Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chapter 21 Repositioning Funds.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chapter 21 Repositioning Funds."— Presentation transcript:

1 Chapter 21 Repositioning Funds

2 Repositioning Funds An MNE is constantly striving to create shareholder value by maximizing the after-tax profitability of the firm. One dimension of this task is to reposition the profits of the firm, as legally and practically as possible, in low-tax environments. Repositioning allows an MNE to increase after-tax profits by lowering its tax liabilities with the same amount of sales. Repositioning is also useful when a MNE wishes to redeploy cash flows or funds to more value-creating activities or to minimize exposure to a potential currency collapse, or political or economic crises. Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

3 Cascade Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Cascade)
Cascade is a US-based MNE specializing in the manufacture and distribution of generic drugs worldwide. Cascade’s three foreign subsidiaries each present a unique set of concerns for management: Cascade Europe – High-tax environment, mature business (few growth opportunities), stable currency Cascade Mexico – Medium-tax environment, solid growth opportunities, volatile currency Cascade China – 50%-owned joint-venture, low-tax environment, capital restrictions, significant long-term growth potential Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

4 Cascade Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Exhibit Cascade Pharamceutical’s Subsidiaries & Their Growth Potentials Cascade Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Boston, USA) Currency: the dollar (US$) Tax rate: 35% Capital restrictions: None US Manufacturing Facility Subsidiary status: Business: mature Cascade China (Shanghai, China) Cascade Mexico (Monterrey, Mexico) Cascade Europe (Frankfurt, Germany) Greenfield Investment Acquisition Investment Joint Venture Investment Currency: the euro (€) Tax rate: 45% Capital restrictions: None Country: Currency: the peso (Ps) Tax rate: 34% Capital restrictions: None Country: Currency: the renminbi (Rmb) Tax rate: 30% Capital restrictions: Many Country: Subsidiary status: Business: mature Subsidiary status: Business: immediate growth potential Subsidiary status: Business: long-term growth potential

5 Cascade Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Cascade)
In practice Cascade’s senior management in the parent company (corporate) will first determine its strategic objectives for each subsidiary and then design for each a financial management plan for repositioning of profits, cash flows and capital. The following are repositioning objectives by subsidiary: Cascade Europe – Reposition profits from Germany to the US Cascade Mexico – Reposition (or manage) foreign exchange risks while maintaining capital for growth Cascade China – Reposition funds enough to protect against blocked funds (transfer risk), while balancing the needs of the JV partner Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

6 Cascade Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Cascade)
Funds flows between units of a domestic business are generally unimpeded, but that is not the case in a multinational business. A firm operating globally faces a variety of political, tax, foreign exchange, and liquidity considerations that limit its ability to move funds easily and without cost from one country or currency to another. These constraints are the reason multinational financial managers must plan ahead for repositioning funds within the MNE. Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

7 Cascade Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Cascade)
Political constraints: Political constraints can block the transfer of funds either overtly or covertly Overt blockage occurs when a currency becomes incontrovertible or is subject to government exchange controls that prevent its transfer at reasonable exchange rates Covert blockage occurs when dividends or other forms of fund remittances are severely limited, heavily taxed, or excessively delayed by the need for bureaucratic approval Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

8 Cascade Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Cascade)
Tax constraints: Tax constraints arise because of the complex and possibly contradictory tax structures of various national governments through whose jurisdictions funds may pass A firm does not want funds eroded by a sequence of nibbling tax collectors in every jurisdiction through which funds might flow Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

9 Cascade Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Cascade)
Transaction costs: Foreign currency transaction costs are incurred when one currency is exchanged for another These costs, in the form of fees and/or the difference between bid and ask quotations, are revenue for the banks and Fx dealers that operate the Fx markets Large or frequent transfers can have significant transaction costs (requiring that firms avoid unnecessary back-and-forth transfers) Liquidity needs: Needs in each individual location must be satisfied and good local banking relationships maintained Clearly, local needs constrain a pure-optimization approach to worldwide cash positioning Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

10 Conduits for Moving Funds
Multinational firms often unbundle their transfer of funds into separate flows for specific purposes. Unbundling allows a multinational firm to recover funds from subsidiaries without piquing host country sensitivities over large dividend drains. The following exhibit illustrates conduits separated into before-tax ad after-tax groups in the host country. Tax goals frequently are a critical determinant for many foreign subsidiary tax structures (making the before-tax, after-tax conduit distinction of importance). Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

11 Foreign Subsidiary’s Income Statement Payment to Parent Company
Exhibit Potential Conduits for Moving Funds From Subsidiary to Parent Foreign Subsidiary’s Income Statement Payment to Parent Company Sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit General & administrative expenses License fees Royalties Management fees Operating profit (EBITDA) Depreciation & amortization Earnings before interest & taxes (EBIT) Foreign exchange gains (losses) Interest expenses Earnings before tax (EBT) Corporate income tax Net income (NI) Dividends Retained earnings Payments to parent for goods or services Payments for technology, trademarks, copyrights, management or other shared services Before-Tax in the Host Country Payments of interest to parent for intra- firm debt After-Tax in the Host Country Distribution of dividends to parent

12 Transfer Pricing The pricing of goods, services, and technology transferred to a foreign subsidiary from a related company, transfer pricing, is the first and foremost method of transferring funds out of a foreign subsidiary. There are significant effects of transfer pricing policies: Fund positioning effect – Transferring funds out of a particular country can be accomplished through transfer pricing (charging higher prices on goods sold to a subsidiary in that country) Income tax effect – MNEs can influence their worldwide corporate profits by setting transfer prices to minimize taxable income in a country with a high income tax rate (and vice versa) Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

