Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Intrusion Detection Systems Present by Ali Fanian In the Name of Allah.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Intrusion Detection Systems Present by Ali Fanian In the Name of Allah."— Presentation transcript:

1 Intrusion Detection Systems Present by Ali Fanian In the Name of Allah

2 Outline Intrusion Concept Intrusion Detection Systems(IDS) Types of IDS Attacks to the IDS Gateway Intrusion Detection System Host-based Intrusion Detection

3 What is an intrusion? An intrusion can be defined as “any set of actions that attempt to compromise the: –Integrity –confidentiality, or –availability of a resource”.

4 Intruders Insider : abuse by a person with authorized access to the system. Hacker : attack the via communication links (e.g. Internet). Hacker : attack the via communication links (e.g. Internet). Malicious software (`MalWare`, Trojan horse, Virus): attack on the system by software running on it. Malicious software (`MalWare`, Trojan horse, Virus): attack on the system by software running on it.

5 Intrusion Examples VirusBuffer-overflows –2000 Outlook Express vulnerability. Denial of Service (DOS) –explicit attempt by attackers to prevent legitimate users of a service from using that service. Address spoofing –a malicious user uses a fake IP address to send malicious packets to a target. Many others

6 Outline Intrusion Concept Intrusion Detection Systems(IDS) Types of IDS Attacks to the IDS Gateway Intrusion Detection System Host-based Intrusion Detection

7 Intrusion Detection Systems Systems that detect attacks on computer systems.

8 Intrusion Detection Systems Intrusion Prevention System can prevent the network from outside attacks. Internet Intruder Victim IPS

9 IDS Basic Functions Monitoring –Collect the information from the network Analyzing –Determine what, if any thing, is of interest Reporting –Generate conclusions and otherwise act on analysis results

10 Intrusion Detection Systems Firewalls are typically placed on the network perimeter protecting against external attacks Firewalls allow traffic only to legitimate hosts and services Traffic to the legitimate hosts/services can have attacks Solution? –Intrusion Detection Systems –Monitor data and behavior –Report when identify attacks

11 Traditional IDS response tends to be passive response Traditional IDS response tends to be passive response Secondary investigation required because IDS is still imperfect These days, IDS can be set up to respond to events automatically – “active response” Intrusion Detection Systems

12 Active response – dropping connection, reconfiguring networking devices (firewalls, routers) Intrusion Detection Systems

13 Alarm investigation resource would affect the delays in response in both active and passive response If multiple alarm types involved, which alarm to investigate is an issue Intrusion Detection Systems

14 Passive response –potential damage cost - resulting from alarmed events not investigated immediately –low false alarm costs since alarmed events are not disrupted Intrusion Detection Systems

15 Active response –It could prevent attack damage because the events are terminated immediately –higher false alarm costs contingent on the performance of the IDS Intrusion Detection Systems

16 Audit Log Architecture The System Being Monitored IDS Alerts Reports Profiles Audit Log Data

17 Inline Architecture The System Being Monitored IDS Alerts Reports Sniffer Data Profiles

18 Outline Intrusion Concept Intrusion Detection Systems(IDS) Types of IDS Attacks to the IDS Gateway Intrusion Detection System Host-based Intrusion Detection

19 Types of IDS Host-based Network- based Signature- based Anomaly- based

20 Signature-based IDS Characteristics –Uses known pattern matching to signify attack

21 Signature-based IDS Advantages? –Widely available –Fairly fast –Easy to implement –Easy to update Disadvantages? –Cannot detect attacks for which it has no signature

22 Anomaly-based IDS Characteristics Characteristics –Uses statistical model or machine learning engine to characterize normal usage behaviors –Recognizes departures from normal as potential intrusions

23 Anomaly-based IDS Advantages? –Can detect attempts to exploit new and unforeseen vulnerabilities –Can recognize authorized usage that falls outside the normal pattern Disadvantages? Disadvantages? –Generally slower, more resource intensive compared to signature-based IDS –Greater complexity, difficult to configure –Higher percentages of false alerts

24 More Problems with Anomaly Detection The dynamic update problem is unsolved. –You can train these systems successfully to handle static environments, but computer networks are dynamic. –If you try to retrain an existing system to deal with new events, it will usually forget its old training. You have to give it the old training data as well as the new.

