Download presentation
1
Chapter 10: Elections and Campaigns
2
Types of elections Primary / Caucus General Designed to choose the parties nominee Example: Romney, Paul, Huntsman, Gingrich, Santorum competing to be Republican nominee for 2012 Types: Closed: must declare in advance that you are a member of the party to take part in this election About 40 states (why? ) Open: on primary election day you pick which parties primary you will vote on 8 states Blanket: can vote in primaries for both parties Washington & Alaska Designed to pick the candidate who will actually hold office Example: Obama vs. Romney Hon .Clay Henry III of Lajitas , Texas
3
Types of Elections Primary / Caucus
How to get on the ballot in NJ (each state is different) It is estimated to cost about $50 million to run a successful primary/caucus campaign (Romney spent $110 million) In the past 3 decades, in almost every case, the candidate who raised the most money during this stage in the process won their party’s nomination What is a Caucus? 19 states Why do most states hold primaries? C’s are too time consuming!!!! About 10% turnout
4
Primaries / Caucuses So where does that $ go? Organization
Fundraisers , Accountants , Press secretary , Scheduler , Speech writers , TV and internet advertising specialist , Pollsters , Direct mailing company & Social media specialists Helps to win Iowa Caucus and N. H. Primary only 2 candidates in the past 10 elections have lost both and gone on to win their party’s nomination G. W. Bush in 2000 Clinton in 1992 So what do you have to do to win? Read: the excerpt from Stormy Weather What can help a candidate gain momentum? How long does the “invisible primary” last? Iowa doesn’t award delegates until weeks after the caucuses, so why are the Iowa caucuses still seen as important? Why does New Hampshire remain an indicator of who will win the eventual nomination?
5
Primaries / Caucuses Need to motivate voters to turn out for you
Primary turnout low About 20% This results in candidates trying to appeal to the base of their party while also looking ahead to general election Republicans: need to appear conservative Democrats: need to appear liberal During the general election candidates generally return to more moderate stances, must remember what you say during primary/ caucus season will be used by your opponent Can result in “Clothespin voting”
6
Presidential Primaries / Caucuses
When voting in a P/C you are actually selecting delegates who will attend the party’s National Convention to demonstrate support for that candidate. Much like the electoral college The Party’s decide the rules, they are not in the Constitution or state law, the party’s can change the rules prior to an election. Democrats award delegates proportionally in all states Republicans allow the state to decide if they want a winner take all system or a proportional system NJ = winner take all
7
Delegates Democrats Republican
Total number of delegates: 4,339 Pledged: 3,537 Unpledged: 802 PLEDGED "PLEO" (Party Leaders and Elected Officials) DELEGATES Based on % of democratic vote in that state in the past 3 presidential elections UNPLEDGED "PLEO" DELEGATES (Super delegates occurred after 1980) Primarily Democratic Members of Congress, Governors, and "distinguished party leaders." 802 total. This equals 15% of pledged delegates Total Number of Delegates: 2,066 Pledged: 1,907 Unpledged: 159 Each state gets 6 delegates plus 3 for each member in the House BONUS DELEGATES Each state can earn additional delegates by meeting one or more of the following requirements: the state cast a majority of its votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the previous presidential election the state elected Republicans to the U.S. House or Senate, selected a Republican Governor or state legislative majorities and / or the state holds its presidential primary election after March 15th (this is to discourage states from holding early primaries).
8
General Presidential vs. General Congressional Campaigns
More voters participate Typically about VEP 60% turnout since 1964 More party turnover Past 20 elections Republicans 9 times Democrats 11 times Less voter turn-out, especially during midterm elections (non-presidential election years 2002,2006, ) Typically about 36% turnout since 1964 Historically less party turnover (recent exceptions include 2006 and 2010) Why less turnover?!? Incumbency advantage More direct connection to the voter (service to constituents) Separate themselves from the “mess in Washington” Sophomore surge: can use perks of office to get elected How to get on the ballot for the general election in NJ
9
Presidential Elections
Who does the public prefer? Most candidates have experience in multiple areas listed below
10
Presidential Election
Theme? A simple ,appealing idea that can be repeated over and over and over and over and over (you get it) Obama: Forward Romney: We can’t afford 4 more years If you are an incumbent, you will invariably have to defend your record Tone? Positive? Build me up Negative? Knock them down Overall theme and campaign: How Barack Obama Won in Lanahan
11
Negative Campaigning Jefferson and Adams Daisy Willy Horton From Going Dirty in Lanahan: Negative Campaigning
12
Timing? Start too early and you may go broke, too late and you may not build up enough momentum or name recognition Targets? Who are the undecided in this election? How will you sway them? Use precise targeting / “micro-targeting” New demographics(see next slide)
13
Targets: Demographics
Need to focus on these voters and mobilize them!!!! What groups are Republicans going to have to reach out to to win the next presidential election ? How can the Republicans appeal to women and Latinos without changing their core beliefs?
