Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Characterizing Storm Water Runoff from Natural Gas Well Sites in North-Central Texas Paul F. Hudak and David J. Wachal Department of Geography University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Characterizing Storm Water Runoff from Natural Gas Well Sites in North-Central Texas Paul F. Hudak and David J. Wachal Department of Geography University."— Presentation transcript:

1 Characterizing Storm Water Runoff from Natural Gas Well Sites in North-Central Texas Paul F. Hudak and David J. Wachal Department of Geography University of North Texas

2 Introduction *Annually, 30,000+ natural gas wells drilled in U.S. *Potentially adverse to surface water quality (sediment, hydrocarbons, metals) *However, few studies have been conducted

3

4 Introduction (continued) *The objective of this proposal is to characterize storm water runoff from natural gas well sites in north-central Texas

5

6 Background *Adverse effects of “typical” construction activity well known - Regulated by National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), requiring erosion control, storm water pollution prevention plans, site monitoring

7 Background (continued) *Adverse effects of gas well construction not well known - Oil and gas field operations exempt from federal NPDES permitting requirements

8 Methods *Collect storm water runoff from 3 natural gas well sites, 2 undisturbed reference sites in southwest Denton County - Grand Prairie, montmorillonitic clays - Average annual rainfall 99 cm, thunderstorms common *ISCO flow-interval samplers: Up to 18 discrete 1000 ml samples *40 runoff events (total) at gas well sites, 10 at reference sites, over a two-year period

9

10

11 Methods (continued) *Collect during rain events *Metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, sediment - Nonparametric statistics to compare differences between gas well, reference sites - Estimate annual sediment yields

12

13 ParameterMethodDetection Limit AlkalinitySM 2320 B1.0 mg l -1 CalciumEPA 200.80.5 mg l -1 ChlorideSM 4500 Cl (D)0.15-10.0 a mg l -1 ConductivitySWQMP b 10 µS m -1 HardnessSM 2340 C1.0 mg l -1 pHSWQMP b NA TDSSWQMP b 10.0 mg l -1 TSSSM 2540 D4.0 mg l -1 TurbiditySWQMP b NA Arsenic (As)EPA 200.80.01 mg l -1 Cadmium (Cd)EPA 200.80.001 mg l -1 Chromium (Cr)EPA 200.80.01 mg l -1 Copper (Cu)EPA 200.80.01 mg l -1 Iron (Fe)EPA 200.80.05 mg l -1 Lead (Pb)EPA 200.80.001 mg l -1 Manganese (Mn)EPA 200.80.01 mg l -1 Nickel (Ni)EPA 200.80.01 mg l -1 Zinc (Zn)EPA 200.80.05 mg l -1 TPHTCEQ 1005.35.0 mg l -1 BTEXEPA 2081 B1.0 µg l -1c ; 2.0 µg l -1d a based on turbidity of sample; b Surface Water Quality Monitoring Procedures Manual (TCEQ, 1997) using Hydrolab, Y.S.I., or other similar meter; c for each Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, o-Xylene; d for each m-Xylene, p-Xylene Methods (continued) Analytical Methods and Detection Limits

14 Parameter a n b /n c p-valueRatio d Alkalinity40/10<0.00016.9 Chloride40/100.00581.7 Conductivity40/10<0.04831.2 Hardness40/10<0.00013.2 pH40/10<0.00011.2 TDS40/100.05611.2 TSS39/8<0.0001157.1 Turbidity37/9<0.000142.5 Calcium36/8<0.00018.0 Iron36/8<0.000113.5 Manganese36/8<0.000128.9 Nickel36/80.00273.2 a Parameters containing more than 50% of storm event EMCs below detection limit (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb) were not analyzed; b no. of gas well site samples; c no. of reference site samples; d ratio of median EMCs for reference and gas well sites. Example Statistical Procedure (Preliminary Results): Wilcoxon Rank-Sum and Ratio of Median EMCs

15 Methods (continued) *Also compare observations to drinking water standards and aquatic life criteria (the level of a pollutant or other measurable parameter that allows for protection of aquatic life)

16

17 Conclusion and Expected Benefits *Study will show which pollutants are higher at gas drilling sites compared to other construction sites *Helps inform monitoring strategies *Is beneficial to academic community, drillers, and regulatory agencies

18 Conclusion and Expected Benefits (continued) *If pollutant levels are similar to, or higher than, other construction sites, this may signal a need for also regulating gas well sites *Future work could focus on best management practices for reducing pollutants from gas well sites similar to construction sites (regulated under NPDES)


Download ppt "Characterizing Storm Water Runoff from Natural Gas Well Sites in North-Central Texas Paul F. Hudak and David J. Wachal Department of Geography University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google