1. Range of Natural Variability Pete Fulé Northern Arizona University What is RNV? RNV relates to … Ecosystem Management … Ecological Restoration … Conservation Biology Historical forest structure and function in the Southwest

2. What is RNV? “A science of land health needs, first of all, a base datum of normality, a picture of how healthy land maintains itself as an organism.” Aldo Leopold (1941) What is the “base datum”? Terms: range of natural variability, historical variability, reference conditions

3. “We define natural variability as the ecological conditions, and the spatial and temporal variation in these conditions, that are relatively unaffected by people, within a period of time and geographical area …” (Landres et al. (1999): Ecol. App. 9:1279-1288) “The (dynamic) conditions that would exist if the dominant Euro-American culture had never arrived, but Native Americans had continued to use the landscape.” (Stephenson (1999): Ecol. App. 9:1253-1265)

4. Why care? Modern human impacts may diminish species viability. Coarse-filter management strategy conserves even poorly understood species. Fewer external subsidies when manage within bounds of system. Useful reference point for human-caused impacts. Analysis at long time frames & large scales. Recognizes importance of disturbance. Spatial heterogeneity important for resilience. Landres et al. 1999

5. RNV and Ecosystem Management Conservation of ecosystem structure, composition, and function across the full range of spatial and temporal scales: –Think long term –Save all the pieces –Save all the processes –Assure sustainability Kaufmann et al. (1994) Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-246

6. Ecological Principles Applied at Appropriate Spatial And Temporal Themes Ecosystem Needs Assessment Kaufmann et al. 1994, Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-246

7. Air Quality Water Quality Weather Hydrology Aquatic Systems Geomorphic Processes Fire/Fuels Regime Corridors Travel Linkages Species Viability Fragmentation Habitat Relationships Insects & Pathogens Nutrient/Soil Productivity Succession & Community Ecoregion   Subregion   Landscape   Watershed/Land Unit

8. RNV and Ecosystem Management EM (and other management approaches) are not “science-based” but “science-informed.” RNV is fundamental to EM but is not necessarily the goal. In Ecological Restoration, the RNV can become the goal or target of a management action. But ER is a subset of EM (“tool in the toolbox”…). Ultimately our objective is not to pick some perfect management paradigm, but to continually improve and adapt management in an evolving relationship between ecological and social constraints and capabilities.

9. RNV and Ecological Restoration Ecological restoration is the process of assisting the recovery and management of ecological integrity. Ecological integrity includes a critical range of variability in biodiversity, ecological processes and structures, regional and historical context, and sustainable cultural practices” (Society for Ecological Restoration 1998). “Ecological restoration is the process of assisting the recovery of an ecosystem that has been degraded, damaged, or destroyed” (SER 2002).

10. Restoration shares many values with sustainable resource management, conservation biology, and land reclamation. Two distinguishing characteristics are: (1) The use of intact, indigenous ecosystems as the point of reference; (2) A focus usually at the scale of entire ecosystems. Southwestern forest restoration traces its lineage to Aldo Leopold. Key studies were done by Harold Weaver (1940’s-50’s) and Charles Cooper (1950’s- 60’s), as well as many other scientists and resource managers.

11. Reference Conditions: Leopold’s “base datum” 1. Reconstruct past conditions through dendroecological, paleoecological, or other historical ecology techniques. 2. Measure relatively undisturbed contemporary sites to compare to reconstructed data and to explore the effects of altered modern conditions such as high CO 2 levels. 3. Draw inferences from ecological relationships observed in disturbed sites. 4. Restore ecological conditions as a modern model for observing ecosystem function.

12. Information on RNV: Multiple Lines of Evidence Information on RNV is often fragmentary, limited, incomplete. Make use of multiple lines of evidence. Always recognize limitations of the data.

13. Swetnam et al. 1999, Ecol. App. 9:1189-1206

14. Historical Ecology Methods: Written & Oral Histories Written documents include historic forest inventories, scientific/military expeditions, colonial records, land surveys, diaries, missionaries. Photographs and maps. Oral histories may be available or you may develop an oral history to capture local knowledge.

15. Written Histories & Photographs Goals and cultural filter of the historian. Propaganda and advertisement. Biases in scientific studies. Biases in forest inventories. Practical biases (selection of trees in land survey). All these factors also apply to maps and photographs. Photo G. Pearson 1909, Grandview (Grand Can.) Courtesy Rocky Mountain Research Station

16. Mt. Trumbull, Arizona: 1870 Moore et al. (1999), Ecol. App. 9:1266-1277.

17. Mt. Trumbull, Arizona: 1995 Moore et al. (1999), Ecol. App. 9:1266-1277.

18. Logging near Cloudcroft from 1903, courtesy of the Rick Miller collection of historic photos. There are historic Mixed Conifer plots in "Cox Canyon" (south of Cloudcroft) and Douglas-Fir plots near (what is now) Pine Campground. Andrew Sanchez Meador

19. Detail of a forest plot mapped in 1915 by G. Pearson and T. Woolsey, Fort Valley Experimental Forest, AZ

20. Check mark on Woolsey map represents a ponderosa pine seedling over 12“; X with a line under it is a cut yellow pine stump. Andrew J. Meador

21. Taos: several Woolsey plots around Taos, but most have not been found. Amole, Gallegos, Cienaga, Osha Canyon, Rio Pueblo, La Junta, and numerous plots in Angostura. This is a pine plot at Amole. Andrew Sanchez Meador

22. Cienaga post-fire ingrowth. Andrew Sanchez Meador

23. Written and Oral Histories Include Traditional Knowledge Native American sources –Kat Anderson, California tribes –Thom Alcoze, Kaibab Paiute & Cherokee Anthropological sources –Ranching, farming, logging practices Relationship between historical sources and archeological evidence Relationship between historical sources and ecological evidence –Population and fire in Mexico –Apache presence/cambial scars/fire in New Mexico

24. Historical Ecology Methods: Dendroecology Application of dendrochronology (crossdating tree rings) to ecological questions. Dendrochronology invented in Flagstaff! Basics of dendrochronology Climate example Forest structure example

25. Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona

26. Woodhouse & Bauer: World Data Center A

28. Reconstructing Forest Structure with Dendrochronology: Gus Pearson Natural Area Dendrochronology for tree age 100% sampling of dead trees –Test of reconstruction methods –Test of accuracy of restoration silviculture Mapping of all tree positions Age structure: RNV & target for restoration Age structure of groups: regeneration and fire patterns

29. Mast et al (1999) Ecol. App. 9:228-239 Assessing Age Structure for Ecological Restoration

30. Mast et al. 1999, Ecol. App. 9:228-239

31. Restoring Spatial Structure of the Forest Covington et al. (1997) Journal of Forestry 95:23-29

33. Restoration Techniques Overstory trees: thinning, species composition, spatial pattern, old-growth. Understory herbs and shrubs: natural regeneration, seeding, planting. Fuels: accumulated fuels, canopy fuels, dead biomass as nutrient sources and habitat. Fire: re-introducing fire, unique initial burn conditions, smoke. Monitoring and adapting: evaluating results and making changes. Covington, W.W., P.Z. Fulé, M.M. Moore, S.C. Hart, T.E. Kolb, J.N. Mast, S.S. Sackett, and M.R. Wagner. 1997. Restoration of ecosystem health in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Journal of Forestry 95(4):23-29.