Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRandell Pope Modified over 9 years ago
1
Semi-Supervised State Space Models
2
A Big Thanks To Prof. Jason Bohland Quantitative Neuroscience Laboratory Boston University Istavan (Pisti) Morocz, Harvard, MNI Firdaus Janoos, OSU/Harvard,MIT/Exxon
3
Sources http://neufo.org/lecture_events NIPS 2011
4
A Running Example
5
Difficulty in learning arithmetic that cannot be explained by mental retardation, inappropriate schooling, or poor social environment Core conceptual deficit dealing with numbers Very common : 3-6% of school-age children Heterogeneous DyscalculiaDyslexia Selective inability to build a visual representation of a word, used in subsequent language processing, in the absence of general visual impairment or speech disorders Affects 5-10% of the population Spelling, phonological processing, word retrieval Disorder of the visual word form system Multiple varieties Occipital, temporal, frontal, cerebellum
6
Experimental protocols Event-related designs -single stimuli/“events” at any time point -Periodic or spread across frequencies -Require rapidly acquired data(small TR) -Rapid events (less than ~20s apart) give rise to temporal summation of BOLD response -Summation is close to linear, but non-linearities are evident for small ISIs. Stimulus function (s(t))
7
Mental Arithmetic Paradigm
8
Mental Arithmetic Involves basic manipulation of number and quantities Magnitude based system – bilateral IPS Verbal based system – left AG Attentional system – ps Parietal Lobule Other systems – SMA, primary visual cortex, liPFC, insula, etc
9
Cascadic Recruitment
10
Classical fMRI Pipeline
11
State-of-the-Art - ROI Janoos et al., EuroVis2009
12
Another Way ?
13
Multi-voxel pattern analysis Traditional analyses focus has focused on relationship between task and individual brain voxels (or regions) MVPA uses patterns of observed activation across sets of voxels to decode represented information –Relies on machine learning / pattern classification algorithms –Claim: more sensitive detection of cognitive states (Mind Reading) –Does not employ spatial smoothing –Typically conducted within individual subjects http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/nikolaus.kriegeskorte/infonotacti.html Inter-voxel differences contain information!
14
Brain States
16
Inspiration
17
Haxby, 2001
18
Mitchell, 2008
19
Functional Networks
20
Functional / Effective Connectivity Standard analysis of fMRI data conforms to a functional segregation approach to brain function i.e. brain regions are active for a stimulus type Assumes the inputs have access to all brain regions Pertinent Question: How do active brain regions interact with one another? [ functional integration ] Effective Connectivity = the functional strength of a specific anatomical connection during a particular cognitive task; i.e. the influence that one region has on another. ( Inferred ) Functional Connectivity = the temporal correlation between signal from two brain regions during a cognitive task ( Measured ) [ But these are exceptionally fuzzy terms ]
21
A Solution – State Space Models
22
Functional Distance ? Zt 1 Zt 2 Zt 3 Is Zt 1 < Zt 2,or Zt 2 < Zt 3,or Sort Zt 1, Zt 2, Zt 3
23
State Space Model
24
Comprehensive Model
25
State-Space Model Janoos et al., MICCAI 2010
26
Computation al Workflow
27
Feature Space Estimation
28
Functional Distance
29
Transportation Distance
30
Functional Distance Z t – activation patterns f - transportation
31
Transportation Distance
32
Functional Connectivity Estimation
33
Algorithm
34
Clustering in Functional Space
35
Critique No neurophysiologic model Point estimates Hemodynamic uncertainty Temporal structure Functional distance - an optimization problem No metric structure Expensive !
36
Embeddings
37
A Solution Distortion minimizing
38
Feature Space Φ Orthogonal Bases Graph Partitioning Normalized graph Laplacian of F
39
Working in Feature Space Φ
40
Feature Selection
41
Model Size Selection Strike balance between model complexity and model fit Information theoretic or Bayesian criteria Notion of model complexity Cross-validation IID Assumption
42
Estimation
43
Chosen Method
44
Premise - EM Algorithm
45
Generalized EM Algorithm http://mplab.ucsd.edu/tutorials/EM.pdf
46
Mean Field Approximation
47
Experimental Conditions
48
Comprehensive Model
49
Comparisons
50
HRFs
51
Optimal States
52
Spatial Maps
53
Population Studies (sort of)
54
Interpretation Janoos et al., NeuroImage, 2011 Control Dyscalculic Dyslexic
55
MDS Plots
57
Stage-wise Error Plots
58
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 1: Product Size Phase 2: Problem Difficulty Stage-wise MDS Plots
59
What Else ?
60
Maximally Predictive Criteria Multiple spatio-temporal patterns in fMRI Neurophysiological task related vs. default networks Extraneous Breathing, pulsatile, scanner drift Select a model that is maximally predictive with respect to task Predictability of optimal state-sequence from stimulus, s
61
“Resting State” Rather than evoked responses, rs-fMRI looks at random, low- frequency fluctuations of BOLD activity (Biswal, 1995) “industry standard” filters data at ~0.01 < f < 0.08 Hz “Default mode” network (Raichle et al., 2001) Set of regions with correlated BOLD activity Activation decreases when subjects perform an explicit task Ventromedial PFC, precuneus, temporal-parietal junction… But the default mode is only one network that emerges from the correlation structure of resting state networks Smith et al (2009) showed various task-active networks emerge from ICA based interrogation of rs-fMRI data
62
Summary Process model for fMRI Spatial patterns and the temporal structure Identification of internal mental processes Neurophysiologically plausible Test for the effects of experimental variables Parameter interpretation Comparison of mental processes Abstract representation of patterns
63
Thank You for Putting Up with me for 9 Lectures
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.