14
Presidential Elections
What types of issues will the candidate focus on? Position: rival parties take different stances Taxation: Obama : increase taxes on wealthy to help pay down debt Romney: decrease tax rate for all to help struggling economy Valence: how closely a party/candidate is connected with a concept Nixon: associated with a tough stance on crime Reagan: more associated with a strong economy
15
Presidential Elections
Who is going to be your Vice President? Need to pick someone who will appeal to a part of the party you may not appeal to “balance the ticket” Youth / Experience Regional Moderate / Conservative or Liberal Unify party after bitter primary Classic examples Kennedy and Johnson Reagan / G.H.W. Bush How does Obama /Biden reflect this? How does Romney / Ryan reflect this? Classic Anomaly: Clinton / Gore
16
Presidential Elections
How will you “advertise” your candidate? TV Debates Direct Mail Internet
17
General Election and the Electoral College
Electoral College: 538 electors in total ( ) , need 270 Meet on the first Monday after the 2nd Wednesday in December votes sent to Congress counted during a joint session How are electors chosen? What happens if there is a tie? (1825) election of 1800: Jefferson v. Adams 12th amendment: Electors vote on separate ballot for pres and VP to avoid rivals holding office together How the 2012 election broke down, various maps
18
Electoral College Pros Cons Allows for both people and states to be represented : Federalism “Extended Republic” Need to appeal to a variety of voters, not just one faction or region Doesn’t always reflect the will of the people Can have faithless electors Doesn’t reflect the idea of 1 person, 1 vote Wyoming has one "elector" for every 177,556 people and Texas has one "elector" for about every 715,499.
20
Campaign Spending Reading:
Summarize the rules governing campaign finance FECA BCRA / McCain Feingold Act Public Funding Buckley v. Valeo What was Buckley’s argument? What did the Supreme Court rule? How does this currently impact elections?
21
Campaign Finance “There are two things that are important in politics.
The first is money and I can’t remember what the second one is.” —Ohio political boss and U.S. Senator Mark Hanna, 1895 Hard Money vs. Soft money: Hard money : money given directly to a candidate’s campaign Soft Money: money used to promotes issues Dark money: contributions that don’t have to be disclosed (501c4s)
22
PACs and Super PACs Political Action Committees
Created in 1940s by the CIO as a way to contribute to FDR’s campaign Organizations that have developed with the sole purpose of helping a candidate to get (re)elected to office Individuals and organizations can contribute up to $5,000 annually to a PAC PACs can legally contribute only $5,000 to a candidate committee per election (primary, general or special). They can also give up to $15,000 annually to any national party committee, and $5,000 annually to any other PAC. However, there is no limit to how much PACs can spend on advertising in support of candidates or in promotion of their agendas or beliefs. PACs must register with and file detailed financial reports of monies raised and spent to the Federal Election Commission.
23
PACs and Super PACs separate segregated funds (SSFs)
Traditional PACs include two distinct types of political committees registered with the FEC: separate segregated funds (SSFs) political committees established by corporations, labor unions, membership organizations or trade associations that can only solicit contributions from individuals associated with the sponsoring organization Microsoft PAC No connected committees not sponsored by or connected to any of the listed organizations and are free to solicit contributions from the general public, subject to campaign contribution limits. National Rifle Association
24
PACs and Super PACs Super PACs
Created as a result of 3 Court Decisions In January 2010, the Supreme Court dealt a major blow to McCain-Feingold (BCRA). Ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the court said that the government cannot prevent corporations and unions from spending unlimited money to support or criticize specific candidates. Drawing on this decision in March 2010, a federal appeals court ruled in SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission that political committees making independent expenditures—that is, spending not coordinated with or directed by a candidate’s campaign—could accept donations of unlimited size.
