1. Tulsa Bike Share July 21 st, 2015 Vision Presentation

2. Bike Share Operating Experience

3. Advisory Committee

4. Movable/modular Permanently mounted Smart lock bikes Minneapolis Nice Ride Hamilton’s Social Bicycles Miami’s DecoBike Evolution of Available Technologies

5. Phasing Map with GO Plan draft networks

6. Local residents looking to fulfill trips too long to walk & not convenient to drive/take transit for various reasons Business District commuters needing to do lunch hour errands College students needing a ride within or beyond campus Visitors and tourists accessing Tulsa’s various destinations Likely Tulsa User Profiles

7. Vision Goals New Balance Hubway in Boston Health - Improved individual and community health thru active transportation “ But when researchers factored in the health benefits derived from physical activity, they estimated that 12.28 deaths could be avoided every year.” Governing Economic development - green jobs, improved access to businesses and helping to “brand” the city “ In Washington, DC, more than eight out of ten said they were more likely to visit a business, shop or restaurant with easy access to a bike-sharing dock.” Governing

8. Vision Goals Quality of Life – Improves the quality of life for Tulsans “ … last year’s United States Conference of Mayors concluded: "communities that have invested in pedestrian and bicycle projects have benefited from improved quality of life, healthier population, greater local real-estate values, more local travel choices, and reduced air pollution.“ The Economist Attracting and retaining workforce – Early adopters are young professionals “Populations aged 25 – 34 years old represent the largest group of bike share users.” Transportation and Connectivity - Supplements the transit system “Bike share can provide an opportunity to close gaps within a transit system and to provide the “last mile” connection between people’s homes and places of work (or school) and vice versa.”

9. Who will own, administer, and operate the system? Zotwheels, U.C. at Irvine Denver B-Cycle What are the pros & cons of different ownership options? Business Models

10. 24 stations and 216 bikes, implemented in 2 phases Owned/operated by a nonprofit (process starting now, implementation within 18-24 months) Phase 1 and 2 of the system is expected to cost $3.2 - $3.8 million over five years Projected revenue is $93,000 (year 1) to $270,000 (year 5) per year Revenues will provide 40-50% of the operating fees, but will need to be defrayed by $2.3 – $2.9 million in gap funding over the five-year period System Summary

11. Cost and Funding Options  More typical split is roughly 3:1 – 2:1 public/private dollars

12. Presentations to Stakeholders Stakeholders can be funders/supporters: Tulsa Hub, Tulsa Health Dept., ONEOK, Williams Companies, Warren Foundation, Zarrow Foundation, Lobeck Taylor Foundation, Tulsa City- County Library, United Way, CommunityCare, etc. Crossover from Advisory Committee

13. Thank you! Jennifer Haddaway, Transportation Resource Center Coordinator jhaddaway@incog.org