Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFrederica West Modified over 9 years ago
1
Chapter 1 Introduction to Cognitive Psychology
2
The Complexity of Cognition Cognition involves –Perception –Attention –Memory –Representation of knowledge –Language –Problem-solving –Reasoning and decision-making All include “hidden” processes of which we may not be aware
3
Some Questions to Consider How is cognitive psychology relevant to everyday experience? Are there practical applications of cognitive psychology? How is it possible to study the inner workings of the mind when we can’t really see the mind directly? What is the connection between computers and the study of the mind?
4
The First Cognitive Psychologists Donders (1868) –Mental chronometry Measuring how long a cognitive process takes –Reaction-time (RT) experiment Measures interval between stimulus presentation and person’s response to stimulus
5
The First Cognitive Psychologists Donders (1868) –Simple RT task: participant pushes a button quickly after a light appears –Choice RT task: participant pushes one button if light is on right side, another if light is on left side
6
Caption: A modern version of Donders’ (1868) reaction-time experiment: (a) the simple reaction-time task; and (b) the choice reaction-time task.
7
The First Cognitive Psychologists Donders (1868) –Choice RT – Simple RT = Time to make a decision Choice RT = 1/10 th sec longer than Simple RT 1/10 th sec to make decision
8
The First Cognitive Psychologists Donders (1868) –Mental responses cannot be measured directly but can be inferred from the participant’s behavior
9
The First Cognitive Psychologists Helmholtz (~1860s) –Unconscious inference Some of our perceptions are the result of unconscious assumptions we make about the environment –We infer much of what we know about the world
10
The First Cognitive Psychologists Ebbinghaus (1885) –Read list of nonsense syllables aloud many times to determine number of repetitions necessary to repeat list without errors
11
The First Cognitive Psychologists Ebbinghaus (1885) –After some time, he relearned the list Short intervals = fewer repetitions to relearn –Learned many different lists at many different retention intervals
12
The First Cognitive Psychologists Ebbinghaus (1885) –Savings = [(initial repetitions) – (relearning repetitions)] / (initial repetitions) –Forgetting curve shows savings as a function of retention interval
13
Caption: Ebbinghaus’s retention curve, determined by the method of savings. (Based on data from Ebbinghaus, 1885.)
14
The First Cognitive Psychologists Wundt (1897) –First psychology laboratory –University of Leipzig, Germany –RT experiments
15
The First Cognitive Psychologists Wundt (1897) –Approach Structuralism: experience is determined by combining elements of experience called sensations –Method Analytic introspection: participants trained to describe experiences and thought processes in response to stimuli
16
The First Cognitive Psychologists John Watson noted two problems with this: –Extremely variable results from person to person –Results difficult to verify Invisible inner mental processes
17
The Rise of Behaviorism John Watson proposed a new approach called behaviorism –Eliminate the mind as a topic of study –Instead, study directly observable behavior
18
The Rise of Behaviorism Watson (1920) – “Little Albert” experiment –Classical conditioning of fear –9-month-old became frightened by a rat after a loud noise was paired with every presentation of the rat
19
Classical Conditioning Pair a neutral event with an event that naturally produces some outcome After many pairings, the “neutral” event now also produces the outcome
20
Pavlov’s Discovery: Classical Conditioning Caption: Pavlov’s famous experiment paired ringing a bell with presentation of food. Initially, only presentation of the food caused the dog to salivate, but after a number of pairings of bell and food, the bell alone caused salivation. This principle of learning by pairing, which came to be called classical conditioning, was the basis of Watson’s “Little Albert” experiment.