25
PACs and Super PACs Super PACs may not contribute directly to candidate’s campaign or to political parties but instead spend money independent of a political campaign to influence the result. In addition, they can raise funds from corporations, unions and other groups, and from individuals, without legal limits. According to FEC rules, Super PACs are not allowed to cooperate, consult, or act in concert with a candidate or their agents or a political party or its agents. They can , however, publically declare support for one candidate or another. List of current Super PACs
26
Presidential Campaign Spending
27
Review Basics Can do Can’t do PACs (1940s) NRA
Hard money Only purpose is to get a candidate elected Donate directly to a candidate(s) Donate directly to a campaign. Must disclose donors Endorse a candidate Accept more than $5,000 in individual donations , can’t donate more than $5,000 to an individual candidate Super PACs (2010) Restore our Future Soft Money Designed to promote a candidate and/or specific issues during an election Accept unlimited donations from individuals and /or labor unions and corps., endorse a specific candidate , support issues, must disclose donors Donate to or work with an individual candidate or a political party 527s Emily’s List Citizens United Soft money Only purpose is to promote issues during an election, turning into Super-PACs Accept unlimited donations from individuals and corporations (as a result of citizens), support an issue , must disclose donors actually support a candidate : basically can’t say “vote for x” donate to a candidate 501 (c) (4) s Crossroads gps , NAACP Soft money / Dark Money Social welfare organization that can use some of its funds to promote issues Accept unlimited donations from individuals and corporations , support an issue , don’t need to disclose donors spend more than 50% of organizations wealth on “educating” people on issues during a campaign Review
28
Rules governing campaign finance
FECA (1972): Imposed contribution limits to a candidates campaign Limited campaign expenditures Need to disclose donor information Created public financing Created Federal Election Commission
29
Buckley v. Valeo: testing constitutionality of FECA
Unconstitutional Limits on direct contributions to candidates Optional public financing Disclosing contributions Creation of FEC Limits on candidates expenditures (spending) Except if you accept public funding
30
BRCA / McCain –Feingold (2002)
Labor Unions and corporations can’t fund ads, limits on attack ads prior to elections Limits on how much $ could be given to PACs and how much PACs could give to candidates and political parties
31
Citizens United and the 2012 Election: A Case Study
Basic information about Citizens United What changes did Citizens United make to campaign finance regulation? Do you agree or disagree with this decision? Why? Impact of Citizens on 2012 election Write a 1 paragraph reaction to this article.
32
Citizens United Thoughts on Citizens ruling? 5-4 ruling by SCOTUS
Corporations and Labor Unions are allowed to give unlimited monetary contributions to outside spending groups (527s, 501c4s), the ruling was based on the 1st amendment rights of these organizations (freedom of political speech) Labor Unions and Corporations can use general funds to create ads to support candidates or issues Cannot directly donate to a candidate No restrictions on when negative ads funded by outside groups can air on TV Was 30 days before a primary, 60 days before a general election Thoughts on Citizens ruling?
33
Frontline: Big Sky, Big Money
Day 1: How much money has been spent on ads in the Senate race in Montana? What % has come from outside groups? Do you think that this statistic matters?( be specific) How do 501 c4s and Super PACs differ? Why may an individual / corporation / labor union rather contribute to a 501 c4? Define “magic words”, give a few examples. link to video
34
Big Sky, Big Money Day 2: Jim Bopp, Jr. contends that the anonymity that 501c4s provide donors is beneficial to the political process. Do you agree or disagree? Why? In the case of Montana v. WTP: What are the issues? How does the Montana Supreme Court rule? Ultimately how does SCOTUS rule? After viewing the film answer the following question in 5-8 sentences citing specific examples from the film Does having less restrictions on 501c4s impede or enhance our electoral process?
35
Questions to consider when reflecting on campaign finance regulations
Should there be any limits on what candidates and political parties can spend during a campaign (hard money)? Should there be any limits on what independent (outside ) expenditure groups (501c4s, 527s, Super PACs) can spend (soft money) ? Citizens United declared that corporations and labor unions have the same rights to political free speech as individuals. Do you agree? Can you just allow corporations or labor unions to have political personhood? Should there be any media restrictions on the number and/or frequency of ads any entity can produce? Should 501c4s have to disclose donors? Should 527s, 501c4s, and Super PACS be able to coordinate with candidates? Do these groups actually allow for more groups (factions) to be represented? (Would Madison approve?) Do you think these groups may allow for 3rd party candidates to be viable candidates for office?
