Download presentation
Published byBertha Greer Modified over 9 years ago
1
Use of Remote Sensing Data for Delineation of Wildland Fire Effects
Presented by: Jason Adams Spatial Database Administrator Yukon Wildland Fire Management
2
Overview Background Information Platforms Utilized
Methodologies Employed Conclusions
3
Remote Sensing Platforms
MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) LandSAT TM/ETM (Thematic Mapper) SPOT Image QuickBird Airborne GPS
4
Background Information
Hotspot Detections are processed into polygons. MODIS Hotspot Fire Detections
5
Background Information
False colour MODIS image Fall 2004 LandSAT TM Bands very similar 250m Resolution False colour imagery is available in Near Real Time for Heads Up Digitizing
6
Background Information
Red = Band 7 (mid-IR) Green = Band 4 (near-IR) Blue = Band 3 (visual red) Post Season LandSAT TM Data is used for the bulk of Fire Effects Mapping. Inset shows band reflectance differences between unburned and burned forests. Infrared response is key to mapping.
7
MODIS Platform There are two main products of the MODIS program employed by WFM. Hotspot data (Thermal) False colour imagery (Reflected Infrared)
8
MODIS Platform
9
Using MODIS Hotspot Data
10
Using MODIS Hotspot Data
11
Using MODIS Hotspot Data
Classic Geoprocessing Back-Buffer points Hotspot points Buffer points
12
Using MODIS Hotspot Data
13
Using MODIS Hotspot Data
Map Display
14
SPOT Image 10m SPOT Imagery
Black indicates burn area, red indicates healthy vegetation (Similar to IR Photo) Heads up digitized on tablet PC running ArcMap
15
Quickbird In 2007 this image was acquired along the Dempster Highway and contained part of a 2007 fire. Testing phase for uses in delineation of fire effects.
16
LandSAT TM Overview of 2007 fire DA-11 in a LandSAT TM band combination Detail shown at level used for Heads-up digitizing. Scene Level View, DA-11 seen in bottom left quadrant. Even light cloud cover is still valuable.
17
Comparison of Methods Fire BC-03-2006 MODIS Hotspot Buffer
GPS Perimeter LandSAT Perimeter Comparison in detail
18
Burn Severity & LandSAT
19
Burn Severity & LandSAT
Landsat Pre and Postfire Views of the Herron River Fire, DENA 2001 TM4 – TM7 NBR = TM4 + TM7
20
Burn Severity & LandSAT
WFM has run a trial with dNBR Some challenges are faced. Could lead to automated fire poly generation with some GIS processing. No field verification program, see challenges above.
21
Airborne GPS Becoming rare for use as final mapping as cost and accuracy of hyper-spectral satellite imagery is becoming lower, soon to be free (LandSAT). Mainly used on campaign fires where data is needed right away. Although accuracy is “better” on GPS units then a 30m pixel LandSAT image the method of collection (flying around in a helicopter) compromises this. Picture an intoxicated individual walking a line.
22
GPS Accuracy Three hour plot of stationary GPS, differentially corrected
23
Airborne GPS Real World example BC-03-06
Post Fire LandSAT Scene with GPS Track (blue) and RS digitized perimeter (yellow) Comparison of GPS Track (blue) and RS digitized perimeter (black) Post Fire LandSAT Scene with GPS Track Pre Fire LandSAT Scene with GPS Track Pre Fire LandSAT Scene Post Fire LandSAT Scene
24
Methodologies Primary method of fire effects (perimeter) data capture is via digitizing hyperspectral imagery on tablet PC. Secondary method is GPS capture Future methods to use hyperspectral data and dNBR, this will give both perimeter and severity data.
25
Conclusions Given the size of the Yukon and staffing level, Remote Sensing is the ONLY option for collection of fire data. For present time LandSAT is perfectly adequate, SPOT shows a gain is precision but would be cost prohibitive. Quickbird is interesting however would probably be only used for WUI or large scale mapping of culturally/ecologically significant targets
26
Haeckel Hill Fire, Whitehorse, 1991
Thank-you Haeckel Hill Fire, Whitehorse, 1991
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.