13 Transfer Pricing IRS regulations provide three methods to establish arm’s length prices (the “correct” transfer price): Comparable uncontrolled price method – Although ideal, this is difficult to apply in practice because of variations in quality, quantity, timing of sale and proprietary trademarks Resale price method – starts with the final selling price to an independent purchaser and subtracts an appropriate markup for the distribution subsidiary Cost-plus method – Sets the allowable transfer price by adding an appropriate profit markup to the seller’s full cost, where full cost is the accounting definition of direct costs plus overhead allocation Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

14 Transfer Pricing When a firm is organized with decentralized profit centers, transfer pricing between centers can disrupt evaluation of managerial performance. In the case of Cascade, transferring profit from high-tax Cascade Europe to low-tax Cascade USA changes the following for one or both companies: Import tariffs paid Measurements of Fx exposure Liquidity tests Operating efficiency Income tax payments Profitability Dividend payout ratio Internal growth rate Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

15 Transfer Pricing Although all governments have an interest in monitoring transfer pricing by MNEs, not all governments use these powers to regulate transfer prices to the detriment of MNEs. Most foreign governments realize the need of foreign investors to repatriate a reasonable profit by their own standards, even if it seems unreasonable locally. Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

16 License Fees, Royalty Fees, and Shared Services
License fees are remuneration paid to the owners of technology, patents, trade names, and copyrighted material. License fees are usually paid on a percentage of the value of the product or on the volume of production. As such they are calculated independently of the volume of sales. Royalty fees are similar compensation for the use of intellectual property. Royalty fees are, however, usually a stated percentage of sales revenue (compensation to the owner for sales volume). Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

17 License Fees, Royalty Fees, and Shared Services
These types of fees can also function as a means to reposition funds between subsidiaries and parent. These intracompany licensing and royalty fees can be further differentiated into management fees for general expertise and advice, technical assistance fees, and license fees for use of patented products or processes. Shared services charges (often referred to as distributed charges or distributed overhead) compensate the parent for costs incurred in the general management of international operations and for other corporate services provided to foreign subsidiaries by the parent. Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

18 License Fees, Royalty Fees, and Shared Services
An MNE must be careful to preserve its rights to receive funds from subsidiaries as royalties, fees, or shared services. The contracts or agreements that establish the terms and amount of payment must be structured carefully and clearly and should address: Sales price definitions Coverage Time and currency of payment Reports Monitoring costs Non-financial issues (exclusiveness and limitations) Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

19 International Dividend Remittances
Payment of dividends is the classical method by which firms transfer profit back to owners, be they individual shareholders or parent corporations. Clearly, host country tax laws influence the dividend decision. Dividends remain the most tax-inefficient method for repatriating funds because they are distributed on an after-tax basis (generating excess foreign tax credits on the dividend for the MNE). Royalty fees or license fees, on the contrary, are pre-tax and are usually only subject to a smaller (relative) withholding tax. Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

20 International Dividend Remittances
However, political risk may motivate parent firms to require foreign subsidiaries to remit all locally generated funds (not required to finance growth in sales or to support working capital needs). Clearly, foreign exchange risks (or anticipated losses for example) would lead the MNE to speed up the transfer of funds out of the country via dividends. Speeding up or slowing down payments is referred to as leads and lags. Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

21 Leads and Lags: Retiming the Transfer of Funds
Firms can reduce both operating and transaction exposure by accelerating or decelerating the timing of payments that must be made or received in foreign currencies. To lead is to pay early. To lag is to pay late. Leading and lagging is more feasible between related firms, because they presumably embrace a common set of goals for the consolidated group. This device is readily more applicable if the MNE operates on an integrated worldwide basis. Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

22 Leads and Lags: Retiming the Transfer of Funds
Because the use of leads and lags is an obvious technique for minimizing foreign exchange exposure and for shifting the burden of financing, many governments impose limits on the allowed range. Leading or lagging between independent firms requires the time preference of one firm to be imposed to the detriment of the other firm. Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

23 Re-Invoicing Centers A re-invoicing center is a separate corporate subsidiary that serves as a type of middle-man between the parent or related unit in one location and all foreign subsidiaries in a geographic region. As depicted in the following exhibit, the US manufacturing unit of Cascade USA invoices the firm’s re-invoicing center – in US dollars. The re-invoicing center in turn resells to Cascade Mexico in Mexican pesos. Consequently, all operating units deal only in their own currency, and all transaction exposure lies with the re-invoicing center. Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

24 Exhibit 21.4 Use of a Reinvoicing Center
Cascade USA (Manufactures unfinished switches) Cascade Mexico (Finishes for local sales) Physical goods Goods are re-sold by reinvoicing center to Mexican sales affiliate in Mexican pesos (Ps) Goods are sold by Cascade USA to reinvoicing center in U.S. dollars Reinvoicing Center 1. Cascade USA ships goods directly to the Mexican subsidiary. 2. The invoice by Cascade USA, which is denominated in U.S. dollars, is passed to the reinvoicing center. 3. The reinvoicing center takes legal title to the goods. 4. The reinvoicing center invoices Cascade Mexico in Mexican pesos, repositioning the currency exposure from both operating units to the reinvoicing center. Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

25 Re-Invoicing Centers The three main benefits of such a strategy are:
Managing foreign exchange exposure in one place Guaranteeing the exchange rate for future orders Managing intra-subsidiary cash flows The main disadvantage is that the benefits may not justify the agency cost (an additional corporate unit with its own set of books). The establishment of such a center is also likely to bring increased scrutiny by tax authorities. Copyright © 2004 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


Download ppt "Chapter 21 Repositioning Funds."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google