36
Campaign Finance: Public Funding
The Federal Election Commission began public funding in 1976. Eligible Presidential candidates use federal funds in their primary and general election campaigns, and the major parties used public funds to pay for their nominating conventions. Candidates are eligible to get $20 mil from the government and can spend up to $50,000 of their own $, the total limit for 2012 was $91.5 million A candidate could raise $70 million and spend that as well. Where does the $ come from? The U.S. Treasury makes the actual payments from the Presidential Election Campaign Fund. This fund consists of dollars voluntarily checked off by taxpayers on their federal income tax returns. To be eligible the candidate: Must be a member of a political party Must show broad based support by raising at least $5,000 in at least 20 states (100,000)
37
Congressional Elections
All 435 House seats are up for election every 2 years (even numbered years) 1/3 of the 100 Senate seats are up for election every 2 years (even numbered years) This is to avoid total turnover of the Senate Mature, experienced body to temper the whims of the House Federalism Republic, not a democracy
38
House Elections It is up to Congress to decide how many representatives each state will have Must have at least 1 House was originally set at 65 members, last set at 435 in 1911 and decided to keep that as the fixed number States may have seats added or subtracted every 10 years based on the results of the census Since the 1950s states in the Sun belt have been adding seats, states in the rust belt have lost seats When states add or subtract seats they have to redraw their districts. Malapportionament: unequal representation in districts (more on this later Gerrymandering: drawing district lines to benefit one political party
40
When creating a district these are the things that you must do!!!
Population Equality - Each election district must have the same number of constituents. This generally ranges between 640, ,000 people. At the federal level, courts tend to enforce the population equality standard very strictly. • Contiguity - Each district must be one continuous shape. No "land islands" are allowed. U.S. courts always enforce the principle of contiguity. • Compactness - Generally speaking, districts need to be drawn in compact shapes. Extremely jagged edges and skinny extensions are features that are the hallmarks of gerrymandered districts. Because compactness is a traditional standard about which there is no generally accepted method of measurement, the courts in most states do not usually enforce the compactness principle in practice.
41
Gerrymandering Term first used in 1812 to reflect the redrawing of districts in Massachusetts overseen by then Gov. Elbridge Gerry They were drawn to favor the Democratic-Republican Party Gerry + Salamander = gerrymander
42
Modern Examples
43
Gerrymandering Packing: when you try to fill a district with as many members of the same party as possible may be done by 1 political party that controls the process, or by bipartisan commissions to keep incumbency advantages Cracking: when you try to break the influence of one party or minority group in an area by dividing that area between different districts Done when 1 political party wants to maintain control
45
What are kidnapping and hijacking?
46
Hijacking: If there's an incumbent you don't like, you can make their re-election difficult by putting them in a district with another incumbent of the same party to contend with. You can force a costly primary battle, weakening your likely opponent before general election. Kidnapping: Moving an incumbents house into another district where they have little name recognition, making it much more difficult for them to win (taking them from their base)
47
Cracking a very liberal voting area in Ohio
Packing districts to ensure incumbency advantage Land island, not allowed!!!! Packing African Americans into 1 district
48
Getting elected to Congress
Most important factors in getting a candidate elected Party, candidate characteristics, incumbency advantage and issues Candidate Characteristics: Race, ethnicity, religion, gender, geography, and social background all matter In general voters prefer candidates that are closer to themselves in these categories Incumbency advantage : 90% of incumbents in the House have sought re-election and won!!!!!!!!! 2012: 23 incumbents lost house seats Remember 435 were up for election
49
% of Representatives defeated while seeking re-election
50
% of candidates not seeking re-election
51
Baker v. Carr and other S.C. cases impacting redistricting
Malapportionment (unequal population in districts) violates the Equal protection clause of the 14th amendment All citizens must be treated equally and without bias Federal courts can intervene in the redistricting process, after reapportionment if needed One person , One Vote (districts need to make pop, in districts as close to equal as possible) This ruling narrowly applied to state legislatures due to the nature of the case Challenging state assembly districts in Tennessee Wesbury v. Sanders: One Man , one vote applies to House districts, as well as state legislatures Challenged the malapportionment of Georgia’s house districts Causes a whole bunch of redistricting!!!!!
52
Why do we need redistricting? Hypothetical situation
867,000 642,000 336,000 644,000 641,000 796,000 769,000 642,000 2001 2010
53
Have fun packing, cracking, kidnapping, hijacking!!!!!!!!
Re-districting Game Have fun packing, cracking, kidnapping, hijacking!!!!!!!!
54
Review http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6avsQKngNk
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.