21
The Rise of Behaviorism Watson (1920) – “Little Albert” experiment –Behavior can be analyzed without any reference to the mind –Examined how pairing one stimulus with another affected behavior
22
The Rise of Behaviorism Skinner (1950s) –Interested in determining the relationship between stimuli and response –Operant conditioning Shape behavior by rewards or punishments Behavior that is rewarded is more likely to be repeated Behavior that is punished is less likely to be repeated
23
Caption: Timeline showing early experiments studying the mind in the 1800s and events associated with the rise of behaviorism in the 1900s
24
The Decline of Behaviorism A controversy over language acquisition Skinner (1957) –Argued children learn language through operant conditioning Children imitate speech they hear Correct speech is rewarded
25
The Decline of Behaviorism Chomsky (1959) –Argued children do not only learn language through imitation and reinforcement Children say things they have never heard and can not be imitating Children say things that are incorrect and have not been rewarded for –Language must be determined by inborn biological program
26
The Decline of Behaviorism The Misbehavior of Organisms (1961) –Attempts to condition animal behavior did not work –Animals’ built-in instincts prevailed
27
The Decline of Behaviorism Tolman (1938) trained rats to find food in a four-armed maze Two competing interpretations: –Behaviorism predicts that the rats learned to “turn right to find food” –Tolman believed that the rats had created a cognitive map of the maze and were navigating to a specific arm
28
The Decline of Behaviorism Tolman (1938) What happens when the rats are placed in a different arm of the maze? The rats navigated to the specific arm where they previously found food –Supported Tolman’s interpretation –Did not support behaviorism interpretation
29
Caption: Maze used by Tolman. (a) Rat initially explores the maze; (b) then learns to turn right to obtain food at B when it starts at A; (c) when placed at C, the rat turns left to reach the food at B. In this experiment, precautions are taken to prevent the rat from knowing where the food is based on cues such as smell.
30
Studying the Mind To understand complex cognitive behaviors: –Measure observable behavior –Make inferences about underlying cognitive activity –Consider what this behavior says about how the mind works
31
The Cognitive Revolution Shift from behaviorist’s stimulus-response relationships to an approach that attempts to explain behavior in terms of the mind
32
The Cognitive Revolution Information-processing approach –A way to study the mind created from insights associated with the digital computer
33
Caption: (a) Flow diagram for an early computer. (b) Flow diagram for Broadbent’s filter model of attention.
34
The Cognitive Revolution Early computers (1950s) –Processed information in stages How much information can the mind absorb? Attend to just some of the incoming information?
35
The Cognitive Revolution Cherry (1953) Dichotic listening –Present message A in left ear –Present message B in right ear –To ensure attention, shadow one message Participants were able to focus only on the message they were shadowing
36
The Cognitive Revolution Broadbent (1958) –Flow diagram representing what happens as a person directs attention to one stimulus –Unattended information does not pass through the filter
37
FIG 1.12 Caption: Timeline showing events associated with the decline of the influence of behaviorism (above the line) and events that led to the development of the information-processing approach to cognitive psychology (below the line).
38
Researching the Mind Behavior approach measures relationship between stimuli and behavior Physiological approach measures relationship between physiology and behavior Both contribute to our understanding of cognition
39
Researching the Mind – Memory Consolidation Memory for recent events is fragile If processing is disrupted, recent memories can fail to be consolidated New information can interfere with memory consolidation
40
Researching the Mind – Memory Consolidation Behavior approach Muller and Pilzecker (1900) had participants learn two lists of words –Independent variable: One group learned the second list immediately after the first list The other group experienced a six-minute delay between learning the lists –Dependent variable: Memory (recall) for the first list of words
42
Researching the Mind – Memory Consolidation Behavior Approach Gais et al. (2007) the effect of sleep on memory consolidation –Independent variable: One group learned a list of words shortly before going to sleep The other group, many hours before going to sleep –Dependent variable: Memory (forgetting) for the list of words measured two days later
43
Caption: Results of the Gais et al. (2007) experiment in which memory for word pairs was tested for two groups. The sleep group went to sleep shortly after learning a list of word pairs. The awake group stayed awake for quite a while after learning the word pairs. Both groups did get to sleep before testing, so they were equally rested before being tested, but the performance of the sleep group was better.
44
Researching the Mind – Memory Consolidation Physiological approach Gais et al. (2007) the effect of sleep on memory consolidation –Brain activity at encoding and retrieval –Measured using brain imaging (fMRI) Results –Found differential brain activity between the two groups
45
Cognitive Science Interdisciplinary study of the mind –Psychology –Computer science –Cognitive anthropology –Linguistics –Neuroscience –Philosophy Goal: finding ways to study and understand the inner workings of the mind
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.