1. 1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for {JPSS Algorithm} Presented by Date

2. Outline Algorithm Cal/Val Team Members Product Requirements Evaluation of algorithm performance to specification requirements – Evaluation of the effect of required algorithm inputs – Quality flag analysis/validation – Error Budget Documentation Identification of Processing Environment Users & User Feedback Conclusion Path Forward 2

3. NameOrganizationMajor Task {JPSS Algorithm} Cal/Val Team (1 slide) 3 Algorithm Cal/Val Team Members

4. Requirements (1 slide) Product Requirements from JPSS L1RD 4 AttributeThresholdObjective Geographic coverage Vertical Coverage Vertical Cell Size Horizontal Cell Size Mapping Uncertainty Measurement Range Measurement Accuracy Measurement Precision Measurement Uncertainty

5. Data Product Maturity Definition Validated Stage 1: Using a limited set of samples, the algorithm output is shown to meet the threshold performance attributes identified in the JPSS Level 1 Requirements Supplement with the exception of the S-NPP Performance Exclusions 5

6. Evaluation of algorithm performance to specification requirements (3-5 slides) Findings/Issues from Provisional Review Improvements since Provisional – Algorithm Improvements – LUT / PCT updates Cal/Val Activities for evaluating algorithm performance: – Test / ground truth data sets – Validation strategy / method – Validation results 6

7. Evaluation of the effect of required algorithm inputs (2-5 slides) Required Algorithm Inputs – Primary Sensor Data – Ancillary Data – Upstream algorithms – LUTs / PCTs Evaluation of the effect of required algorithm inputs – Study / test cases – Results 7

8. Quality flag analysis/validation (2-5 slides) Defined Quality Flags – Variable – Description – Value Quality flag analysis/validation – Test / example / ground truth data sets – Analysis/validation results – Analysis/validation plan for next validated stages 8

9. Error Budget (1 slide) Compare analysis/validation results against requirements, present as a table. Error budget limitations should be explained. Describe prospects for overcoming error budget limitations with future improvement of the algorithm, test data, and error analysis methodology. 9 Attribute Analyzed L1RD Threshold Analysis/Validation Result Error Summary

10. Documentation (1 slide) The following documents will be updated and provided to the EDR Review Board before AERB approval: – Current or updated ATBD – Current or updated OAD – README file for CLASS – Product User’s Guide (Recommended) 10

11. Identification of Processing Environment (1 slide) IDPS or NDE build (version) number and effective date Algorithm version Version of LUTs used Version of PCTs used Description of environment used to achieve validated stage 1 11

12. Users & User Feedback (1-2 slide) User list Feedback from users Downstream product list Reports from downstream product teams on the dependencies and impacts 12

13. Conclusion (1 slide) Cal/Val results summary: – Team recommends algorithm validated stage 1 maturity Caveats 13

14. Path Forward (1-2 slide) Planned further improvements Planned Cal/Val activities / milestones 14