Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCory Fletcher Modified over 9 years ago
1
Counting Bikes in Madison, WI 2013 Fall Count Procedure Madison, WI Sept 4 2013
2
What is NBPD? An on-going effort by private consultants with support from ITE Annual national bicycle and pedestrian count and survey effort Fulfills need for in-depth analysis of why people bike and walk Objectives – Consistent data collection – Open access data – Shared research
3
3 Lack of consistent data Non-motorized modes lack funding Minimal national data sharing Analysis for other modes are based on marginal data yet receive substantive funding Need for NBPD
4
4 NBPD Accomplishments Over 75 organizations and agencies have sent data Over 600 count locations Extrapolation figures Related projects: Caltrans Seamless Travel Publicly available support documents including training presentations and count/survey forms www.bikepeddocumenation.org
5
Why Count? Evaluate need for new trails and trail upgrades Evaluate community demand Explain trail value to community, elected officials, grant agencies Justify resource allocation Forecast demand Support grant applications
6
Quick Overview of Counting Process Preparation for Counts Select count days, times, locations Determine manual or automatic counters, or both Visit locations to understand unusual traffic patterns Determine how many counters you will need to hire Hire and train your counters
7
After Counting Period Review forms Re-count locations if necessary Data entry Send data to NBPD Data analysis Plan for your next count
8
NBPD Count Dates and Times January 10 -12 May 15 -17 July 3-5 September 11-13 Recommended Times Weekday, 5-7 PM Saturday, 12 noon – 2PM Secondary Times Weekday, 7 AM to 7 PM Saturday, 7 AM to 7 PM Other days and times are ok, based on local situation. 2012 Official National Count/Survey Days
9
Selecting Count Weeks Consider: – School schedules – Daylight savings – Special events – Weather
10
Selecting Days of the Week Select one weekday and one weekend day to gather different levels Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays are not statistically significantly different
11
Selecting Time of Day Consistency is key Peak periods include: – Weekday, 10AM-Noon – Weekday, 5-7 PM – Saturday, Noon-2pm Actual local peak periods may vary considerably
12
Selecting Locations Depends on reason for collecting data – Area-wide estimation of activity – Before-after analysis – Facility use – Exposure data – Transit access mode share – Etc….
13
Count Types Screenline Intersection Count everyone who passes Count anyone who enters your intersection and note movement
14
Screenline and Intersection Counts Screenline Counts Volume on a corridor Simpler, allows counters to collect other info easily Less training needed Automatic counters can be used Intersection Counts Volume Approximate exposure Turning movements More complicated Requires more training Automatic counters can’t be used
15
Quality Control It is important to include quality control measures – Spot field checks – Review and verification of data within a day or two of collection to identify discrepancies – Use of counters who care a lot about bicycle and pedestrian issues has been shown to improve the accuracy of counts.
16
Forms Intersection form Screenline form Forms available on website
17
Data Input Name Location Date Time Period Weather
18
Data Input: Screenline Count Form 15 minute intervals Count from each direction Count by gender Count number of people on bicycle People in wheelchairs counted as pedestrians
19
Intersection Count Form Separate bicycle and pedestrian count forms Does not differentiate by gender Allows counters to collect turning movements 15-minute intervals 2-hour period can be collected on 1 sheet
20
Data Input: Intersection Count Form 15 minute intervals Note movement through intersection May use different symbols for bikes/peds Or a symbol for sidewalk riding or road walking
21
Data Input: Intersection Crossing Enter after field work Total and summarize data for after the count and for input into the national database
22
Conducting Screenline Counts
23
Screenline Count Count everyone who passes
24
Count Form
25
Data Input Name Location Date Time Period Weather
26
Data Input By gender 15 minute intervals People on Bicycles Pedestrians - including wheelchairs Others - skateboarders & rollerbladers Anybody passing the screenline (from both directions)
27
Data Input 49 612
28
Returning Count Forms Count forms collected by the sponsoring agency Enter data in spreadsheet available at: www.bikepeddocumentation.org www.bikepeddocumentation.org – NBPD updated the spreadsheets for the 2009 count effort Send data sheets to data@bikepeddocumentation.org
29
Subjects
30
How do you count this?
31
5!
32
How do you count this?
33
2!
34
How do you count this?
35
4!
36
How do you count this?
37
Other!
38
By the park.
39
How do you count this?
40
0!
41
How do you count this?
42
2! How do you count this?
44
2
45
Trail Counts with Automatic Counters The corner of Nørrebrogade and Søtorvet, in Copenhagen sees over 36,000 bicycles per day!
46
Count Technologies Passive InfraredDetects change in thermal contrast Active InfraredDetects obstruction in beam Video ImagingAnalyzes pixel changes or Data is played by and analyzed by a person In-Pavement Magnetic Loop Sense change in magnetic field as metal passes over Slab SensorDetects change in pressure to measure footsteps
47
Passive Infrared Little maintenance Easy to move Can detect travel in both directions 70-95% accuracy Can not distinguish between bicycles and pedestrians Grouping poses problem Cost estimate: $1,000-$3,000 each
48
Active Infrared Little maintenance Easy to move Can distinguish between bicycles and pedestrians 90-95% accurate Can not detect travel direction Requires equipment on both sides of path Grouping poses problem Cost estimate: $700-$1,000 each
49
Video Imaging Little maintenance Can record travel in both directions Can distinguish between bicycles and pedestrians Difficult to move Requires review Cost estimate: Varies on hours and number of locations
50
In-Pavement Loop Detection Little maintenance Grouping does not cause significant problem Can detect travel in both directions 95% accurate Difficult to move More expensive Cost estimate: $1,800-$3,000 each
51
Acoustic Slab Cost estimate: $1,000-$3,000 each Only detects pedestrians Difficult to move More expensive Little maintenance Grouping does not cause significant problem Can detect travel in both directions 95% accurate
52
Working with the equipment Installation & Mounting – Narrow area – Clear view of path – Avoid sun soaked trees Data downloads Issues Rains and Flooding Vandalism
53
Where to put your counter Historic (manual) count location Trail head approach › Major access point › Near transit › High use areas Areas of planned improvement High conflict areas Stakeholder recommendations
54
What the data will tell you Average Activity by Hour
55
What the data will tell you
57
Activity by Month
58
Why Use Automatic Counters? Consistent data rather than a snap shot › Weather › Seasonal variations in use › Events All influence manual counts More cost effective than coordinating volunteers More in-depth data than manual counts
59
Day of Count Be available to Abby via text, phone and social media Bring a hat Bring some water Bring extra pens or pencils Wear comfortable shoes Be ready to count!
60
Questions? Thank you! Ann Freiwald velocity1963@gmail.com www.bikepeddocumentation.org
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.