1. HCPSS End-of-Year Teacher Evaluation Process April Leadership I

2. Outcomes – Participants will… Use the 2013 Charlotte Danielson Framework for Teaching to identify criteria for high-quality artifacts. Affirm criteria for determining insufficient, partial, or full attainment of Student Learning Objectives. Understand the year-end evaluation process Become aware of resources that support the the final evaluation process.

3. Agenda Idea Exchange Artifact Analysis Evaluation Summary Report End-of-Year Conference process Supports and Resources

4. Idea Exchange Form standing groups of 3-4. Discuss practices and supports you have put in place to facilitate the evaluation process.

5. Artifact Analysis Review the sample artifact. Refer to the rubric for 4C: Communicating with Families. Work with your table group to determine a level of performance. Use the language of the rubric to justify your decision.

6. Process Guide pgs. 18-21

7. Artifacts Teachers must upload at least 1 artifact per component in domains 1 and 4. A single artifact can be used as evidence for more than one component.

8. Rating SLOs Review the student data for the SLO target. Determine the level of attainment.

9. Rating SLOs Click the appropriate level of performance in Teachscape within: External Measures – SLOs.

10. Overall Score—out of 12 Points 10 – 12 points = Highly Effective 7 – 9.99 points = Effective 3.5 – 6.99 = Ineffective Professional Practice— 6 points possible Planning and Preparation Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities Student Growth— 6 points possible SLO 1 SLO 2

11. Professional Practice Contribution Numerical Values Unsatisfactory = 1 Basic = 2 Proficient = 3 Distinguished = 4 Professional Practice Average3.32 Professional Practice Contribution to Overall Score 4.98 DomainScore Domain 1: Planning and Preparation 3.5 Domain 2: Classroom Environment 2.8 Domain 3: Instruction3.3 Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities 3.67

12. Student Growth Contribution Numerical Values Insufficient Attainment = 1 Partial Attainment = 2 Full Attainment = 3 SLO 12 SLO 23 Student Growth Average2.5 Student Growth Contribution5

13. Overall Score—out of 12 Points 10 – 12 points = Highly Effective 7 – 9.99 points = Effective 3.5 – 6.99 = Ineffective Professional Practice— 6 points possible Planning and Preparation Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities Student Growth— 6 points possible SLO 1 SLO 2 Areas of EvaluationScore Professional Practice4.98 Student Growth5 Overall Score9.98

15. End-of-Year Conferences Read about the HCPSS Year-End Evaluation Process. As you read place a: √ check mark beside something you already knew ? question mark beside something you are wondering about * star by something that resonates with you.

16. Teacher Signature Sign Off Required

17. Principal Signature Sign Off Required

18. For Administrators Supports One-on-one support from your POD contact Support from Admin Directors Webinars on request Other ideas? Resources Evaluation resources on the School Administration HUB Resources on the Teacher Evaluation wiki

22. For Teachers Supports POD contact support for TDLs “Office hours” Webinars on request Resources Evaluation wiki & FAQ Artifact Module (TDLs) Sub for TDLs Workshop wages for teachers Screencast: Evaluation Summary Report

24. Teacher Evaluation Summary Report

26. HCPSS End-of-Year Teacher Evaluation Process April Leadership I