1. The person or persons who have associated work with this document (the "Dedicator" or "Certifier") hereby either (a) certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, the work of authorship identified is in the public domain of the country from which the work is published, or (b) hereby dedicates whatever copyright the dedicators holds in the work of authorship identified below (the "Work") to the public domain. A certifier, moreover, dedicates any copyright interest he may have in the associated work, and for these purposes, is described as a "dedicator" below. A certifier has taken reasonable steps to verify the copyright status of this work. Certifier recognizes that his good faith efforts may not shield him from liability if in fact the work certified is not in the public domain. Dedicator makes this dedication for the benefit of the public at large and to the detriment of the Dedicator's heirs and successors. Dedicator intends this dedication to be an overt act of relinquishment in perpetuity of all present and future rights under copyright law, whether vested or contingent, in the Work. Dedicator understands that such relinquishment of all rights includes the relinquishment of all rights to enforce (by lawsuit or otherwise) those copyrights in the Work. Dedicator recognizes that, once placed in the public domain, the Work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, used, modified, built upon, or otherwise exploited by anyone for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial, and in any way, including by methods that have not yet been invented or conceived.

2. Creating a User-Centered Culture of Assessment Stella Bentley and Bill Myers University of Kansas EDUCAUSE Southwest Regional Conference 2005

3. Dilbert Cartoon Problem: Bicycle seats are hard. They hurt. Analysis: There must be something wrong with your pants Solution: Dorky pants. Scott Adams, 7/18/94

4. North Central Association Criterion 2: Preparing for the future Appropriate data and feedback loops are available and used throughout the organization to support continuous improvement. The organization provides adequate support for its evaluation and assessment processes.

5. Why Do Assessment Benchmark current services and use data to improve efficiency and effectiveness. Measure users’ perceptions and satisfactions with services. Establish what services and resources are needed and desired. Increase dialogue with users.

6. The User-Centered Organization Quality services and user satisfaction are goals recognized and shared by all staff. User services are given emphasis through ongoing assessment, implementation of user feedback, and empowerment of staff to respond to and solve problems. There is a high level of interaction with users.

7. We may have a GAP in our Assessment Activities What we think the customer wants GAP What the customer really needs –Amos Lakos, ”Implementing a Culture of Assessment”, Conference presentation, 2004

8. Listen To Your Users!

9. Culture of Assessment Integrate assessment into the work process Build organizational framework to collect data, analyze facts, conduct research Focus on outcomes and impacts Take action on what you measure

10. Culture of Assessment Continue what you do well Concentrate on what you need to improve Experimentation is OK! – Take risks!!!

11. Effective Assessment Methods Benchmarking: identification of best practices. Quantitative methods – statistics, questionnaires, user surveys. Qualitative methods – focus groups, interviews, unobtrusive observations.

12. Last year 1,154,460 people visited our website

13. 1,444,300 people came through our doors

14. Did they find what they were looking for? Did they get the help they needed?

15. We want to know

16. Our objective...

17. Creating a culture of assessment based on evidence…

18. which leads to evidence in action.

19. Assessment council duties:

20. Foster and promote culture of assessment Provide counsel Advise libraries administration Facilitate staff development Act as clearinghouse

21. Assessment coordinator duties:

22. Act as liaison to administration Serve as initial point of contact Convene and direct assessment council Maintain currency on assessment practices and issues

23. Work with colleagues to develop, conduct, and follow through on assessment priorities to demonstrate evidence in action

24. Some guiding questions...

25. What do we need to know? Who can tell us? How can we get the information? What will it enable us to do?

26. What we have done: Developed and conducted staff development workshops on surveys & focus groups Reported on assessment activities Brought in assessment experts from other institutions Participated in LibQUAL+ Participating in ECAR Study of Students and Information Technology

27. Worked with leadership to determine assessment priorities based on primary initiatives Sought to work collaboratively with other Information Services units and other campus partners Inventory data-gathering and assessment activities already in process

28. The specific charges of the Public Interface Design Group (PID) are:

29. Review the public interface design of enterprise Library systems and work with developers to continuously improve service to users.

30. Review should include formal assessment activities that assure our services meet our users needs and expectations.

31. Usability Study #1 of the Libraries Web Site

32. Goal: Simplify the page

33. Gathered and reviewed suggestions from the group Created mockups of new home page design Decided on a page design to test for usability

35. Web Usability Questions

38. Usability Study #2 of the Libraries Web Site

42. Freshmen Survey Results

43. Report Card

44. Libraries Home Page

45. Evidence in action

46. Questions & comments