25 Possible Approaches to Anomaly Detection Neural networks Expert systems Statistical decision theory

26 Network-based IDS Characteristics –NIDS examine raw packets in the network passively and triggers alerts

27 Network-based IDS Advantages? –Easy deployment –Difficult to evade Disadvantages? –NIDS needs to create traffic seen at the end host –Need to have the complete network topology and complete host behavior

28 Host-based IDS Characteristics –Runs on single host –Can analyze logs, integrity of files and directories, etc.

29 Host-based IDS Advantages –More accurate than NIDS –Less volume of traffic so less overhead Disadvantages –Deployment is expensive –What happens when host get compromised?

30 Honey Pots and Burglar Alarms Burglar alarms are resources on the network that generate an alarm if accessed incorrectly. Honey pots are burglar alarms dressed up to look attractive. Have to look real to the attackers

31 Intrusion Detection Using Honey Pot Honey pot is a “decoy” system that appears to have several vulnerabilities for easy access to its resources. It provides a mechanism so that intrusions can be trapped before attack is made on real assets.

32 Intrusion Detection Using Honey Pot (cont.) Multi-level Log Mechanism (MLLM) MLLM logs the attacker’s activities into –Remote Log Server –Sniffer Server

33 An Architecture for Intrusion Detection using Honey Pot using Honey Pot Intrusion Detection Using Honey Pot (cont.)

34 honeypotHTTPDNS Firewall

35 IDS Placement

36 Outline Intrusion Concept Intrusion Detection Systems(IDS) Types of IDS Attacks to the IDS Gateway Intrusion Detection System Host-based Intrusion Detection

37 Attacks to the IDS Overload until IDS fails to keep up with the data Overload packet filter (easy) Overload event engine (difficult because events are light weighted and attacker doesn’t know policy script) Overload Logging/Recording mechanism

38 Attacks to the IDS An Subterfuge attack attempts to mislead the IDS to the meaning of the analyzed traffic

39 IDS Software Snort­ Free, libpcap based, rules driven IDS package. Many add-on components available. …

40 Outline Intrusion Concept Intrusion Detection Systems(IDS) Types of IDS Attacks to the IDS Gateway Intrusion Detection System Host-based Intrusion Detection

41 What Is a Gateway IDS? Gateway Intrusion Detection System –A network intrusion detection system which acts as a network gateway –Designed to stop malicious traffic and generate alerts on suspicious traffic –An “ideal” gateway IDS is able to stop all known exploits

42 GIDS vs NIDS GIDS Acts as network gateway Stops suspect packets Prevents successful intrusions False positives are VERY bad NIDS Only observes network traffic Logs suspect packets and generates alerts Cannot stop an intruder False positives are not as big of an issue

43 About Inline Snort Based on the Snort intrusion detection system Operation is similar to some bridging firewalls Uses snort rules with some additional keywords to make forward/drop decisions Compatible with most snort plugins Freely available under the GPL

44 Inline Snort drop Drops a packet, sends an rst, logs the packet ignore Drops a packet without sending an rst sdrop Drops a packet, sends an rst, does not log the packet

45 Content Replacement It can replace content in a packet –“replace” keyword tells hogwash to replace a detected string with another string. –Example: alert tcp any any -> $IIS_SERVERS 80 (content:”cmd.exe”; replace:”yyy.yyy”;) –Any content in the packet payload can be replaced. –A great way to break an exploit without dropping the packet!!

46 Sample snort Rules To drop incoming port 80 connections: drop tcp any any -> $HOMENET 80 (msg:”Port 80 tcp”) To drop cmd.exe calls to your webservers: drop tcp any any -> $HOMENET 80 (msg:“cmd.exe attempt”; content: “cmd.exe”) drop tcp any any -> $HOMENET 80 (msg:“cmd.exe attempt”; content: “cmd.exe”)

47 Outline Intrusion Concept Intrusion Detection Systems(IDS) Types of IDS Attacks to the IDS Gateway Intrusion Detection System Host-based Intrusion Detection

48 Anomaly detection: IDS monitors system call trace from the app DB contains a list of subtraces that are allowed to appear Any observed subtrace not in DB sets off alarms App allowed traces IDS Operating System

49 HIDS’ Advantages over NIDS HIDS can monitor user-specific activity of the system –Check process listing, local log files, system calls. –It is difficult for NIDS to associate packets to specific users (except when content switch-based NIDS is used!) and to determine if the commands in the packets violate specific user’s access privilege.


Download ppt "Intrusion Detection Systems Present by Ali Fanian In the Name of Allah."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google