ and residents’ Human Rights?

10. Israel is BETTER than other Middle Eastern Countries By education – ELEM = 67% vs. BA = 88% vs. MA/PHD = 91% By religious observance – Secular = 84% vs. Trad. = 81% vs. Rel. = 90% vs. Haredi = 78% 89% of soldiers By 2006 vote – 94% of Meretz, 90% of Kadima & Labor, 87% of NRP, 85% of Likud & Shas, 80% of Yisrael Beiteinu, 68% of Pensioners, 63% of UTJ

11. Do you think that the State of Israel is BETTER or WORSE than other Western Democracies at protecting its citizens’ and residents’ Human Rights?

12. BETTER or WORSE than other Western Democracies - AGE

13. BETTER or WORSE than other Western Democracies - RELIGION

14. Israel Protecting Human Rights as Compared to Middle East and Western Countries

15. On a scale of 1-10, with 1 being “don’t believe at all” and 10 being “very much believe,” how much do you believe the reports put out by organizations like Amnesty International, Machsom Watch and B’Tselem? 31%1 – 4 47%5 - 7 22%8 - 10 17% Answered 1, Only 3% Answered 10

16. Sometimes Human Rights NGOs publish reports highlighting Israel’s Human Rights violations. These are covered in the international media. Some people say it helps Israel’s image because it shows that Israel is an open democratic society constantly striving to correct injustices. Others say it damages Israel’s image because it shows claims that Israel violates people’s Human Rights. In your view, does publicizing Israel’s alleged human rights violations HELP or HURT Israel’s image abroad. 18% It HELPS Israel’s image abroad 68% It HURTS Israel’s image abroad 5% No effect 9% Don’t know / refuse

17. Do you think that Human Rights NGOs are equally concerned with Israelis and Palestinians, or do they favor one over the other?

18. The European Union provides tens of millions of dollars to Israeli and Palestinian NGOs that pursue a political agenda related to the conflict. This includes paying for large newspaper adverts, organizing demonstrations and initiating law suits. Would you SUPPORT or OPPOSE a legal requirement that activities by such NGOs include a clear public statement on the source of this funding?

19. SUPPORT for Legal Requirement for Source of Funding of NGOs by 2006 Vote 82% of Meretz 80% of Pensioners 78% of Labor 74% of NRP/National Union 68% of Kadima 64% of Yisrael Beiteinu 63% of UTJ 57% of Likud 50% of Shas

20. SUPPORT or OPPOSE publicizing funding source - EDUCATION

21. The European Union provides tens of millions of dollars to Israeli and Palestinian NGOs that pursue a political agenda related to the conflict. This includes paying for large newspaper adverts, organizing demonstrations and initiating law suits. Would you SUPPORT or OPPOSE Knesset legislation that would prohibit Israeli organizations from accepting funding from a foreign government for political activities?

22. In 2007, Amnesty International released more reports condemning Israel than it did condemning either the Palestinian Authority, or Hamas, or Syria, or Saudi Arabia, or Libya, or Lebanon, or Hezbollah or Iraq. Having heard this fact, do you think that Amnesty International is RELIABLE or UNRELIABLE as a source for monitoring Human Rights issues in Israel?

23. In 2001 the UN sponsored the Durban Conference which brought together 4,000 participants from 1,500 NGOs from all over the world. One of the most important outcomes of that conference was a declaration published that referred to Israel as an “apartheid and racist state” and called for an economic boycott. As a result do you think …….. 64% Human Rights NGOs by their nature are biased against Israel 23% There is some truth in their declaration that Israel is an apartheid and racist state 13% Don’t Know / Refuse

24. The US State Department and World Bank often utilize reports of NGOs on Israeli-Palestinian issues to formulate policy and understand the situation on the ground better. Do you think that …… 32% It is acceptable for the US State Department and World Bank to utilize reports from Human Rights NGOs operating in Israel 44% The US State Department and World Bank should use their own reports exclusively 24% Don’t know /Refuse

25. Are you more likely to believe a human rights NGO regarding a human rights violation, or are you more likely to believe the claims of the IDF or another official state authority?

26. For More Information NGO Monitor Prof. Gerald Steinberg 1 Ben Maimon Street Jerusalem Tel: 02-561-9112 Email: mail@ngo-monitor.orgmail@ngo-monitor.org www.ngo-monitor.org KEEVOON Research Mitchell Barak 2 Beitar Street Jerusalem Tel: 02-672-0010 Email: info@keevoon.cominfo@keevoon.com www.keevoon.com